• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Envisioning Tools to Help Classify Type 1 Diabetes and Type 2 Diabetes in New-Onset Adult Diabetes.设想用于帮助对新诊断成年糖尿病患者的1型糖尿病和2型糖尿病进行分类的工具。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Mar 28:19322968251329055. doi: 10.1177/19322968251329055.
2
The health economics of insulin therapy: How do we address the rising demands, costs, inequalities and barriers to achieving optimal outcomes.胰岛素治疗的卫生经济学:我们如何应对不断增长的需求、成本、不平等现象以及实现最佳治疗效果的障碍。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jul;27 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):24-35. doi: 10.1111/dom.16488. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
3
What do the guidelines say about use of biosimilar insulin therapy? Simple practical considerations to guide clinicians in different patient subgroups-Sharing Canadian perspectives.关于生物类似物胰岛素疗法的使用,指南是怎么说的?指导不同患者亚组临床医生的简单实用考量——分享加拿大的观点。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Feb 27. doi: 10.1111/dom.16278.
4
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
5
The Changing Epidemiology of Type 1 Diabetes: A Global Perspective.1型糖尿病不断变化的流行病学:全球视角
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1111/dom.16501.
6
Biomarkers as point-of-care tests to guide prescription of antibiotics in people with acute respiratory infections in primary care.生物标志物作为即时检测手段,指导初级保健中急性呼吸道感染患者使用抗生素的处方。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 17;10(10):CD010130. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010130.pub3.
7
Relative contribution of type 1 and type 2 diabetes loci to the genetic etiology of adult-onset, non-insulin-requiring autoimmune diabetes.1型和2型糖尿病基因座对成人发病、非胰岛素依赖型自身免疫性糖尿病遗传病因的相对贡献。
BMC Med. 2017 Apr 25;15(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0846-0.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
Indirect comparative efficacy and safety of tirzepatide 10 and 15 mg versus semaglutide 2.4 mg for the management of obesity and overweight in patients with type 2 diabetes.替尔泊肽10毫克和15毫克与司美格鲁肽2.4毫克治疗2型糖尿病患者肥胖和超重的间接比较疗效与安全性
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1111/dom.16508.
10
Health economic considerations of screening for early type 1 diabetes.1型糖尿病早期筛查的卫生经济学考量
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1111/dom.16522.

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction of metabolic subphenotypes of type 2 diabetes via continuous glucose monitoring and machine learning.通过持续葡萄糖监测和机器学习预测2型糖尿病的代谢亚表型
Nat Biomed Eng. 2024 Dec 23. doi: 10.1038/s41551-024-01311-6.
2
2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.2. 糖尿病的诊断与分类:《2025年糖尿病防治标准》
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan 1;48(Supplement_1):S27-S49. doi: 10.2337/dc25-S002.
3
Hyperglycemic Crises in Adults With Diabetes: A Consensus Report.成人糖尿病高血糖危象:共识报告。
Diabetes Care. 2024 Aug 1;47(8):1257-1275. doi: 10.2337/dci24-0032.
4
High Prevalence of Ketosis-Prone Diabetes in Children with Type 2 Diabetes and Diabetic Ketoacidosis at Diagnosis: Evidence from the Rare and Atypical Diabetes Network (RADIANT).2 型糖尿病及糖尿病酮症酸中毒患儿中酮症倾向糖尿病的高发率:罕见及非典型糖尿病网络(RADIANT)研究证据。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2024;2024. doi: 10.1155/2024/5907924. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
5
Inaccurate diagnosis of diabetes type in youth: prevalence, characteristics, and implications.青少年糖尿病类型诊断不准确:患病率、特征及意义。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 17;14(1):8876. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58927-6.
6
Classification of type 1 diabetes: A pathogenic and treatment-based classification.1 型糖尿病的分类:基于发病机制和治疗的分类。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2024 Mar;18(3):102986. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2024.102986. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
7
Double diabetes-when type 1 diabetes meets type 2 diabetes: definition, pathogenesis and recognition.双重糖尿病——当 1 型糖尿病遇见 2 型糖尿病:定义、发病机制与识别。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Feb 10;23(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02145-x.
8
Atypical Diabetes: What Have We Learned and What Does the Future Hold?非典型糖尿病:我们有何了解,未来前景如何?
Diabetes Care. 2024 May 1;47(5):770-781. doi: 10.2337/dci23-0038.
9
Identifying top ten predictors of type 2 diabetes through machine learning analysis of UK Biobank data.通过对英国生物库数据的机器学习分析,确定 2 型糖尿病的十大预测因子。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 24;14(1):2102. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52023-5.
10
Benefits and risks of drug combination therapy for diabetes mellitus and its complications: a comprehensive review.糖尿病及其并发症药物联合治疗的获益与风险:全面综述。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Dec 19;14:1301093. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1301093. eCollection 2023.

设想用于帮助对新诊断成年糖尿病患者的1型糖尿病和2型糖尿病进行分类的工具。

Envisioning Tools to Help Classify Type 1 Diabetes and Type 2 Diabetes in New-Onset Adult Diabetes.

作者信息

Ayers Alessandra T, Ho Cindy N, Billings Liana K, Misra Shivani, Klonoff David C

机构信息

Diabetes Technology Society, Burlingame, CA, USA.

Department of Medicine, Endeavor Health, Skokie, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Mar 28:19322968251329055. doi: 10.1177/19322968251329055.

DOI:10.1177/19322968251329055
PMID:40152433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11954134/
Abstract

A tool is needed to distinguish type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) in adults with new-onset diabetes because correct classification is needed for correct diagnoses and treatments. Current classification methods are usually applied to biomarkers using binary or quantitative classification with a cut point and may not be adequately nuanced. Combinations of clinical features are not necessarily specific for classifying and may not always indicate a single diagnosis. A probabilistic decision tree classification tool with multiple branches per decision node is needed for adults with new-onset diabetes to avoid misdiagnosis of actual T1D as T2D, misdiagnosis of actual T2D or monogenic diabetes as T1D, and misclassified patients in future population health studies which will lead to incorrect conclusions and suboptimal patient outcomes.

摘要

需要一种工具来区分成年新发糖尿病患者的1型糖尿病(T1D)和2型糖尿病(T2D),因为正确的分类对于正确的诊断和治疗是必要的。当前的分类方法通常使用具有切点的二元或定量分类应用于生物标志物,可能不够细致入微。临床特征的组合不一定对分类具有特异性,并且可能并不总是表明单一诊断。成年新发糖尿病患者需要一种每个决策节点有多个分支的概率决策树分类工具,以避免将实际的T1D误诊为T2D,将实际的T2D或单基因糖尿病误诊为T1D,以及在未来的人群健康研究中对患者进行错误分类,这将导致错误的结论和次优的患者结局。