Messing Karen, Dautel Jean-Paul
Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, QC, Canada.
New Solut. 2025 Aug;35(2):125-136. doi: 10.1177/10482911251324524. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
In Canada and the United States, many low-paid service providers are required to work long hours in a static standing posture. Women, young people, and low-paid workers are significantly more likely to report standing without moving at work. Prolonged sitting has received negative publicity, being associated with low caloric expenditure and, in some studies, with heart disease. Standing is often recommended, with static standing often conflated with walking. But prolonged standing has been associated with pain in the lower limbs and back, varicose veins, damage to arteries, heart disease, and problem pregnancies. Many US and Canadian jurisdictions such as the province of Quebec, Canada, include mandatory provision of seats in their occupational health regulations. Despite these regulations and subsequent jurisprudence, few cashiers, receptionists, or retail sales staff in these two countries can access seats at work. This article suggests some reasons for the lack of enforcement, describes efforts to transform this situation, and critically examines approaches to legislation, inspection, and intervention.
在加拿大和美国,许多低薪服务行业从业者被要求长时间以静态站立姿势工作。女性、年轻人和低薪工作者更有可能报告自己在工作时一动不动地站着。长时间坐着已受到负面宣传,这与热量消耗低有关,并且在一些研究中还与心脏病有关。人们通常建议站立,而静态站立常被等同于行走。但长时间站立与下肢和背部疼痛、静脉曲张、动脉损伤、心脏病以及妊娠问题有关。许多美国和加拿大的司法管辖区,如加拿大魁北克省,在其职业健康法规中规定必须提供座位。尽管有这些规定及后续判例,但在这两个国家,很少有收银员、接待员或零售店员在工作时能有座位可坐。本文提出了执法不力的一些原因,描述了为改变这种状况所做的努力,并批判性地审视了立法、检查和干预的方法。