Suppr超能文献

评估多色光下扩展景深人工晶状体模型的图像质量。

Assessment of the image quality of extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens models in polychromatic light.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, the David J Apple Center for Vision Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Jan;46(1):108-115. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000037.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The use of monochromatic light in the assessment of intraocular lenses (IOLs) has been criticized for not representing the real-world situation. This study aimed to measure and compare the image quality of 3 extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOL models in monochromatic and polychromatic light.

SETTING

David J Apple Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.

DESIGN

In vitro study.

METHODS

An optical metrology instrument was used to study image quality metrics of diffractive IOLs with chromatic aberration correction (Symfony and AT Lara) and a refractive lens (Mini Well). The modulation transfer function (MTF) was measured in green and polychromatic light at a 2.0 mm, 3.0 mm, and 4.0 mm aperture. The EDOF IOL's tolerance to defocus was tested against a monofocal lens.

RESULTS

The mean MTF of the EDOF IOL at far distance was decreased in polychromatic compared with monochromatic light. The largest effect was found in the refractive lens; however, at intermediate distance, only small differences occurred. In their tolerance to defocus, the EDOF IOLs were superior to the monofocal IOL. The diffractive IOL had higher MTFs than that of the refractive IOL at 2 primary foci, the refractive IOL's optical quality varied less with defocus at 3.0 mm. The refractive lens was the most susceptible to changes in aperture size.

CONCLUSION

The diffractive EDOF IOL was more resistant to chromatic effects than the refractive IOL. The EDOF IOLs provided an extended through-focus performance compared with the monofocal IOL, but differences in optical design, particularly pupil dependency, should be considered when refining IOL selection for patients.

摘要

目的

单色光在评估人工晶状体(IOL)中的应用因不能代表实际情况而受到批评。本研究旨在测量和比较 3 种扩展景深(EDOF)IOL 模型在单色和多色光下的图像质量。

地点

德国海德堡 David J Apple 实验室。

设计

体外研究。

方法

使用光学计量仪器研究具有色差矫正功能的衍射 IOL(Symfony 和 AT Lara)和折射透镜(Mini Well)的图像质量指标。在 2.0mm、3.0mm 和 4.0mm 孔径下,在绿光和多色光下测量调制传递函数(MTF)。测试 EDOF IOL 对离焦的容差,与单焦点透镜进行对比。

结果

远距 EDOF IOL 的平均 MTF 在多色光下比单色光下降低。折射透镜的影响最大,但在中间距离仅发生较小差异。在对离焦的容差方面,EDOF IOL 优于单焦点 IOL。在 2 个主要焦点处,衍射 IOL 的 MTF 高于折射 IOL;在 3.0mm 时,折射 IOL 的光学质量随离焦变化较小。折射透镜对孔径大小的变化最敏感。

结论

与折射 IOL 相比,衍射 EDOF IOL 对色差的影响更小。EDOF IOL 与单焦点 IOL 相比提供了扩展的焦点性能,但在为患者选择 IOL 时,应考虑光学设计的差异,特别是瞳孔依赖性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验