• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护士教育工作者在护理教育中使用生成式人工智能的感知担忧:一项范围综述的方案

The Perceived Concerns of Nurse Educators' Use of GenAI in Nursing Education: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

作者信息

Gehring Denise R, Titus Sharon K, George Ragi

机构信息

Health Sciences Librarian University Libraries, Azusa Pacific University Azusa California USA.

School of Nursing Azusa Pacific University Azusa California USA.

出版信息

Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 29;8(2):e70411. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70411. eCollection 2025 Feb.

DOI:10.1002/hsr2.70411
PMID:39897468
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11779745/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Since the emergence of generative AI (GenAI) in fall 2022, its impact on higher education has been significant yet under-researched, leading to mixed reactions among nurse educators, ranging from enthusiasm to skepticism. A preliminary search of seven databases found no scoping reviews specifically that addressed nurse educators' concerns about using GenAI. Therefore, this study aims to map the existing literature on nurse educators' concerns regarding the use of GenAI in nurse education.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Included are any types of sources (peer-reviewed and nonpeer-reviewed) in English and from any country and were authored by an academic nurse educator that reported on "academic nurse educators," and "artificial intelligence" (such as GenAI, Generative AI, ChatGPT, large language models) in nursing education. Articles that did not report "nurse educator concerns," or were focused on clinical practice were excluded.

METHODS

This protocol (see PRISMA-P in Appendix 1) establishes the study parameters for the planned scoping review, which will be conducted from April to July 2024. We will follow Joanna Briggs Institute, a comprehensive methodology, to ensure a rigorous approach. The final review will include relevant literature from eight academic databases published from Fall 2022 through April 2024. Data will be reported using the PRISMA-ScR checklist and flow diagram (2020) along with other visual diagrams to add validity to our findings. An inductive analysis approach will be used to code the evolving data, identify recurring themes, and pinpoint potential gaps in the literature.

RESULTS

The final scoping review will present the search results, the study inclusion process, and the data analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our planned review will potentially provide crucial insights into nurse educators' concerns on using GenAI, pinpointing gaps within the literature, and providing direction for future research.

REVIEW REGISTRATION

This protocol was registered on May 8, 2024, on Open Science Framework (OSF). The registry number is OSF.IO/SZ8WR. This registration ensures the transparency and credibility of our research process, as it provides a public record of our study design and methods.

摘要

背景/目的:自2022年秋季生成式人工智能(GenAI)出现以来,其对高等教育的影响重大,但研究不足,导致护士教育工作者反应不一,从热情到怀疑都有。对七个数据库的初步搜索未发现专门针对护士教育工作者对使用GenAI的担忧的范围综述。因此,本研究旨在梳理关于护士教育工作者对在护理教育中使用GenAI的担忧的现有文献。

纳入标准

纳入任何语言为英语、来自任何国家的任何类型的文献来源(经过同行评审和未经同行评审的),且由学术护士教育工作者撰写,报告了护理教育中的“学术护士教育工作者”和“人工智能”(如GenAI、生成式人工智能、ChatGPT、大语言模型)。未报告“护士教育工作者担忧”或专注于临床实践的文章被排除。

方法

本方案(见附录1中的PRISMA - P)确定了计划进行的范围综述的研究参数,该综述将于2024年4月至7月进行。我们将遵循乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的综合方法,以确保采用严谨的方法。最终综述将包括2022年秋季至2024年4月期间发表的来自八个学术数据库的相关文献。数据将使用PRISMA - ScR清单和流程图(2020)以及其他可视化图表进行报告,以增强我们研究结果的有效性。将采用归纳分析方法对不断演变的数据进行编码,识别反复出现的主题,并找出文献中的潜在差距。

结果

最终的范围综述将呈现搜索结果、研究纳入过程和数据分析。

结论

我们计划中的综述可能会为护士教育工作者对使用GenAI的担忧提供关键见解,找出文献中的差距,并为未来研究提供方向。

综述注册

本方案于2024年5月8日在开放科学框架(OSF)上注册。注册号为OSF.IO/SZ8WR。此注册确保了我们研究过程的透明度和可信度,因为它提供了我们研究设计和方法的公开记录。

相似文献

1
The Perceived Concerns of Nurse Educators' Use of GenAI in Nursing Education: Protocol for a Scoping Review.护士教育工作者在护理教育中使用生成式人工智能的感知担忧:一项范围综述的方案
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 29;8(2):e70411. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70411. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
4
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
5
Decoding medical educators' perceptions on generative artificial intelligence in medical education.解码医学教育者对医学教育中生成式人工智能的看法。
J Investig Med. 2024 Oct;72(7):633-639. doi: 10.1177/10815589241257215. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
6
Artificial intelligence technologies and compassion in healthcare: A systematic scoping review.医疗保健中的人工智能技术与人文关怀:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 17;13:971044. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971044. eCollection 2022.
7
Instruments assessing nurse educator's competence: A scoping review.评估护士教育者能力的工具:范围综述。
Nurs Open. 2023 Apr;10(4):1985-2002. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1479. Epub 2022 Nov 20.
8
Health Care Social Robots in the Age of Generative AI: Protocol for a Scoping Review.生成式人工智能时代的医疗保健社交机器人:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Apr 14;14:e63017. doi: 10.2196/63017.
9
Legal concerns in health-related artificial intelligence: a scoping review protocol.健康相关人工智能的法律问题:范围综述方案
Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 17;11(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01939-y.
10
Exploring Curriculum Considerations to Prepare Future Radiographers for an AI-Assisted Health Care Environment: Protocol for Scoping Review.探索课程考量,为未来放射技师适应人工智能辅助医疗环境做好准备:范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Mar 6;14:e60431. doi: 10.2196/60431.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the BENEFITS-CCCSAT based on CTT and IRT: a cross-sectional design translation and validation study.基于经典测验理论和项目反应理论对中文版BENEFITS-CCCSAT进行心理测量学评估:一项横断面设计的翻译与验证研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 18;13:1532709. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1532709. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Tool or Tyrant: Guiding and Guarding Generative Artificial Intelligence Use in Nursing Education.工具还是暴君:引导和守护生成式人工智能在护理教育中的应用。
Creat Nurs. 2024 May;30(2):125-132. doi: 10.1177/10784535241247094. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
2
Made Better by Chat GPT: Cultivating a Culture of Innovation in Nursing Education: Cultivating a Culture of Innovation in Nursing Education.由Chat GPT助力提升:在护理教育中培育创新文化:在护理教育中培育创新文化。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2024;45(2):67-68. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001242.
3
Comparison of the Performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 With That of Medical Students on the Written German Medical Licensing Examination: Observational Study.GPT-3.5 和 GPT-4 与医学生在书面德语文凭考试中的表现比较:观察性研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Feb 8;10:e50965. doi: 10.2196/50965.
4
Nursing education in the age of artificial intelligence powered Chatbots (AI-Chatbots): Are we ready yet?人工智能驱动的聊天机器人(AI-Chatbots)时代的护理教育:我们准备好了吗?
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Oct;129:105917. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105917. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
5
ChatGPT and Forms of Deception.ChatGPT 与欺骗形式。
Nurs Sci Q. 2023 Jul;36(3):232-233. doi: 10.1177/08943184231169753.
6
Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews.综述的提取、分析和结果呈现建议。
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Mar 1;21(3):520-532. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00123.
7
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
8
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
9
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.系统评价和荟萃分析议定书的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015:详细说明和解释。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
10
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.