• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用模糊多准则决策方法评估中国煤矿事故中的监管影响。

Evaluating regulatory influences on coal mine accidents in China using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach.

作者信息

Yin Yifan, Li Chengwu, Ye Qiusheng, Wei Chengmin, Li Mingjie

机构信息

School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), (No.11, Ding), College Road of Haidian District, Beijing, 100083, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 2;15(1):11204. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83116-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-83116-w
PMID:40169654
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11961561/
Abstract

Amidst the global surge in industrialization, frequent coal mine safety incidents pose significant risks to miners' lives and environmental stability. This study employs Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (FMCDM) to quantitatively analyze regulatory factors affecting coal mine safety in China from 2012 to 2022, identifying key elements that influence accident risks and regional policy disparities. By integrating Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), Fuzzy Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (FDEMATEL), and Gaussian Fuzzy Monte Carlo Analytic Network Process (GFMANP), a comprehensive risk assessment model is developed. This multifaceted approach addresses the limitations of traditional assessment methods, not only identifying the key regulatory factors impacting coal mine safety but also quantifying their influence and interrelationships. The findings reveal a strong correlation between design schemes and management systems (correlation coefficient 0.4931), emphasizing their interdependence and the importance of an integrated approach to safety management. In addition, the results show that technical documents and Southwest factors have the highest risk values (0.1506 and 0.2050, respectively), which provide a detailed risk assessment for different regions of China and are crucial for developing security strategies for different regions. Based on these findings, the recommendations include optimizing the synergy between design schemes and management systems, enhancing technical document management, and developing region-specific safety strategies to reduce the risks of coal mine accidents and improve safety management standards.

摘要

在全球工业化浪潮中,频繁发生的煤矿安全事故对矿工生命和环境稳定构成重大风险。本研究采用模糊多准则决策法(FMCDM)对2012年至2022年影响中国煤矿安全的监管因素进行定量分析,确定影响事故风险的关键因素和区域政策差异。通过整合结构方程模型(SEM)、模糊决策试验与评价实验室法(FDEMATEL)和高斯模糊蒙特卡洛分析网络过程法(GFMANP),开发了一个综合风险评估模型。这种多方面的方法克服了传统评估方法的局限性,不仅识别了影响煤矿安全的关键监管因素,还量化了它们的影响和相互关系。研究结果显示设计方案与管理系统之间存在很强的相关性(相关系数为0.4931),强调了它们的相互依存关系以及安全管理综合方法的重要性。此外,结果表明技术文件和西南地区因素的风险值最高(分别为0.1506和0.2050),这为中国不同地区提供了详细的风险评估,对制定不同地区的安全策略至关重要。基于这些发现,建议包括优化设计方案与管理系统之间的协同作用、加强技术文件管理以及制定针对不同地区的安全策略,以降低煤矿事故风险并提高安全管理标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/11961561/2f853399e579/41598_2024_83116_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/11961561/1a48ef581a8a/41598_2024_83116_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/11961561/6bc7675ef099/41598_2024_83116_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/11961561/83e4f6c5eeae/41598_2024_83116_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/11961561/db7e62ed8716/41598_2024_83116_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/11961561/dda237567d76/41598_2024_83116_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/11961561/425efe6a4803/41598_2024_83116_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/11961561/7c1e5ca56a8d/41598_2024_83116_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/11961561/c8639440d953/41598_2024_83116_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/11961561/2f853399e579/41598_2024_83116_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/11961561/1a48ef581a8a/41598_2024_83116_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/11961561/6bc7675ef099/41598_2024_83116_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/11961561/83e4f6c5eeae/41598_2024_83116_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/11961561/db7e62ed8716/41598_2024_83116_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/11961561/dda237567d76/41598_2024_83116_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/11961561/425efe6a4803/41598_2024_83116_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/11961561/7c1e5ca56a8d/41598_2024_83116_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/11961561/c8639440d953/41598_2024_83116_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3142/11961561/2f853399e579/41598_2024_83116_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating regulatory influences on coal mine accidents in China using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach.运用模糊多准则决策方法评估中国煤矿事故中的监管影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 2;15(1):11204. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83116-w.
2
Risk Assessment of Miners' Unsafe Behaviors: A Case Study of Gas Explosion Accidents in Coal Mine, China.矿工不安全行为风险评估:以中国煤矿瓦斯爆炸事故为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 18;16(10):1765. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101765.
3
Analysis of Factors Influencing Miners' Unsafe Behaviors in Intelligent Mines using a Novel Hybrid MCDM Model.基于一种新型混合 MCDM 模型的智能矿山中矿工不安全行为影响因素分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 16;19(12):7368. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127368.
4
Evaluating Targeted Intervention on Coal Miners' Unsafe Behavior.评估针对煤矿工人不安全行为的干预措施。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 1;16(3):422. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030422.
5
Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making framework for controlling methane explosions in coal mines.煤矿瓦斯爆炸控制的模糊多准则决策框架。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(6):9045-9061. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31782-0. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
6
Using the ISM-ANP-SD combination model to explore the mechanism and intervention strategies of influencing factors of coal mine safety system.运用ISM-ANP-SD 组合模型探究煤矿安全系统影响因素的作用机制及干预策略。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 23;10:1053298. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1053298. eCollection 2022.
7
Comprehensive Evaluation of Deep Coal Miners' Unsafe Behavior Based on HFACS-CM-SEM-SD.基于 HFACS-CM-SEM-SD 的深部煤矿工人不安全行为综合评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 29;19(17):10762. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710762.
8
Research on the Construction of a Comprehensive Evaluation Model of Psychological Factors in Coal Mine Workers' Safety: Investigation and Analysis of 1,500 Miners in East China.煤矿工人安全心理因素综合评价模型构建研究:对华东地区1500名矿工的调查与分析
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 3;10:849733. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.849733. eCollection 2022.
9
Research on coal mine safety management based on digital twin.基于数字孪生的煤矿安全管理研究
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 11;9(3):e13608. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13608. eCollection 2023 Mar.
10
Variance Analysis in China's Coal Mine Accident Studies Based on Data Mining.基于数据挖掘的中国煤矿事故研究中的方差分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 9;19(24):16582. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416582.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring Key Barriers of HACCP Certification Adoption in the Meat Industry: A Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory Approach.探索肉类行业采用HACCP认证的关键障碍:一种决策试验与评价实验室方法
Foods. 2024 Apr 24;13(9):1303. doi: 10.3390/foods13091303.
2
Correlational analysis of occupational accidents and the safety policies in the Chinese coal mining industry from 2008 to 2021.2008 年至 2021 年中国煤炭行业职业事故与安全政策的相关性分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 14;14(1):3748. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54241-3.
3
Comparative analytical study of the results of environmental risk assessment of urban landfills approach: bowtie, network analysis techniques (ANP), TOPSIS (case study: Gilan Province).
城市垃圾填埋场环境风险评估方法的对比分析研究:蝴蝶结法、网络分析技术(ANP)、逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)(案例研究:吉兰省)。
Environ Monit Assess. 2022 Oct 7;194(12):854. doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-10513-x.
4
Analysis 320 coal mine accidents using structural equation modeling with unsafe conditions of the rules and regulations as exogenous variables.运用结构方程模型分析 320 起煤矿事故,将规则和规章的不安全条件作为外生变量。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Jul;92:189-201. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.02.021. Epub 2016 Apr 14.