• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同景深人工晶状体光学性能的比较。

Comparison of optical performances of intraocular lenses with different depth of field.

作者信息

Tommasi Federico, Giorgetti Alessio, Monnetti Caterina, Fini Lorenzo, Romualdi Giovanni, Mencucci Rita, Gurioli Massimo, Cavalieri Stefano

机构信息

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Florence, via Giovanni Sansone 1, Fiorentino 50019 Sesto, Italy.

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Florence, via Giovanni Sansone 1, Fiorentino 50019 Sesto, Italy.

出版信息

J Optom. 2025 Apr-Jun;18(2):100546. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2025.100546. Epub 2025 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.optom.2025.100546
PMID:40158385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11995738/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study presents a detailed optical characterization of three intraocular lenses (IOLs) comparing two so called "enhanced range of field", Evolux IOL and Tecnis Eyhance IOL and one so called "narrow range of field", a standard monofocal IOL Acrysof IQ.

METHODS

The measurements are performed using the PMTF optical bench, basing on the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) to evaluate the optical performance of each lens. The MTFa, representing the area under the MTF curve, is utilized as a key and synthetic metric to quantify performance across different spatial frequencies, providing insights into the IOLs' behavior as defocus varies.

RESULTS

The results highlight the strengths and the weaknesses of the IOLs, with the Evolux showing a broadest depth of focus. The USAF resolution target is used to qualitatively assess the image reproduction at far, intermediate, and near distances, offering a visual representation of the IOLs' capabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide valuable information for selecting IOLs based on patient-specific visual requirements in cataract and refractive surgery.

摘要

目的

本研究对三种人工晶状体(IOL)进行了详细的光学特性分析,比较了两种所谓的“扩大景深”人工晶状体,即Evolux人工晶状体和Tecnis Eyhance人工晶状体,以及一种所谓的“窄景深”人工晶状体,即标准单焦点Acrysof IQ人工晶状体。

方法

使用PMTF光学平台进行测量,基于调制传递函数(MTF)来评估每个晶状体的光学性能。MTFa代表MTF曲线下的面积,被用作一个关键的综合指标来量化不同空间频率下的性能,从而深入了解人工晶状体在散焦变化时的表现。

结果

结果突出了人工晶状体的优点和缺点,其中Evolux人工晶状体的景深最宽。使用美国空军分辨率靶标对远、中、近距离的图像再现进行定性评估,直观展示了人工晶状体的性能。

