• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用基准方法改善欧洲饮食的健康和碳足迹。

Improving health and carbon footprints of European diets using a benchmarking approach.

机构信息

Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AAWageningen, the Netherlands.

TiFN, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2021 Feb;24(3):565-575. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020003341. Epub 2020 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980020003341
PMID:32962783
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7844616/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify diets with improved nutrient quality and environmental impact within the boundaries of dietary practices.

DESIGN

We used Data Envelopment Analysis to benchmark diets for improved adherence to food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG). We then optimised these diets for dietary preferences, nutrient quality and environmental impact. Diets were evaluated using the Nutrient Rich Diet score (NRD15.3), diet-related greenhouse gas emission (GHGE) and a diet similarity index that quantified the proportion of food intake that remained similar as compared with the observed diet.

SETTING

National dietary surveys of four European countries (Denmark, Czech Republic, Italy and France).

SUBJECTS

Approximately 6500 adults, aged 18-64 years.

RESULTS

When dietary preferences were prioritised, NRD15·3 was ~6 % higher, GHGE was ~4 % lower and ~85 % of food intake remained similar. This diet had higher amounts of fruit, vegetables and whole grains than the observed diet. When nutrient quality was prioritised, NRD15·3 was ~16 % higher, GHGE was ~3 % lower and ~72 % of food intake remained similar. This diet had higher amounts of legumes and fish and lower amounts of sweetened and alcoholic beverages. Finally, when environmental impact was prioritised, NRD15·3 was ~9 % higher, GHGE was ~21 % lower and ~73 % of food intake remained similar. In this diet, red and processed meat partly shifted to either eggs, poultry, fish or dairy.

CONCLUSIONS

Benchmark modelling can generate diets with improved adherence to FBDG within the boundaries of dietary practices, but fully maximising health and minimising GHGE cannot be achieved simultaneously.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定在饮食实践范围内具有改善营养质量和环境影响的饮食。

设计

我们使用数据包络分析来为改善对基于食物的膳食指南(FBDG)的依从性的饮食设定基准。然后,我们针对饮食偏好、营养质量和环境影响对这些饮食进行了优化。使用营养素丰富饮食评分(NRD15.3)、与饮食相关的温室气体排放(GHGE)和饮食相似性指数评估饮食,该指数量化了与观察到的饮食相比,摄入的食物比例保持相似的程度。

设置

四个欧洲国家(丹麦、捷克共和国、意大利和法国)的国家饮食调查。

受试者

约 6500 名年龄在 18-64 岁的成年人。

结果

当优先考虑饮食偏好时,NRD15·3 增加了约 6%,GHGE 降低了约 4%,约 85%的食物摄入量保持相似。这种饮食含有更多的水果、蔬菜和全谷物,而观察到的饮食则含有更多的糖和酒精饮料。当优先考虑营养质量时,NRD15·3 增加了约 16%,GHGE 降低了约 3%,约 72%的食物摄入量保持相似。这种饮食含有更多的豆类和鱼类,以及更少的加糖和酒精饮料。最后,当优先考虑环境影响时,NRD15·3 增加了约 9%,GHGE 降低了约 21%,约 73%的食物摄入量保持相似。在这种饮食中,红肉和加工肉部分被鸡蛋、家禽、鱼类或乳制品所取代。

结论

基准建模可以生成在饮食实践范围内具有改善 FBDG 依从性的饮食,但不能同时最大限度地提高健康和最小化 GHGE。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf7/7844616/ecdc5f0dcf12/S1368980020003341_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf7/7844616/7b2cae0c970a/S1368980020003341_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf7/7844616/16507217a884/S1368980020003341_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf7/7844616/ecdc5f0dcf12/S1368980020003341_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf7/7844616/7b2cae0c970a/S1368980020003341_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf7/7844616/16507217a884/S1368980020003341_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bf7/7844616/ecdc5f0dcf12/S1368980020003341_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving health and carbon footprints of European diets using a benchmarking approach.利用基准方法改善欧洲饮食的健康和碳足迹。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Feb;24(3):565-575. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020003341. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
2
Carbon footprint of self-selected US diets: nutritional, demographic, and behavioral correlates.美国自选饮食的碳足迹:营养、人口统计学和行为相关性。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 Mar 1;109(3):526-534. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy327.
3
Geographic and socioeconomic diversity of food and nutrient intakes: a comparison of four European countries.食物和营养素摄入量的地理和社会经济多样性:四个欧洲国家的比较。
Eur J Nutr. 2019 Jun;58(4):1475-1493. doi: 10.1007/s00394-018-1673-6. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
4
Dietary changes needed to improve diet sustainability: are they similar across Europe?改善饮食可持续性所需的饮食变化:它们在欧洲各地是否相似?
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018 Jul;72(7):951-960. doi: 10.1038/s41430-017-0080-z. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
5
Greenhouse gas emissions of self-selected diets in the UK and their association with diet quality: is energy under-reporting a problem?英国自选饮食的温室气体排放及其与饮食质量的关系:能量低报是一个问题吗?
Nutr J. 2018 Feb 21;17(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12937-018-0338-x.
6
Greenhouse gas emission of diets in the Netherlands and associations with food, energy and macronutrient intakes.荷兰饮食的温室气体排放及其与食物、能量和常量营养素摄入量的关联。
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Sep;18(13):2433-45. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014002821. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
7
Adherence to dietary recommendations for Swedish adults across categories of greenhouse gas emissions from food.遵循瑞典成年人在食物温室气体排放类别方面的饮食建议。
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Dec;20(18):3381-3393. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017002300. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
8
Greenhouse gas emissions and the Australian diet--comparing dietary recommendations with average intakes.温室气体排放与澳大利亚饮食——比较饮食建议与平均摄入量。
Nutrients. 2014 Jan 8;6(1):289-303. doi: 10.3390/nu6010289.
9
Cooking at Home, Fast Food, Meat Consumption, and Dietary Carbon Footprint among US Adults.在家烹饪、快餐、肉类消费与美国成年人的饮食碳足迹。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 13;19(2):853. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020853.
10
Achieving dietary recommendations and reducing greenhouse gas emissions: modelling diets to minimise the change from current intakes.实现饮食建议并减少温室气体排放:对饮食进行建模以尽量减少与当前摄入量的差异。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Apr 7;13:46. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0370-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Nutrient quality, environmental impact, and cost of Chinese diets: a benchmarking optimization approach.中国饮食的营养质量、环境影响及成本:一种基准优化方法。
Eur J Nutr. 2025 Aug 19;64(6):261. doi: 10.1007/s00394-025-03775-x.
2
Environmental Impact of Current Diets and Alternative Dietary Scenarios Worldwide: A Systematic Review.全球当前饮食及替代饮食方案的环境影响:一项系统综述
Nutr Rev. 2025 Sep 1;83(9):1678-1710. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuae215.
3
Trajectories of Nutritional Quality, Diet-Related Environmental Impact, and Diet Cost in China: How Much Does Ultra-Processed Food and Drink Consumption Matter?

