Ma Hao, Lei Lei, Liu Aonan, Yang Yanfang
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, No.17 Section 3, Renmin South Road, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 758 Hefei Road, Qingdao, Shandong, 266035, China.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 3;25(1):1251. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22389-w.
The global COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted public health and socio-economic development worldwide. This study aims to investigate the effects of non-healthcare system interventions on the daily new cases of COVID-19 from January 2020 to October 2022.
With the aid of multilevel approach, we identified income group, region and country as stratification factors that affect the number of COVID-19 daily new cases. Data on COVID-19 cases collected by Johns Hopkins University were used, and policy implementation details were recorded through the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker dataset. To analyze the effects of national, regional, and income group factors on the number of daily new COVID-19 cases, we implemented three multilevel sequential mixed-effects models and applied restricted maximum likelihood to estimate the variance of random effects.
Our results indicate a correlation between income group and the rise in intercepts of random effects in the multilevel sequential mixed-effects models. High-income countries recorded the highest intercept at 713.26, while low-income countries showed the lowest at -313.79. Under the influence of policies, the implementation of "Canceling public events" and "International travel restrictions" has been shown to significantly reduce the daily number of new COVID-19 cases. In contrast, "Restrictions on gatherings" appear to have the opposite effect, potentially leading to an increase in daily new COVID-19 cases.
In designing epidemic control policies, due consideration should be given to factors such as income group, as well as medical, demographic, and social differences among nations influenced by economic factors. In policy-making, policymakers should pay greater attention to policy implementation and people's responses, in order to maximize the effectiveness and adherence of such policies.
全球新冠疫情对全球公共卫生和社会经济发展产生了重大影响。本研究旨在调查2020年1月至2022年10月非医疗系统干预措施对新冠每日新增病例的影响。
借助多层次方法,我们将收入群体、地区和国家确定为影响新冠每日新增病例数的分层因素。使用了约翰·霍普金斯大学收集的新冠病例数据,并通过牛津新冠疫情政府应对追踪数据集记录政策实施细节。为了分析国家、地区和收入群体因素对新冠每日新增病例数的影响,我们实施了三个多层次顺序混合效应模型,并应用限制最大似然法估计随机效应的方差。
我们的结果表明,收入群体与多层次顺序混合效应模型中随机效应截距的上升之间存在相关性。高收入国家的截距最高,为713.26,而低收入国家的截距最低,为-313.79。在政策影响下,“取消公共活动”和“国际旅行限制”的实施已被证明能显著减少新冠每日新增病例数。相比之下,“集会限制”似乎产生了相反的效果,可能导致新冠每日新增病例数增加。
在设计疫情防控政策时,应充分考虑收入群体等因素,以及受经济因素影响的国家间的医疗、人口和社会差异。在决策过程中,政策制定者应更加关注政策实施情况和民众反应,以最大限度地提高此类政策的有效性和依从性。