• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

玻璃体内注射不同局部麻醉方法的比较:一项随机交叉研究。

Comparison of different topical anesthetic methods for intravitreal injections: a randomized crossover study.

作者信息

Lo Jeffrey Man Yeung, Li Veronica Yui Yan, Cheung Rachel Ka Ying, Chow Shing Chuen, Shih Kendrick Co, Fung Nicholas Siu Kay, Lam Wai-Ching

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Grantham Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Department of Ophthalmology, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

Int J Retina Vitreous. 2025 Mar 26;11(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40942-025-00649-6.

DOI:10.1186/s40942-025-00649-6
PMID:40140984
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11948794/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the potential adjunctive effect of pledget anesthetic to topical proparacaine applied in a droplet form in patients undergoing intravitreal injections (IVI).

METHOD

This is a single-centre, prospective, randomized, double-blinded crossover study. 60 patients were included. Patients receiving IVI were given topical 0.5% proparacaine drops then randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 0.5% proparacaine soaked pledget or normal saline soaked pledget as placebo. The patients would later be crossed over to receive the alternative intervention. Pain was assessed with a visual analog scale (VAS) and questionnaire immediately afterwards, 10-minutes and 20-minutes after injection.

RESULT

Pain intensity as assessed on the visual analogue scale was lower for the placebo group compared to the pledget group immediately (2.51 cm vs. 2.8 cm), 10-minutes (1.81 cm vs. 2.13 cm) and 20-minutes (1.23 cm vs. 1.65 cm) after injection, however this was not statistically significant (p = 0.48, p = 0.43, p = 0.24 respectively). However, in a subgroup of treatment naïve patients, the addition of pledget anesthesia may lower pain and make IVI more tolerable.

CONCLUSION

Additional pledget soaked with proparacaine does not enhance anesthesia compared to solely using topical proparacaine for IVI, except in a subset of treatment naïve patients.

摘要

背景

评估在接受玻璃体内注射(IVI)的患者中,棉片麻醉对以滴剂形式应用的局部丙美卡因的潜在辅助作用。

方法

这是一项单中心、前瞻性、随机、双盲交叉研究。纳入60例患者。接受IVI的患者先给予0.5%丙美卡因滴眼液,然后按1:1比例随机分为两组,分别接受浸泡有0.5%丙美卡因的棉片或浸泡有生理盐水的棉片作为安慰剂。患者随后交叉接受另一种干预措施。注射后立即、10分钟和20分钟时,用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和问卷评估疼痛程度。

结果

注射后立即(2.51厘米对2.8厘米)、10分钟(1.81厘米对2.13厘米)和20分钟(1.23厘米对1.65厘米)时,安慰剂组在视觉模拟量表上评估的疼痛强度低于棉片组,但差异无统计学意义(分别为p = 0.48、p = 0.43、p = 0.24)。然而,在未接受过治疗的患者亚组中,添加棉片麻醉可能会减轻疼痛,使IVI更易于耐受。

