Andersen Mads Jønsson, Husted Andreas, Clemmensen Tor Skibsted, Olesen Anne Braae, Baumgartner Jane, Mellemkjær Søren
Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
JHLT Open. 2023 Nov 19;3:100024. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2023.100024. eCollection 2024 Feb.
This study aimed to determine if any cases of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) were missed using routine screening of systemic sclerosis (SSc). We assessed the potential benefits of adding the DETECT algorithm and invasive hemodynamic exercise testing into the local screening process in a Danish single-center cohort without known PAH.
Seventy-three patients with SSc (aged 60 ± 10 years; 56 (77%) females) underwent echocardiography. Among them, 24/73 had an elevated step 2 score of whom 3 had a high risk of pulmonary hypertension on echocardiographic assessment. Four patients declined right heart catheterization. Twenty patients (aged 62 ± 10 years, 13 (65%) females) underwent invasive hemodynamic assessment at rest. Nineteen patients participated in invasive hemodynamic exercise testing.
At rest, 3/20 patients met the 2022 ESC guidelines for PAH (mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) >20 mm Hg, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP) ≤15 mm Hg, and pulmonary vascular resistance >2 Wood units). According to the 2015 ESC guidelines, only 1/19 patients had PAH. During exercise, 18/19 experienced an mPAP of >30 mm Hg, with the majority (13/19) showing an abnormal pulmonary pressure-flow relationship >3 mm Hg/liter/min. Interestingly, 7 out of 9 patients with no pulmonary hypertension (PH) at rest had exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension. One-quarter of the patients had pulmonary hypertension associated with left ventricular dysfunction (group 2 PH, WHO classification).
In a Danish cohort of 73 patients with SSc already undergoing bi-annual PAH screening, applying the DETECT algorithm identified 3 patients meeting the 2022 ESC/ERS guideline criteria for PAH at rest, 1 of whom demonstrated increased PAWP with exercise. However, many patients exhibited an abnormal pulmonary vascular response to exercise and/or signs of group 2 PH.
本研究旨在确定系统性硬化症(SSc)的常规筛查是否遗漏了任何肺动脉高压(PAH)病例。我们评估了在丹麦一个无已知PAH的单中心队列中,将DETECT算法和有创血流动力学运动试验纳入当地筛查流程的潜在益处。
73例SSc患者(年龄60±10岁;56例(77%)为女性)接受了超声心动图检查。其中,24/73患者的二级评分升高,其中3例在超声心动图评估中有肺动脉高压高风险。4例患者拒绝右心导管检查。20例患者(年龄62±10岁,13例(65%)为女性)接受了静息状态下的有创血流动力学评估。19例患者参与了有创血流动力学运动试验。
静息状态下,3/20例患者符合2022年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)PAH指南标准(平均肺动脉压(mPAP)>20 mmHg,肺动脉楔压(PAWP)≤15 mmHg,肺血管阻力>2 Wood单位)。根据2015年ESC指南,仅1/19例患者患有PAH。运动期间,18/19例患者的mPAP>30 mmHg,大多数(13/19)表现出异常的肺压力-流量关系>3 mmHg/升/分钟。有趣的是,9例静息时无肺动脉高压(PH)的患者中有7例出现运动诱发的肺动脉高压。四分之一的患者患有与左心室功能障碍相关的肺动脉高压(WHO分类中的2组PH)。
在丹麦一个已每半年进行一次PAH筛查的73例SSc患者队列中,应用DETECT算法确定了3例符合2022年ESC/欧洲呼吸学会(ERS)静息PAH指南标准的患者,其中1例在运动时PAWP升高。然而,许多患者表现出运动时异常的肺血管反应和/或2组PH的体征。