Jenkins Timothy O, Karbing Dan Stieper, Rees Stephen Edward, Poulsen Mathias Krogh, Patel Brijesh V, Polkey Michael I, MacBean Vicky
Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, London, UK.
Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg Universitet, Aalborg, Denmark.
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2025 Apr 5;12(1):e002878. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002878.
Physical rehabilitation is advocated to improve muscle strength and function after critical illness, yet interventional studies have reported inconsistent benefits. A greater insight into patients' physiological response to exercise may provide an option to prescribe individualised, targeted rehabilitation, yet there is limited data measuring oxygen consumption (VO) during physical rehabilitation. We aimed to test the feasibility of measuring VO during seated and standing exercise using the Beacon Caresystem and quantify within- and between-patient variability of VO percentage change.
We conducted a prospective observational study on patients mechanically ventilated for ≥72 hours and able to participate in physical rehabilitation in critical care. Oxygen consumption was measured continuously using indirect calorimetry. A total of 29 measurements were taken from ten participants performing active sitting and standing exercise.
Median (IQR) first session baseline VO was 3.54 (2.9-3.9) mL/kg/min, increasing significantly to 4.37 (3.96-5.14) mL/kg/min during exercise (p=0.005). The median (IQR) coefficient of variation of VO percentage change in participants (n=7) who completed more than one rehabilitation session (range 2-7 sessions) was 43 (34-61)% in 26 measurements. The median (IQR) coefficient of variation of VO percentage change was 46 (26-63)% in participants performing >1 sitting exercise session (six participants, 19 sessions).
VO increases significantly with exercise but is highly variable between participants, and in the same participant on separate occasions, performing the same functional activity. These data suggest that simplified measures of function do not necessarily relate to oxygen consumption.
NCT05101850.
提倡进行物理康复以改善危重症后的肌肉力量和功能,但干预性研究报告的益处并不一致。更深入了解患者对运动的生理反应可能为制定个性化、有针对性的康复方案提供选择,然而在物理康复期间测量耗氧量(VO)的数据有限。我们旨在测试使用Beacon Care系统测量坐位和站立运动期间VO的可行性,并量化患者内和患者间VO百分比变化的变异性。
我们对机械通气≥72小时且能够参与重症监护物理康复的患者进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。使用间接量热法连续测量耗氧量。对10名进行主动坐位和站立运动的参与者共进行了29次测量。
第一次训练的基线VO中位数(IQR)为3.54(2.9 - 3.9)mL/kg/min,运动期间显著增加至4.37(3.96 - 5.14)mL/kg/min(p = 0.005)。在完成超过一次康复训练(范围2 - 7次训练)的参与者(n = 7)中,26次测量的VO百分比变化的变异系数中位数(IQR)为43(34 - 61)%。在进行>1次坐位训练的参与者(6名参与者,19次训练)中,VO百分比变化的变异系数中位数(IQR)为46(