• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

航空创伤后应激障碍评估政策及其以湍流引发创伤为例的实际应用

Assessment policy of post-traumatic stress disorder in aviation and its practical application using turbulence-triggered trauma as an example.

作者信息

Vuorio Alpo, Bor Robert, Budowle Bruce, Gray Alastair, Suhonen-Malm Anna-Stina

机构信息

Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Mehiläinen Airport Health Centre, Vantaa, Finland.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 18;13:1505004. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1505004. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1505004
PMID:40171433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11959024/
Abstract

The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recently provided detailed instructions on how Aviation Medical Examiners (AMEs) should assess and evaluate pilots for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The European, Australian and International Civil Aviation Organization guidelines for the assessment of PTSD in aviation are general guidelines and do not address the unique and specific circumstances of a flight crew . The starting point of the U.S. FAA's guidance is an already-established clinical PTSD diagnosis since it is known that PTSD compromises aviation safety and has been related to fatal aviation accidents. According to the FAA's guidance, a PTSD assessment is undertaken based on whether the condition is symptomatic and medicated, or whether more than 2 years have elapsed since showing symptoms and receiving medication. The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) criteria for stress disorders have changed between versions ICD-10 and the soon-to-be-released ICD-11. The new ICD-11 criteria are discussed in this article in the context of aviation health. Additionally, PTSD, potentially caused by an incident of turbulence, is discussed in the context of aviation mental health. There are currently no published studies on turbulence-caused mental trauma. We have identified in this article potential factors which are related to pilots' and cabin crew's stressors in incidents of severe and extreme turbulence. Three recommendations are provided: (1) harmonize assessment practices of PTSD internationally; (2) healthcare professionals taking care of traumatized flight crew should have a follow-up guide that takes specific and local conditions into account, and ensures the identification of patients who require follow-up treatment as early as possible; and (3) aviation health care professionals should consider ICD-11 diagnostic criteria as the information may be more useful in the assessment and diagnosis of aviation-related trauma.

摘要

美国联邦航空管理局(FAA)近期就航空体检医师(AME)应如何评估飞行员的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)提供了详细指导。欧洲、澳大利亚及国际民航组织关于航空领域PTSD评估的指南均为一般性指南,未涉及飞行机组人员的独特具体情况。美国联邦航空管理局指导意见的出发点是已确立的临床PTSD诊断,因为众所周知PTSD会危及航空安全且与致命航空事故有关。根据联邦航空管理局的指导意见,PTSD评估基于该病症是否有症状且正在接受药物治疗,或者自出现症状并接受药物治疗以来是否已过去两年以上。国际疾病分类(ICD)中关于应激障碍的标准在ICD - 10版本与即将发布的ICD - 11版本之间有所变化。本文在航空健康背景下讨论了新的ICD - 11标准。此外,还在航空心理健康背景下讨论了可能由颠簸事件引发的PTSD。目前尚无关于颠簸导致精神创伤的已发表研究。我们在本文中确定了与严重和极端颠簸事件中飞行员及客舱机组人员压力源相关的潜在因素。并提出了三项建议:(1)在国际上统一PTSD评估做法;(2)照顾受过创伤的飞行机组人员的医疗保健专业人员应拥有一份考虑到具体和当地情况的后续指导,并确保尽早识别出需要后续治疗的患者;(3)航空医疗保健专业人员应考虑ICD - 11诊断标准,因为该信息在评估和诊断与航空相关的创伤时可能更有用。

