Vyas Heema Kumari Nilesh, Hoque M Mozammel, Xia Binbin, Alam David, Cullen Patrick J, Rice Scott A, Mai-Prochnow Anne
School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
The Sydney Institute for Infectious Diseases, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Biofilm. 2025 Feb 27;9:100266. doi: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2025.100266. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Biofilm formation on surfaces, tools and equipment can damage their quality and lead to high repair or replacement costs. Plasma-activated water (PAW), a new technology, has shown promise in killing biofilm and non-biofilm bacteria due to reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS), particularly superoxide. However, the exact genetic mechanisms behind PAW's effectiveness against biofilms remain unclear. Here, we examined the stress responses of biofilms exposed to sub-lethal PAW treatment using bulk RNA sequencing and transcriptomics. We compared gene expression in PAW-treated biofilms with and without superoxide removal, achieved by adding the scavenger Tiron. Biofilms treated with PAW exhibited a 40 % variation in gene expression compared to those treated with PAW-Tiron and controls. Specifically, PAW treatment resulted in 478 upregulated genes (>1.5 logFC) and 186 downregulated genes (<-1.5 logFC) compared to the control. Pathway and biological process enrichment analysis revealed significant upregulation of genes involved in sulfur metabolism, ATP-binding transporter, amino acid metabolism, hypochlorite response systems and oxidative phosphorylation in PAW-treated biofilms compared to control. Biofilm viability and intracellular RONS accumulation were tested for mutants lacking key genes from these pathways. Knockout mutants of thioredoxin (), thiosulfate-binding proteins (), and NADH dehydrogenase subunit () showed significantly reduced biofilm viability after PAW treatment. Notably, biofilms had the highest intracellular ROS accumulation, as revealed by 2',7'-dichlorofluorescin diacetate staining after PAW treatment. This confirms the importance of these genes in managing oxidative stress caused by PAW and highlights the significance of superoxide in PAW's bactericidal effects. Overall, our findings shed light on the specific genes and pathways that help biofilms survive and respond to PAW treatment, offering a new understanding of plasma technology and its anti-biofilm mechanisms.
生物膜在表面、工具和设备上形成会损害其质量,并导致高昂的维修或更换成本。等离子体活化水(PAW)作为一项新技术,由于活性氧和氮物种(RONS),特别是超氧化物,在杀灭生物膜细菌和非生物膜细菌方面显示出前景。然而,PAW对生物膜有效性背后的确切遗传机制仍不清楚。在这里,我们使用大量RNA测序和转录组学研究了暴露于亚致死剂量PAW处理的生物膜的应激反应。我们比较了添加清除剂钛铁试剂去除超氧化物前后PAW处理的生物膜中的基因表达。与PAW-钛铁试剂处理的生物膜和对照相比,PAW处理的生物膜基因表达有40%的差异。具体而言,与对照相比,PAW处理导致478个基因上调(>1.5 logFC)和186个基因下调(<-1.5 logFC)。通路和生物学过程富集分析表明,与对照相比,PAW处理的生物膜中参与硫代谢、ATP结合转运蛋白、氨基酸代谢、次氯酸盐反应系统和氧化磷酸化的基因显著上调。对缺乏这些通路关键基因的突变体进行了生物膜活力和细胞内RONS积累测试。硫氧还蛋白()、硫代硫酸盐结合蛋白()和NADH脱氢酶亚基()的敲除突变体在PAW处理后生物膜活力显著降低。值得注意的是,PAW处理后,2',7'-二氯荧光素二乙酸酯染色显示生物膜细胞内ROS积累最高。这证实了这些基因在应对PAW引起的氧化应激中的重要性,并突出了超氧化物在PAW杀菌作用中的重要性。总体而言,我们的研究结果揭示了帮助生物膜存活并对PAW处理作出反应的特定基因和通路,为等离子体技术及其抗生物膜机制提供了新的认识。