Daas Merel C, van 't Veer Pieter, Temme Elisabeth H M, Kuijsten Anneleen, Gurinović Mirjana, Biesbroek Sander
Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Centre for Prevention, Lifestyle and Health, Department for Healthy and Sustainable Nutrition, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3721 MA, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Curr Res Food Sci. 2025 Mar 4;10:101019. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2025.101019. eCollection 2025.
Transitioning from animal-based to plant-rich diets could potentially improve both human and planetary health, but a thorough understanding of the protein component in the diet is essential. This research aimed to identify dietary protein patterns in the European adult population and evaluate differences in nutritional quality and environmental sustainability. Individual-level food consumption data were obtained from 25 European countries (40,101 participants, 18-64 years), available from the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database. We applied statistical clustering to classify individuals according to their consumption of 24 protein source food groups. The patterns were evaluated for nutrient requirements, the Nutrient Rich Diet (NRD) 15.3 score, greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) and land use (LU). Six patterns emerged: (42.2%), (19.5%), (14.8%), (12.0%), (9.8%) and (1.6%), with country-specific variations. Most patterns obtained 64-69% of their protein intake from animal products, except for the pattern (52%). The pattern achieved the highest NRD15.3 (+11%), and lowest GHGE (-20%) and LU (-25%) compared to the population average and was most commonly consumed in Austria, Finland, Spain, Portugal and Belgium (4.1-4.5%). The pattern also scored high in nutritional quality (NRD15.3: +9%), whereas the pattern showed higher environmental impacts (GHGE: +5%, LU: +7%). These findings highlight the diversity of dietary protein patterns across Europe, each with unique nutritional profiles and varying environmental impacts. The pattern provides a promising example for healthier, more sustainable diets, but tailored approaches that consider the cultural and demographic contexts of individual countries are needed to optimize health and environmental outcomes for all patterns.
从以动物为基础的饮食过渡到富含植物的饮食可能会改善人类健康和地球健康,但全面了解饮食中的蛋白质成分至关重要。本研究旨在确定欧洲成年人群的膳食蛋白质模式,并评估营养质量和环境可持续性的差异。个体层面的食物消费数据来自25个欧洲国家(40101名参与者,年龄在18 - 64岁之间),可从欧洲食品安全局综合欧洲食物消费数据库获取。我们应用统计聚类方法,根据个体对24种蛋白质来源食物组的消费情况对其进行分类。对这些模式进行了营养需求、营养丰富饮食(NRD)15.3评分、温室气体排放(GHGE)和土地利用(LU)的评估。出现了六种模式:(42.2%)、(19.5%)、(14.8%)、(12.0%)、(9.8%)和(1.6%),存在国家间差异。除了模式(52%)外,大多数模式的蛋白质摄入量的64 - 69%来自动物产品。与总体平均水平相比,模式的NRD15.3得分最高(+11%),GHGE和LU最低(分别为 - 20%和 - 25%),在奥地利、芬兰、西班牙、葡萄牙和比利时最为常见(4.1 - 4.5%)。模式在营养质量方面也得分较高(NRD15.3:+9%),而模式显示出更高的环境影响(GHGE:+5%,LU:+7%)。这些发现突出了欧洲膳食蛋白质模式的多样性,每种模式都有独特的营养特征和不同的环境影响。模式为更健康、更可持续的饮食提供了一个有前景的范例,但需要考虑各个国家文化和人口背景的定制方法,以优化所有模式的健康和环境结果。