相似文献

1
Assessment policy of post-traumatic stress disorder in aviation and its practical application using turbulence-triggered trauma as an example.航空创伤后应激障碍评估政策及其以湍流引发创伤为例的实际应用
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 18;13:1505004. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1505004. eCollection 2025.
2
Pilot Medical Certification飞行员医学认证
3
Glaucoma in U.S. Civil Aviation: 2005-2014.美国民航业中的青光眼:2005 - 2014年
Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2017 Dec 1;88(12):1117-1122. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.4704.2017.
4
23 years of toxicology testing fatally injured pilots: Implications for aviation and other modes of transportation.23年毒理学测试对飞行员造成致命伤害:对航空及其他运输方式的启示
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 May;90:108-17. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
5
You're the Flight Surgeon.
Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2019 May 1;90(5):496-500. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.5331.2019.
6
Medical histories of 61 aviation accident pilots with postmortem SSRI antidepressant residues.61名有尸检SSRI抗抑郁药残留的航空事故飞行员的病史。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007 Nov;78(11):1055-9. doi: 10.3357/asem.2030.2007.
7
Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Assessment and Aviation Safety Using Major Depression as a Reference.
Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024 Nov;95(11):873-875. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.6537.2024.
8
Psychiatry and Fitness to Fly After Germanwings.德国之翼航空事件后关于精神医学与飞行适任的探讨
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2020 Mar;48(1):65-76. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.003889-20. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
9
Letter to the Editor: CONVERGENCES AND DIVERGENCES IN THE ICD-11 VS. DSM-5 CLASSIFICATION OF MOOD DISORDERS.给编辑的信:《ICD-11 与 DSM-5 心境障碍分类的趋同与分歧》
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021;32(4):293-295. doi: 10.5080/u26899.
10
Prevalence and predictive value of ICD-11 post-traumatic stress disorder and Complex PTSD diagnoses in children and adolescents exposed to a single-event trauma.儿童和青少年单次创伤后 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍诊断的患病率和预测价值。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 Mar;62(3):270-276. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13240. Epub 2020 Apr 28.

本文引用的文献

1
The Management of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Acute Stress Disorder: Synopsis of the 2023 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guideline.创伤后应激障碍和急性应激障碍的管理:2023年美国退伍军人事务部和美国国防部临床实践指南概要
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Mar;177(3):363-374. doi: 10.7326/M23-2757. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
2
What Are the Predictors of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Among Road Traffic Accident Survivors: A Systematic Review.道路交通事故幸存者创伤后应激障碍的预测因素:系统评价。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2024 Feb 1;212(2):104-116. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001739.
3
Stress-associated symptoms and disorders: A transdiagnostic comparison.应激相关症状与障碍:一项跨诊断比较。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2023 Sep-Oct;30(5):1047-1057. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2858. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
4
Prolonged grief disorder in ICD-11 and -5-TR: Challenges and controversies.《ICD-11 与 -5-TR 中的延长哀伤障碍:挑战与争议》
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2023 Jul;57(7):944-951. doi: 10.1177/00048674231154206. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
5
Deconstructing dissociation: a triple network model of trauma-related dissociation and its subtypes.解构解离:创伤相关解离及其亚型的三重网络模型。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Dec;47(13):2261-2270. doi: 10.1038/s41386-022-01468-1. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
6
[Diagnostic Criteria of PTSD in ICD10, ICD-11 and DSM 5: Relevance for expert opinion].[《国际疾病分类第10版》《国际疾病分类第11版》和《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版》中创伤后应激障碍的诊断标准:与专家意见的相关性]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2022 Jun;72(6):258-271. doi: 10.1055/a-1770-3972. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
7
Change in prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder in the two years following trauma: a meta-analytic study.创伤后两年创伤后应激障碍患病率的变化:一项荟萃分析研究。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 May 23;13(1):2066456. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2066456. eCollection 2022.
8
Validation of the International Trauma Interview (ITI) for the Clinical Assessment of ICD-11 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Complex PTSD (CPTSD) in a Lithuanian Sample.验证国际创伤访谈(ITI)在立陶宛样本中用于 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)的临床评估。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Feb 23;13(1):2037905. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2037905. eCollection 2022.
9
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5) based on DSM-5 vs. ICD-11 criteria.基于 DSM-5 与 ICD-11 标准的创伤后应激障碍量表(CAPS-5)的验证性因子分析。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Jan 19;13(1):2010995. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.2010995. eCollection 2022.
10
Neural contributors to trauma resilience: a review of longitudinal neuroimaging studies.创伤后适应能力的神经学贡献因素:一项纵向神经影像学研究综述。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 5;11(1):508. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01633-y.