结论

这些发现为白内障和屈光手术中根据患者特定的视觉需求选择人工晶状体提供了有价值的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a17/11995738/b57420acf799/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a17/11995738/7a786e7e2d93/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a17/11995738/96f2498bc28d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a17/11995738/6bf22d28d626/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a17/11995738/b57420acf799/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a17/11995738/7a786e7e2d93/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a17/11995738/96f2498bc28d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a17/11995738/6bf22d28d626/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a17/11995738/b57420acf799/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of optical performances of intraocular lenses with different depth of field.不同景深人工晶状体光学性能的比较。
J Optom. 2025 Apr-Jun;18(2):100546. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2025.100546. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
2
[ optical assessment of three types of non-diffractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses].[三种非衍射型扩展焦深人工晶状体的光学评估]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Jun 11;60(6):494-502. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20240226-00082.
3
Analysis of the optical performance of intraocular lenses using profilometric measurements.使用轮廓测量法分析人工晶状体的光学性能。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb;263(2):451-465. doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06628-1. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
4
Effect of decentration and tilt on the in vitro optical quality of monofocal and trifocal intraocular lenses.离焦和倾斜对单焦点和三焦点人工晶状体体外光学质量的影响。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct;262(10):3229-3242. doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06490-1. Epub 2024 Apr 21.
5
Through-Focus Optical Bench Performance of Extended Depth-of-Focus and Bifocal Intraocular Lenses Compared to a Monofocal Lens.与单焦点人工晶状体相比,扩展景深和双焦点人工晶状体的全焦距光学平台性能
J Refract Surg. 2018 Apr 1;34(4):236-243. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20180206-04.
6
Assessment of the image quality of extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens models in polychromatic light.评估多色光下扩展景深人工晶状体模型的图像质量。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Jan;46(1):108-115. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000037.
7
Prospective comparative study of tolerance to refractive errors after implantation of extended depth of focus and monofocal intraocular lenses with identical aspheric platform in Korean population.韩国人群中扩展景深和单焦点人工晶状体在相同非球面平台植入术后对屈光误差的耐受性前瞻性对比研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug 19;19(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1193-z.
8
[Optical benchtop evaluation of special intraocular lens optics].[特殊人工晶状体光学部的光学台面评估]
Ophthalmologie. 2024 Sep;121(9):698-705. doi: 10.1007/s00347-024-02064-y. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
9
Comparison of 3-month clinical outcomes between two enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses: A single-center prospective study.两种增强型单焦点人工晶状体3个月临床结果的比较:一项单中心前瞻性研究。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2025 May;35(3):922-929. doi: 10.1177/11206721241298031. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
10
Comparison of an aspheric monofocal intraocular lens with the new generation monofocal lens using defocus curve.比较非球面单焦点人工晶状体与新一代单焦点人工晶状体的离焦曲线。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec;68(12):3025-3029. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_985_20.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of 3-month clinical outcomes between two enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses: A single-center prospective study.两种增强型单焦点人工晶状体3个月临床结果的比较:一项单中心前瞻性研究。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2025 May;35(3):922-929. doi: 10.1177/11206721241298031. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
2
Evidence-based functional classification of simultaneous vision intraocular lenses: seeking a global consensus by the ESCRS Functional Vision Working Group.基于证据的同时视人工晶状体功能分类:欧洲白内障与屈光手术学会功能视觉工作组寻求全球共识
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 Aug 1;50(8):794-798. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001502.
3
Should enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses be the standard of care? An evidence-based appraisal by the ESCRS Functional Vision Working Group.
增强型单焦点人工晶状体应成为护理标准吗?欧洲白内障与屈光手术学会功能性视力工作组的循证评估
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 Aug 1;50(8):789-793. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001479.
4
Optical Bench Evaluation of the Latest Refractive Enhanced Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens.最新屈光性增强景深人工晶状体的光具座评估
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 3;18:1921-1932. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S469849. eCollection 2024.
5
Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lenses: A Retrospective, Comparative Study between Three Different Models.增强型单焦点人工晶状体:三种不同型号的回顾性比较研究
J Clin Med. 2023 May 21;12(10):3588. doi: 10.3390/jcm12103588.
6
Comparison of Five Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses: Optical-Bench Assessment with Visual-Quality Simulation.五种矫正老花眼的人工晶状体的比较:视觉质量模拟的光学平台评估
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 27;12(7):2523. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072523.
7
Positioning of enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses between conventional monofocal and extended depth of focus lenses: a scoping review.增强型单焦点人工晶状体在常规单焦点和扩展景深人工晶状体之间的定位:范围综述。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar 14;23(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-02844-1.
8
Depth of focus of four novel extended range of vision intraocular lenses.四种新型远视力人工晶状体的焦深
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan;33(1):257-261. doi: 10.1177/11206721221125081. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
9
A comparison of clinical outcomes and optical performance between monofocal and new monofocal with enhanced intermediate function intraocular lenses: a case-control study.单焦点和新的具有增强中间功能的单焦点人工晶状体的临床结果和光学性能比较:病例对照研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Oct 16;21(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-02124-w.
10
Optical Performance of a Monofocal Intraocular Lens Designed to Extend Depth of Focus.单焦点人工晶状体的光学性能可扩展焦点深度。
J Refract Surg. 2020 Sep 1;36(9):625-632. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20200710-01.