Suppr超能文献

用于分子检测临床感染和亚临床感染马匹中马流感病毒的鼻拭子、厩舍海绵及空气样本与鼻分泌物的比较

Comparison of Nose Wipes, Stall Sponges, and Air Samples with Nasal Secretions for the Molecular Detection of Equine Influenza Virus in Clinically and Subclinically Infected Horses.

作者信息

Pusterla Nicola, Lawton Kaila, Barnum Samantha, Magdesian K Gary

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

出版信息

Viruses. 2025 Mar 20;17(3):449. doi: 10.3390/v17030449.

Abstract

In recent years, the use of non-invasive host and environmental samples for the detection and monitoring of equine respiratory pathogens has shown promise and a high overall agreement with the gold standard of nasal secretions. The present study looked at comparing nose wipes, stall sponges, and air samples with nasal swabs collected from 27 horses involved in an equine influenza (EI) outbreak. The outbreak involved 5 clinical, 6 subclinical, and 16 uninfected horses. Samples sets were collected at the onset of the index case and retested every 2-3 days thereafter until all horses tested qPCR-negative for EI virus (EIV). Nose wipes and stall sponges identified EIV in all clinical cases, and air samples identified EIV in 4/5 clinical horses. The overall agreement with all nasal swabs collected from clinical cases was 89% for nose wipes, 78% for stall sponges, and 44% for air samples. Due to the shorter shedding time in subclinical cases, nose wipes and stall sponges detected EIV in 5/6 and 4/6 subclinical horses, respectively. Only one single air sample tested qPCR-positive for EIV in a subclinical shedder. When compared to the gold standard of nasal secretions in subclinically infected horses, the overall agreement was 54% for stall sponges, 50% for air samples, and 45% for nose wipes. The collection of non-invasive contact and environmental samples is a promising alternative to nasal swabs for the detection of EIV in clinically and subclinically infected horses. However, they should always be considered as a second-choice sample type to the more accurate nasal swabs and used to test refractory horses or large populations during outbreaks. Further, the pooling of identical or different samples collected from the same horse for the qPCR testing of EIV increases the accuracy of detecting EIV, especially in subclinically infected horses.

摘要

近年来,使用非侵入性的宿主和环境样本检测和监测马呼吸道病原体已显示出前景,并且与鼻分泌物的金标准总体一致性较高。本研究旨在比较鼻拭子、厩舍海绵样本和空气样本与从27匹参与马流感(EI)疫情的马匹采集的鼻拭子。该疫情涉及5匹临床发病马、6匹亚临床感染马和16匹未感染马。在首例病例出现时采集样本组,此后每2 - 3天重新检测一次,直到所有马匹的EI病毒(EIV)qPCR检测呈阴性。鼻拭子和厩舍海绵样本在所有临床病例中均检测到EIV,空气样本在5匹临床发病马中的4匹检测到EIV。与从临床病例采集的所有鼻拭子相比,鼻拭子的总体一致性为89%,厩舍海绵样本为78%,空气样本为44%。由于亚临床病例的排毒时间较短,鼻拭子和厩舍海绵样本分别在6匹亚临床感染马中的5匹和4匹检测到EIV。在一匹亚临床排毒马中,只有一个空气样本的EIV qPCR检测呈阳性。与亚临床感染马的鼻分泌物金标准相比,厩舍海绵样本的总体一致性为54%,空气样本为50%,鼻拭子为45%。采集非侵入性的接触和环境样本是在临床和亚临床感染马中检测EIV的一种有前景的替代鼻拭子的方法。然而,它们应始终被视为比更准确的鼻拭子次一级的样本类型,用于检测难治性马匹或疫情期间的大量马匹。此外,将从同一匹马采集的相同或不同样本合并用于EIV的qPCR检测可提高检测EIV的准确性,尤其是在亚临床感染马中。

相似文献

7
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
10

本文引用的文献

7
Equine Influenza Virus: An Old Known Enemy in the Americas.马流感病毒:美洲的一个老对手。
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Oct 14;10(10):1718. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10101718.
10
Equine influenza: a comprehensive review from etiology to treatment.马流感:从病因到治疗的全面综述。
Anim Health Res Rev. 2021 Jun;22(1):56-71. doi: 10.1017/S1466252321000050. Epub 2021 Jun 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验