Suppr超能文献

波兰城乡地区女性对激素避孕知识的比较。

A comparison of the knowledge of hormonal contraception between women living in urban and rural areas of Poland.

作者信息

Witkoś Joanna, Hartman-Petrycka Magdalena, Błażejewski Grzegorz

机构信息

Collegium Medicum, Department of Health Science, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Kraków, Poland.

Department of Basic Biomedical Science, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Sosnowiec, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Mar 28;20(3):e0320261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320261. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

The Contraception Policy Atlas and its latest 2024 study shows that the availability of contraception in Poland is a meagre 33.5%, the lowest of all European countries. The aim of the research, therefore, was to assess and compare the knowledge of women, living in rural and urban areas of Poland, about the modern methods of the hormonal contraception (HC) they use, includes all hormonal methods (pill, implant, patch, etc.). The study involved 239 women. The research was conducted using an online survey distributed to the public via community forums. The most commonly used method of HC was the combined pill, with 62.27% of the women surveyed using this type of contraception. None of the women surveyed used the emergency contraceptive pill. This finding is concerning given the broader context of contraceptive use in Poland. There were differences in the reasons for contraceptive use according to the place of residence. Women living in rural areas were less likely to use HC to relieve menstrual pain (28.81%) than those living in small and medium-sized towns (47.87%), and also less likely to use HC to regulate their menstrual cycle (27.12%) than those living in small and medium-sized towns (42.55%). Despite the fact that all the women who participated in this study were using HC, 13.39% stated that they did not know how this type of medication affects the female body. There was a tendency for women living in rural areas (20.34%) to be more likely to say 'don't know' than the women from large towns (9.20%). The most commonly indicated side effect of contraceptives on the female body was an increased risk of thromboembolic events (70.71%).

摘要

《避孕政策地图集》及其2024年的最新研究表明,波兰的避孕用品可及率仅为33.5%,是所有欧洲国家中最低的。因此,该研究的目的是评估和比较生活在波兰农村和城市地区的女性对她们所使用的激素避孕(HC)现代方法的了解,其中包括所有激素方法(避孕药、植入剂、贴片等)。该研究涉及239名女性。研究通过在社区论坛上向公众分发的在线调查问卷进行。最常用的HC方法是复方避孕药,62.27%的受访女性使用这种避孕方式。没有一名受访女性使用紧急避孕药。鉴于波兰更广泛的避孕使用背景,这一发现令人担忧。根据居住地点的不同,避孕使用的原因也存在差异。与生活在中小城镇的女性(47.87%)相比,农村地区的女性使用HC缓解痛经的可能性较小(28.81%),使用HC调节月经周期的可能性也较小(27.12%),而生活在中小城镇的女性这一比例为42.55%。尽管参与本研究的所有女性都在使用HC,但13.39%的女性表示她们不知道这类药物如何影响女性身体。农村地区的女性(20.34%)比大城市的女性(9.20%)更倾向于回答“不知道”。避孕药对女性身体最常指出的副作用是血栓栓塞事件风险增加(70.71%)。

相似文献

3
Changes in contraceptive use in Vietnam.越南避孕措施使用情况的变化。
J Biosoc Sci. 2003 Oct;35(4):527-43. doi: 10.1017/s0021932003005923.

本文引用的文献

5
Intersections between culture, contraception, knowledge and the body in the USA.美国文化、避孕、知识和身体之间的交集。
Cult Health Sex. 2023 Sep;25(9):1164-1179. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2022.2141330. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
7
Hormonal contraception and mood disorders.激素避孕与情绪障碍。
Aust Prescr. 2022 Jun;45(3):75-79. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2022.025. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
8
Systemic hormonal contraception and risk of venous thromboembolism.系统激素避孕与静脉血栓栓塞风险。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Aug;101(8):846-855. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14384. Epub 2022 May 27.
9
Contraception e-learning for medical students.
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2022 Jul;48(3):231-232. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201401. Epub 2021 Dec 23.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验