结论

与仅使用局部丙美卡因进行IVI相比,额外使用浸泡有丙美卡因的棉片并不能增强麻醉效果,除了在未接受过治疗的患者亚组中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95b2/11948794/86995c046b6c/40942_2025_649_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95b2/11948794/e14e522527ee/40942_2025_649_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95b2/11948794/86995c046b6c/40942_2025_649_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95b2/11948794/e14e522527ee/40942_2025_649_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95b2/11948794/86995c046b6c/40942_2025_649_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of different topical anesthetic methods for intravitreal injections: a randomized crossover study.玻璃体内注射不同局部麻醉方法的比较:一项随机交叉研究。
Int J Retina Vitreous. 2025 Mar 26;11(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40942-025-00649-6.
2
Anesthetic effectiveness of topical levobupivacaine 0.75% versus topical proparacaine 0.5% for intravitreal injections.0.75%左旋布比卡因与0.5%丙美卡因用于玻璃体内注射的局部麻醉效果比较
Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Apr;8(2):198-201. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.130713.
3
EFFECT OF ANESTHESIA DURATION ON INTRAVITREAL INJECTION PAIN: A double-blinded, randomized, comparative study.麻醉持续时间对玻璃体腔内注射疼痛的影响:一项双盲、随机、对照研究。
Retina. 2023 Aug 1;43(8):1386-1392. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003824.
4
Diclofenac for pain associated with intravitreal injections: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study.双氯芬酸治疗玻璃体内注射相关疼痛:一项前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec;45(9):867-874. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12988. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
5
Analgesic Effect of Topical Nepafenac 0.1% on Pain Related to Intravitreal Injections: A Randomized Crossover Study.0.1% topical nepafenac对玻璃体内注射相关疼痛的镇痛作用:一项随机交叉研究
Curr Eye Res. 2018 Aug;43(8):1061-1064. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1461908. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
6
Patient pain during intravitreal injections under topical anesthesia: a systematic review.表面麻醉下玻璃体内注射时患者的疼痛:一项系统评价
Int J Retina Vitreous. 2017 Jul 3;3:23. doi: 10.1186/s40942-017-0076-9. eCollection 2017.
7
EFFECT OF BROMFENAC ON PAIN RELATED TO INTRAVITREAL INJECTIONS: A Randomized Crossover Study.溴芬酸对玻璃体内注射相关疼痛的影响:一项随机交叉研究。
Retina. 2017 Feb;37(2):388-395. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001137.
8
Randomized trial of anesthetic methods for intravitreal injections.随机对照试验研究玻璃体腔内注射的麻醉方法。
Retina. 2011 Mar;31(3):535-9. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181eac724.
9
Topical proparacaine eye drops to improve the experience of patients undergoing intravitreal injections: A randomized controlled trial.标题:局部丙胺卡因滴眼剂改善玻璃体腔注射患者体验的随机对照试验。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;30(6):1454-1460. doi: 10.1177/1120672120902026. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
10
Comparison of 3 different anesthetic approaches for intravitreal injections: a prospective randomized trial.玻璃体内注射3种不同麻醉方法的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2015 Jan-Feb;78(1):27-31. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20150008.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Proparacaine, Tetracaine, and Oxybuprocaine in Corneal Sensitivity Measurement.丙美卡因、丁卡因和奥布卡因在角膜敏感性测量中的比较。
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2024 May;40(4):215-221. doi: 10.1089/jop.2023.0148. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
2
Emotional and physical experiences of people with neovascular age-related macular degeneration during the injection process in Germany: a qualitative study.德国接受抗新生血管年龄相关性黄斑变性注射治疗患者的身心体验:一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 15;12(6):e058266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058266.
3
Intravitreal injections: past trends and future projections within a UK tertiary hospital.
玻璃体腔内注射:英国一家三级医院内的过去趋势和未来预测。
Eye (Lond). 2022 Jul;36(7):1373-1378. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01646-3. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
4
Effect of Music on Patient Experience during Intravitreal Injection.音乐对玻璃体内注射期间患者体验的影响。
J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul 30;2020:9120235. doi: 10.1155/2020/9120235. eCollection 2020.
5
Anesthesia for Intravitreal Injection: A Systematic Review.玻璃体内注射的麻醉:一项系统评价。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb 26;14:543-550. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S223530. eCollection 2020.
6
Current Evidence for the Prevention of Endophthalmitis in Anti-VEGF Intravitreal Injections.抗血管内皮生长因子玻璃体内注射预防眼内炎的当前证据
J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul 24;2018:8567912. doi: 10.1155/2018/8567912. eCollection 2018.
7
Analgesic Effect of Topical Nepafenac 0.1% on Pain Related to Intravitreal Injections: A Randomized Crossover Study.0.1% topical nepafenac对玻璃体内注射相关疼痛的镇痛作用:一项随机交叉研究
Curr Eye Res. 2018 Aug;43(8):1061-1064. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1461908. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
8
Intravitreal, Subretinal, and Suprachoroidal Injections: Evolution of Microneedles for Drug Delivery.玻璃体内、视网膜下和脉络膜上注射:药物递送用微针的发展。
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jan/Feb;34(1-2):141-153. doi: 10.1089/jop.2017.0121. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
9
Strategies for Improving Patient Comfort During Intravitreal Injections: Results from a Survey-Based Study.玻璃体内注射期间改善患者舒适度的策略:一项基于调查研究的结果
Ophthalmol Ther. 2016 Dec;5(2):183-190. doi: 10.1007/s40123-016-0058-2. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
10
EFFECT OF BROMFENAC ON PAIN RELATED TO INTRAVITREAL INJECTIONS: A Randomized Crossover Study.溴芬酸对玻璃体内注射相关疼痛的影响:一项随机交叉研究。
Retina. 2017 Feb;37(2):388-395. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001137.