Hong Shuning, Chi Mengjiao, Chen Haisi, Chu Fengfeng, Zheng Yuping, Tao Ming
Second Clinical Medical School, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Affiliated Mental Health Center & Hangzhou Seventh People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 14;16:1524046. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1524046. eCollection 2025.
We aimed to investigate the metacognition of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and its correlation with their condition, as well as explore its diagnostic significance in the early stages of the disease, thereby providing a reference for clinical treatment.
Using a cross-sectional research design, we selected 66 patients diagnosed with MDD and 99 healthy controls for a mental rotation task; we examined their metacognitive performance using a post-decisional confidence assessment paradigm. We evaluated various aspects, including their performance on first-order tasks (d'), metacognitive bias (average confidence), metacognitive sensitivity (meta-d'), metacognitive efficiency (the M Ratio).
In terms of the first-order task performance (d'), the group with MDD scored significantly lower than the healthy controls (t = -4.274, p < 0.001, respectively). Regarding metacognitive bias(average confidence), metacognitive sensitivity (meta-d'), and metacognitive efficiency (the M ratio), the group with MDD performed significantly worse than the healthy controls (t = -4.280, p < 0.001; t = -3.540, p < 0.001; t = -2.104, p = 0.039, respectively). In addition, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17) scores of the patients with MDD were significantly negatively correlated with their d', average confidence levels, meta-d', and M ratio(r = -0.468, p < 0.001; r = -0.601, p < 0.001;r = -0.457, p < 0.001; r = -0.362, p = 0.003), The average confidence levels of MDD patients are significantly positively correlated with d', meta-d', and M ratio. (r = -0.552, p < 0.001; r = 0.738, p < 0.001;r =0.273, p =0.02).
The metacognitive abilities of patients with MDD were significantly impaired, and the degree of metacognitive impairment was related to the severity of clinical depressive symptoms. Moreover, the impairment of their metacognitive abilities was correlated with negative metacognitive bias.
https://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2400091242.
本研究旨在探讨重度抑郁症(MDD)患者的元认知及其与病情的相关性,并探索其在疾病早期阶段的诊断意义,从而为临床治疗提供参考。
采用横断面研究设计,选取66例诊断为MDD的患者和99例健康对照者进行心理旋转任务;使用决策后信心评估范式检查他们的元认知表现。我们评估了各个方面,包括他们在一阶任务上的表现(d')、元认知偏差(平均信心)、元认知敏感性(元d')、元认知效率(M比率)。
在一阶任务表现(d')方面,MDD组得分显著低于健康对照组(t = -4.274,p < 0.001)。在元认知偏差(平均信心)、元认知敏感性(元d')和元认知效率(M比率)方面,MDD组的表现显著差于健康对照组(t = -4.280,p < 0.001;t = -3.540,p < 0.001;t = -2.104,p = 0.039)。此外,MDD患者的汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD - 17)得分与他们的d'、平均信心水平、元d'和M比率显著负相关(r = -0.468,p < 0.001;r = -0.601,p < 0.001;r = -0.457,p < 0.001;r = -0.362,p = 0.003),MDD患者的平均信心水平与d'、元d'和M比率显著正相关(r = -0.552,p < 0.001;r = 0.738,p < 0.001;r = 0.273,p = 0.02)。
MDD患者的元认知能力显著受损,元认知受损程度与临床抑郁症状的严重程度相关。此外,他们的元认知能力受损与负性元认知偏差相关。