• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[跨护理级别护理连续性问卷的设计与内容效度护理级别间护理连续性问卷的设计与内容效度]

[Design and content validity of the Continuity of Care Across Levels of Care QuestionnaireDesenho e validade de conteúdo do questionário de continuidade de cuidados entre os níveis de ateneo].

作者信息

Marín Sánchez Alexandra, Gogeascoechea-Trejo María Del Carmen, Vélez Álvarez Consuelo, Blázquez-Morales María Sobeida Leticia, Pavón-León Patricia, Nachón-García María Gabriela, Cinta Loaiza Dulce María

机构信息

Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias de la Salud. Instituto de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa - México. E-mail:

Investigadora. Instituto de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa -México. E-mail:

出版信息

Rev Cuid. 2023 Sep 8;14(2):e12. doi: 10.15649/cuidarte.2773. eCollection 2023 May-Aug.

DOI:10.15649/cuidarte.2773
PMID:40115211
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11559311/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In the absence of continuity of care, actions aimed at the care of users with chronic non communicable diseases (NCDs) may be omitted or duplicated, which can potentially worsen users' health. In Mexico and Colombia, in particular, there is no instrument for assessing continuity of care that includes its three essential elements.

OBJECTIVE

To develop an instrument to assess care continuity across levels of care for users with NCDs in Mexico and Colombia and validate the content of the questionnaire through expert judgment of versions adapted to the Mexican and Colombian contexts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Continuity of Care across Levels of Care Questionnaire was designed. The content validation process was carried out by experts using the Delphi technique. Sixteen experts were selected (8 per country). Questionnaire items were assessed in four categories: sufficiency, clarity, coherence, and relevance. Two assessment rounds were conducted to determine the level of experts' agreement.

RESULTS

The questionnaire obtained an 'Excellent' overall Content Validity Coefficient in both countries (0.97).

DISCUSSION

This instrument, unlike others, assesses the continuity of care in a multidisciplinary manner across the three levels of care from the experience of users with NCDs.

CONCLUSION

The questionnaire achieved the expected content validity using the Delphi technique to assess care continuity across levels of care for users with NCDs, according to the Mexican and Colombian contexts.

摘要

引言

在缺乏连续性照护的情况下,针对慢性非传染性疾病(NCD)患者的照护行动可能会被遗漏或重复,这可能会使患者的健康状况恶化。特别是在墨西哥和哥伦比亚,没有一种评估连续性照护的工具包含其三个基本要素。

目的

开发一种工具,用于评估墨西哥和哥伦比亚非传染性疾病患者在不同照护层面的照护连续性,并通过对适应墨西哥和哥伦比亚情况的问卷版本进行专家判断来验证问卷内容。

材料与方法

设计了跨照护层面的连续性照护问卷。内容验证过程由专家采用德尔菲技术进行。共挑选了16名专家(每个国家8名)。问卷项目从四个类别进行评估:充分性、清晰度、连贯性和相关性。进行了两轮评估以确定专家的一致程度。

结果

该问卷在两个国家均获得了“优秀”的总体内容效度系数(0.97)。

讨论

与其他工具不同,该工具从非传染性疾病患者的体验出发,以多学科方式评估三个照护层面的照护连续性。

结论

根据墨西哥和哥伦比亚的情况,该问卷采用德尔菲技术评估非传染性疾病患者在不同照护层面的照护连续性,达到了预期的内容效度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f900/11559311/c41720bf8fd9/2346-3414-cuid-14-02-e12-gch7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f900/11559311/1dafe0405652/2346-3414-cuid-14-02-e12-gch1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f900/11559311/d5142bfedd25/2346-3414-cuid-14-02-e12-gch2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f900/11559311/85e925cc18cf/2346-3414-cuid-14-02-e12-gch3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f900/11559311/72aebb29f420/2346-3414-cuid-14-02-e12-gch4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f900/11559311/3bd4bc93662c/2346-3414-cuid-14-02-e12-gch5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f900/11559311/e98a8f6b43bf/2346-3414-cuid-14-02-e12-gch6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f900/11559311/c41720bf8fd9/2346-3414-cuid-14-02-e12-gch7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f900/11559311/1dafe0405652/2346-3414-cuid-14-02-e12-gch1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f900/11559311/d5142bfedd25/2346-3414-cuid-14-02-e12-gch2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f900/11559311/85e925cc18cf/2346-3414-cuid-14-02-e12-gch3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f900/11559311/72aebb29f420/2346-3414-cuid-14-02-e12-gch4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f900/11559311/3bd4bc93662c/2346-3414-cuid-14-02-e12-gch5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f900/11559311/e98a8f6b43bf/2346-3414-cuid-14-02-e12-gch6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f900/11559311/c41720bf8fd9/2346-3414-cuid-14-02-e12-gch7.jpg

