He Zhanyang, Zhang Bin, Ye Binyong, Song Zhanbing, Mei Qiang, Xu Jiahao, Zhu Houwei
College of Physical Education and Health Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321000, China.
Sports Coaching College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China.
Life (Basel). 2025 Mar 12;15(3):447. doi: 10.3390/life15030447.
This study used the Anybody musculoskeletal model to investigate the effects of different neutral postures on the cervical spine and its associated muscle mechanical properties in various gravitational environments. A full-body musculoskeletal model (male, height: 1.74 m, mass: 74 kg) from the AMMR database, developed using the Anybody Modeling System, was employed to perform a quantitative analysis of three postures, including the neutral body posture in microgravity (NBP 0G), the neutral body posture in normal gravity (NBP 1G), and the relaxed standing posture in microgravity (SM 0G). The results showed that, compared to the NBP 1G posture in a gravitational environment, adopting the NBP 0G posture in microgravity resulted in an average reduction of 76.6% in the compressive force of the intervertebral discs, with shear forces in the same direction decreasing by 7.97 to 12.57 N. The shear force direction at the C6-C7 and C7-T1 segments changed, the intervertebral disc height increased by 1.6-4.8%, the disc cross-sectional area expanded by 3.2-6.9%, and the disc volume expanded by 4.8-9.4%. In addition, the total muscle force at the cervical region decreased while the ligament force increased. These changes in mechanical properties may significantly increase the risk of cervical disc herniation and degenerative disc diseases, as well as the risk of muscle atrophy in the neck.
本研究使用Anybody肌肉骨骼模型,以探究在不同重力环境下,不同中立姿势对颈椎及其相关肌肉力学特性的影响。采用通过Anybody建模系统开发的、来自AMMR数据库的全身肌肉骨骼模型(男性,身高:1.74米,体重:74千克),对三种姿势进行定量分析,包括微重力下的中立身体姿势(NBP 0G)、正常重力下的中立身体姿势(NBP 1G)以及微重力下的放松站立姿势(SM 0G)。结果表明,与重力环境下的NBP 1G姿势相比,在微重力下采用NBP 0G姿势可使椎间盘压缩力平均降低76.6%,同一方向的剪切力减少7.97至12.57牛。C6 - C7和C7 - T1节段的剪切力方向发生改变,椎间盘高度增加1.6 - 4.8%,椎间盘横截面积扩大3.2 - 6.9%,椎间盘体积扩大4.8 - 9.4%。此外,颈部区域的总肌肉力量下降,而韧带力量增加。这些力学特性的变化可能会显著增加颈椎间盘突出和椎间盘退变疾病的风险,以及颈部肌肉萎缩的风险。