Candela-Leal Milton O, Alanis-Espinosa Myriam, Murrieta-González Jorge, Lozoya-Santos Jorge de-J, Ramírez-Moreno Mauricio A
Mechatronics Department, School of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Av. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501 Sur, Monterrey 64849, Mexico.
Mechatronics Department, School of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Av. Gral Ramón Corona No 2514, Colonia Nuevo México, Zapopan 45201, Mexico.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 May;255:104949. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104949. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
Understanding the neural mechanisms underlying interest in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) and learning is crucial for fostering creativity and problem-solving skills, key drivers of technological and educational growth. Traditional methods of assessing STEM interest are often limited by cultural and human biases, highlighting the need for more objective approaches. This study utilizes Electroencephalography (EEG) to identify neural markers linked to STEM interest and course-specific cognitive demands in young learners enrolled in a specialized private STEM program, including courses such as 3D Design, Programming, and Robotics. Specifically, Power Spectral Density (PSD) and Functional Connectivity (FC) were analyzed within theta, alpha, and beta frequency bands, which are associated with performance monitoring, creativity, and executive functioning. The findings reveal a significant negative correlation between STEM interest and brain activity in the frontal (F3, F4) and prefrontal regions (FP1, FP2) in the theta (r = -0.44, p = 0.2732; r = -0.77, p = 0.0268; r = -0.84, p = 0.0096; r = -0.62, p = 0.0990) and beta bands (r = 0.43, p = 0.2843; r = -0.56, p = 0.1524; r = -0.83, p = 0.0110; r = -0.75, p = 0.0328), indicating engagement in working memory and executive processing. Additionally, course-specific brain activity patterns reveal that Robotics is characterized by denser long-range FC networks, associated with problem-solving, while 3D Design exhibits more sparse yet efficient networks, indicative of creative ideation. A consistent beta band FC pattern between central and left-frontal areas reflects cognitive synchronicity and lateralization. These findings contribute to understanding the neurocognitive markers involved in STEM interest and learning, offering a framework for assessing and fostering engagement in STEM education through objective, neuroscience-based approaches.
了解科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)兴趣及学习背后的神经机制,对于培养创造力和解决问题的能力至关重要,而创造力和解决问题的能力是技术和教育发展的关键驱动力。传统的评估STEM兴趣的方法往往受到文化和人为偏见的限制,这凸显了采用更客观方法的必要性。本研究利用脑电图(EEG)来识别与参加专门私立STEM项目的年轻学习者的STEM兴趣和特定课程认知需求相关的神经标志物,这些课程包括3D设计、编程和机器人技术等。具体而言,分析了与性能监测、创造力和执行功能相关的θ、α和β频段内的功率谱密度(PSD)和功能连接(FC)。研究结果显示,在θ频段(r = -0.44,p = 0.2732;r = -0.77,p = 0.0268;r = -0.84,p = 0.0096;r = -0.62,p = 0.0990)和β频段(r = 0.43,p = 0.2843;r = -0.56,p = 0.1524;r = -0.83,p = 0.0110;r = -0.75,p = 0.0328)中,STEM兴趣与额叶(F3、F4)和前额叶区域(FP1、FP2)的大脑活动之间存在显著负相关,表明参与了工作记忆和执行处理。此外,特定课程的大脑活动模式表明,机器人技术的特点是具有更密集的远程FC网络,与解决问题相关,而3D设计则表现出更稀疏但高效的网络,表明具有创造性思维。中央和左额叶区域之间一致的β频段FC模式反映了认知同步性和偏侧化。这些发现有助于理解参与STEM兴趣和学习的神经认知标志物,为通过基于神经科学的客观方法评估和促进STEM教育参与提供了一个框架。