本文引用的文献

1
Could Dietary Goals and Climate Change Mitigation Be Achieved Through Optimized Diet? The Experience of Modeling the National Food Consumption Data in Italy.能否通过优化饮食实现饮食目标与缓解气候变化?意大利国家食品消费数据建模经验
Front Nutr. 2020 May 4;7:48. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.00048. eCollection 2020.
2
Designing healthier and acceptable diets using data envelopment analysis.运用数据包络分析设计更健康且可接受的饮食。
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Sep;23(13):2290-2302. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019004774. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
3
SHARP-Indicators Database towards a public database for environmental sustainability.
中国营养质量、饮食相关环境影响及饮食成本的变化轨迹:超加工食品和饮料消费的影响有多大?
Nutrients. 2025 Jan 17;17(2):334. doi: 10.3390/nu17020334.
4
MUSAE: Fusion of art and technology to address challenges in food and health.MUSAE:融合艺术与技术以应对食品和健康领域的挑战。
Nutr Bull. 2025 Mar;50(1):120-131. doi: 10.1111/nbu.12723. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
5
Integrating environmental sustainability into food-based dietary guidelines in the Nordic countries.将环境可持续性纳入北欧国家基于食物的膳食指南。
Food Nutr Res. 2024 Oct 25;68. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v68.10792. eCollection 2024.
6
Exploring healthy and climate-friendly diets for Danish adults: an optimization study using quadratic programming.探索丹麦成年人健康且气候友好型饮食:一项使用二次规划的优化研究。
Front Nutr. 2023 Jun 15;10:1158257. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1158257. eCollection 2023.
7
Toward healthy and sustainable diets for the 21st century: Importance of sociocultural and economic considerations.迈向 21 世纪的健康和可持续饮食:社会文化和经济因素的重要性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jun 27;120(26):e2219272120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2219272120. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
8
The Potential of Food Fortification as an Enabler of More Environmentally Sustainable, Nutritionally Adequate Diets.食品强化作为实现更环境可持续、营养充足饮食的一种手段的潜力。
Nutrients. 2023 May 25;15(11):2473. doi: 10.3390/nu15112473.
9
Shifting towards optimized healthy and sustainable Dutch diets: impact on protein quality.向优化的健康和可持续的荷兰饮食转变:对蛋白质质量的影响。
Eur J Nutr. 2023 Aug;62(5):2115-2128. doi: 10.1007/s00394-023-03135-7. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
10
Dietitians Australia position statement on healthy and sustainable diets.澳大利亚营养师协会关于健康和可持续饮食的立场声明。
Nutr Diet. 2022 Feb;79(1):6-27. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12726.
SHARP指标数据库致力于打造一个环境可持续性公共数据库。
Data Brief. 2019 Oct 7;27:104617. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104617. eCollection 2019 Dec.
4
Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.人类世的食物:EAT-柳叶刀可持续食物系统健康饮食委员会
Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):447-492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
5
Mathematical Optimization to Explore Tomorrow's Sustainable Diets: A Narrative Review.数学优化探索明天的可持续饮食:叙事评论。
Adv Nutr. 2018 Sep 1;9(5):602-616. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmy049.
6
A Review of the Use of Linear Programming to Optimize Diets, Nutritiously, Economically and Environmentally.关于使用线性规划从营养、经济和环境方面优化饮食的综述。
Front Nutr. 2018 Jun 21;5:48. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2018.00048. eCollection 2018.
7
Dietary taste patterns by sex and weight status in the Netherlands.荷兰的性别和体重状态的饮食口味模式。
Br J Nutr. 2018 May;119(10):1195-1206. doi: 10.1017/S0007114518000715.
8
Geographic and socioeconomic diversity of food and nutrient intakes: a comparison of four European countries.食物和营养素摄入量的地理和社会经济多样性:四个欧洲国家的比较。
Eur J Nutr. 2019 Jun;58(4):1475-1493. doi: 10.1007/s00394-018-1673-6. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
9
Dietary changes needed to improve diet sustainability: are they similar across Europe?改善饮食可持续性所需的饮食变化:它们在欧洲各地是否相似?
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018 Jul;72(7):951-960. doi: 10.1038/s41430-017-0080-z. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
10
Decreasing the overall environmental impact of the Dutch diet: how to find healthy and sustainable diets with limited changes.降低荷兰饮食对整体环境的影响:如何在有限的改变下找到健康且可持续的饮食方式。
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Jun;20(9):1699-1709. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017000349. Epub 2017 Mar 20.