Komolsuradej Narucha, Srikrajang Siwaluk, Ratanapisit Chalat, Silajan Sirisak, Hosakul Jirapat, Thanapanphanich Sirikarn, Samangsri Laksika, Keawnop Weerawut, Pleamjai Umaporn, Loychusak Suphichaya
Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Kanchanavanich road 15, Hatyai, 90110, Songkhla, Thailand.
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Kanchanavanich road 15, Hatyai, 90110, Songkhla, Thailand.
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 2;15(1):11315. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95665-9.
With increasing life expectancy and an aging population, societies worldwide are experiencing a growing workforce affected by chronic musculoskeletal pain (MSP). However, the impact of pain management on work ability in this demographic remains uninvestigated. This cross-sectional study aimed to examine the association between pain-management strategies and work ability among aging workers with MSP. Data were collected from 264 aging workers (≥ 45 years of age) experiencing chronic MSP for at least three months. Participants completed face-to-face interviews using the Thai versions of the Brief Pain Inventory, Pain Coping Inventory, and Work Ability Index (WAI) questionnaires. Information on job characteristics and health status was recorded. Pain-management approaches were categorized into pharmacological treatments, non-pharmacological treatments, and self-pain-coping strategies. The results revealed that pharmacological (69.3%), non-pharmacological (60.3%), and self-pain-coping (90.9%) strategies were commonly used for pain relief. Pain-management strategies significantly associated with work ability included pharmacological treatment (p = 0.011), combined pharmacological, and non-pharmacological treatments (p = 0.013), continuing activities at a slower pace (p = 0.011), retreating to a restful environment (p = 0.018), and continuous focus on the pain (p = 0.025). Ordinal logistic regression analysis identified returning home immediately when outdoors as significant risk factors for poor work ability. In conclusion, this study highlights the significant role of pain management in maintaining work ability among aging workers. Pharmacological and combined treatments were commonly used, but coping strategies such as returning home immediately were linked to reduced work ability. Pain severity, interference, and chronic conditions (hypertension, dyslipidemia, knee pain, and low back pain) were key risk factors for decreased work ability.
随着预期寿命的延长和人口老龄化,全球社会正面临着越来越多受慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛(MSP)影响的劳动力。然而,疼痛管理对这一人群工作能力的影响仍未得到研究。这项横断面研究旨在探讨疼痛管理策略与患有MSP的老年工人工作能力之间的关联。数据收集自264名年龄在45岁及以上、患有慢性MSP至少三个月的老年工人。参与者使用泰语版的简明疼痛量表、疼痛应对量表和工作能力指数(WAI)问卷完成了面对面访谈。记录了工作特征和健康状况的信息。疼痛管理方法分为药物治疗、非药物治疗和自我疼痛应对策略。结果显示,药物治疗(69.3%)、非药物治疗(60.3%)和自我疼痛应对(90.9%)策略常用于缓解疼痛。与工作能力显著相关的疼痛管理策略包括药物治疗(p = 0.011)、药物和非药物联合治疗(p = 0.013)、以较慢的速度继续活动(p = 0.011)、退回到安静的环境(p = 0.018)以及持续关注疼痛(p = 0.025)。有序逻辑回归分析确定,在户外时立即回家是工作能力差的显著风险因素。总之,本研究强调了疼痛管理在维持老年工人工作能力方面的重要作用。药物治疗和联合治疗是常用的,但像立即回家这样的应对策略与工作能力下降有关。疼痛严重程度、干扰以及慢性疾病(高血压、血脂异常、膝关节疼痛和腰痛)是工作能力下降的关键风险因素。