相似文献

1
[Design and content validity of the Continuity of Care Across Levels of Care QuestionnaireDesenho e validade de conteúdo do questionário de continuidade de cuidados entre os níveis de ateneo].[跨护理级别护理连续性问卷的设计与内容效度护理级别间护理连续性问卷的设计与内容效度]
Rev Cuid. 2023 Sep 8;14(2):e12. doi: 10.15649/cuidarte.2773. eCollection 2023 May-Aug.
2
Content validity of the Geriatric Health Assessment Instrument.老年健康评估工具的内容效度。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2016 Apr-Jun;14(2):158-77. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082016AO3455.
3
[Adaptation and validation of the CCAENA(©) scale for the measurement of continuity of care between healthcare levels in Colombia and Brazil].[CCAENA(©)量表在哥伦比亚和巴西医疗保健层级间医疗连续性测量中的适用性与验证]
Gac Sanit. 2015 Mar-Apr;29(2):88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
4
Portuguese version of the EUROPEP questionnaire: contributions to the psychometric validation.欧洲患者满意度调查问卷(EUROPEP)的葡萄牙语版本:对其心理测量学验证的贡献。
Rev Saude Publica. 2016 Oct 3;50(0):61. doi: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050006259.
5
[Cross-cultural adaptation for Colombia and content validity of the RAC scale for assessing the risk of infection in hospitalized adultsAdaptado transcultural para a Colombia e validade de conteúdo da escala RAC para avalia^áo do risco de infecto em adultos hospitalizados].[哥伦比亚的跨文化适应性及用于评估住院成人感染风险的RAC量表的内容效度:哥伦比亚的跨文化改编及RAC量表对住院成人感染风险评估的内容效度]
Rev Cuid. 2022 Aug 28;13(1):e21. doi: 10.15649/cuidarte.2406. eCollection 2022 Jan-Apr.
6
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Diabetes Empowerment Scale - Short Form.糖尿病自我管理能力量表简版的翻译、跨文化调适与验证
Rev Saude Publica. 2017 Mar 23;51(0):16. doi: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2017051006336.
7
Development and validation of educational technology for venous ulcer care.静脉溃疡护理教育技术的开发与验证
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2016 Apr;50(2):309-16. doi: 10.1590/S0080-623420160000200018.
8
Development and validation of a new tool to identify factors that influence users' motivation toward the use of teleconsultation systems: A modified Delphi study.一种用于识别影响用户使用远程会诊系统动机因素的新工具的开发与验证:一项改良的德尔菲研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Jan;157:104618. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104618. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
9
Design and content validation of an instrument measuring user perception of the persuasive design principles in a breastfeeding mHealth app: A modified Delphi study.测量母乳喂养移动健康应用程序中用户对劝导设计原则感知的工具的设计和内容验证:一项改良德尔菲研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Aug;164:104789. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104789. Epub 2022 May 10.
10
[Nurses' perception of the applicability of the continuity of care processPercepção de profissionais de enfermagem sobre a aplicabilidade do processo de continuidade do cuidado].护士对护理连续性过程适用性的认知:护理专业人员对护理连续性过程适用性的看法
Rev Cuid. 2023 May 27;14(1):e02. doi: 10.15649/cuidarte.2210. eCollection 2023 Jan-Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
How have researchers defined and used the concept of 'continuity of care' for chronic conditions in the context of resource-constrained settings? A scoping review of existing literature and a proposed conceptual framework.在资源有限的环境下,研究人员如何定义和使用“慢性病连续性护理”这一概念?对现有文献的范围回顾和提出的概念框架。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Mar 7;17(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0426-1.
2
Continuity of care and its effect on readmissions for COPD patients: A comparative study of Norway and Germany.延续性护理及其对 COPD 患者再入院的影响:挪威和德国的比较研究。
Health Policy. 2018 Jul;122(7):737-745. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 May 26.
3
Patient perspectives on continuity of care: adaption and preliminary psychometric assessment of a Norwegian version of the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire (NCQ-N).
患者对医疗连续性的看法:挪威版奈梅亨连续性问卷(NCQ-N)的改编及初步心理测量评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):760. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2706-1.
4
Improved Blood Pressure Control to Reduce Cardiovascular Disease Morbidity and Mortality: The Standardized Hypertension Treatment and Prevention Project.改善血压控制以降低心血管疾病发病率和死亡率:标准化高血压治疗与预防项目
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016 Dec;18(12):1284-1294. doi: 10.1111/jch.12861. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
5
A tool for assessing continuity of care across care levels: an extended psychometric validation of the CCAENA questionnaire.一种评估不同护理层级间连续性护理的工具:CCAENA 问卷的扩展心理测量验证。
Int J Integr Care. 2013 Dec 3;13:e050. doi: 10.5334/ijic.1160. eCollection 2013.
6
Validation of the care transition measure in multi-ethnic South-East Asia in Singapore.验证在新加坡多元种族的东南亚的护理转接措施。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 16;12:256. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-256.
7
[Continuity of care, innovation and redefinition of professional roles in the healthcare of chronically and terminally ill patients. SESPAS report 2012].[慢性病和绝症患者医疗保健中的连续性护理、创新及专业角色的重新定义。西班牙公共卫生与社会福利部2012年报告]
Gac Sanit. 2012 Mar;26 Suppl 1:63-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.09.032. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
8
Development and testing of a measure designed to assess the quality of care transitions.一项旨在评估护理过渡质量的措施的开发与测试。
Int J Integr Care. 2002;2:e02. doi: 10.5334/ijic.60. Epub 2002 Jun 1.
9
Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC).慢性病照护患者评估量表(PACIC)的开发与验证
Med Care. 2005 May;43(5):436-44. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000160375.47920.8c.
10
Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review.连续性护理:多学科综述。
BMJ. 2003 Nov 22;327(7425):1219-21. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1219.