• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卢干达爱丁堡产后抑郁量表:乌干达样本中用于产前抑郁筛查的跨文化调适与验证

The Luganda Edinburgh Postnatal depression scale: cross-cultural adaptation and validation for prenatal screening of depression in a Ugandan sample.

作者信息

Mukasa David Christopher, Ononge Sam, Namagembe Imelda, Byamugisha Josaphat, Sekikubo Musa, Muyingo Mark, Nakasujja Noeline

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

University hospital, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

出版信息

Afr Health Sci. 2024 Dec;24(4):214-223. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v24i4.28.

DOI:10.4314/ahs.v24i4.28
PMID:40190508
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11970186/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Depression affects approximately 364 million people globally. Prenatal depression affects between 26.3% and 32.9% of mothers in Africa. Opportunities for prenatal screening are missed. The gold standard diagnostic, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth edition (DSM-5) criteria for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) has higher technical requirement. There is inadequate information on locally adapted and validated user-friendly screening tools in Uganda.

OBJECTIVE

To Adapt and validate the Luganda Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS-L) for screening prenatal depression at Kawempe National Referral hospital (KNRH).

METHODS

Cross-sectional study in KNRH using International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research guidelines for adaptation and quantitative approaches for the validation. Consecutive sampling until the desired sample of 100, all participants responded to both EPDS-L and DSM-5 criteria for MDD. Reliability demonstrated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, while validity was demonstrated by sensitivity, specificity, Negative Predictive Value (NPV), Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Area-Under-the-curve (AUC).

RESULTS

EPDS-L had Cronbach's-Alpha of 0.8515. At cut-off of 13, sensitivity was 62.86%, specificity-100%, PPV-100% and NPV-83.3%. AUC was 0.99. Performance was better at cut-off of 10, with sensitivity-97.14% and specificity-98.46%.

CONCLUSION

The EPDS-L is reliable at cut-off of 13 but performs even better at cut-off of 10.

摘要

背景

抑郁症在全球约影响3.64亿人。产前抑郁症在非洲影响26.3%至32.9%的母亲。产前筛查机会被错过。黄金标准诊断,即《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)中重度抑郁症(MDD)的标准技术要求较高。在乌干达,关于本地适用且经过验证的用户友好型筛查工具的信息不足。

目的

在卡韦姆佩国家转诊医院(KNRH)对卢干达版爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS-L)进行改编和验证,以筛查产前抑郁症。

方法

在KNRH进行横断面研究,采用国际药物经济学与结果研究学会的改编指南和验证的定量方法。连续抽样直至达到100的目标样本,所有参与者均对EPDS-L和MDD的DSM-5标准做出回应。使用克朗巴哈α系数证明信度,通过敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值(NPV)、阳性预测值(PPV)和曲线下面积(AUC)证明效度。

结果

EPDS-L的克朗巴哈α系数为0.8515。截断值为13时,敏感性为62.86%,特异性为100%,PPV为100%,NPV为83.3%。AUC为0.99。截断值为10时表现更好,敏感性为97.14%,特异性为98.46%。

结论

EPDS-L在截断值为13时可靠,但在截断值为10时表现更佳。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb2d/11970186/e5386203b0d6/AFHS2404-0214Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb2d/11970186/e5386203b0d6/AFHS2404-0214Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb2d/11970186/e5386203b0d6/AFHS2404-0214Fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
The Luganda Edinburgh Postnatal depression scale: cross-cultural adaptation and validation for prenatal screening of depression in a Ugandan sample.卢干达爱丁堡产后抑郁量表:乌干达样本中用于产前抑郁筛查的跨文化调适与验证
Afr Health Sci. 2024 Dec;24(4):214-223. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v24i4.28.
2
Validation of screening tools for antenatal depression in Malawi--a comparison of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Self Reporting Questionnaire.马拉维产前抑郁症筛查工具的验证——爱丁堡产后抑郁量表和自我报告问卷的比较。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Sep 25;150(3):1041-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.05.036. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
3
Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and its 3-item anxiety subscale, and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 item for screening of postpartum depression and anxiety in women in Malta.爱丁堡产后抑郁量表及其3项焦虑子量表和广泛性焦虑障碍7项量表在马耳他女性产后抑郁和焦虑筛查中的效度验证。
Midwifery. 2025 Feb;141:104256. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.104256. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
4
The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: translation and antepartum validation for a Hungarian sample.爱丁堡产后抑郁量表:匈牙利样本的翻译和产前验证。
Midwifery. 2013 Apr;29(4):308-15. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.01.011. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
5
Validation of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale as a screening tool for depression in Spanish pregnant women.验证爱丁堡产后抑郁量表作为西班牙孕妇抑郁筛查工具的有效性。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Mar 1;246:515-521. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.075. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
6
Optimal cut-off score of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for major depressive episode during pregnancy in Japan.日本妊娠期重度抑郁症的爱丁堡产后抑郁量表最佳截断值。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017 Dec;71(12):836-842. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12562. Epub 2017 Sep 10.
7
Reliability and validity of the center for epidemiologic studies-depression scale in screening for depression among HIV-infected and -uninfected pregnant women attending antenatal services in northern Uganda: a cross-sectional study.乌干达北部接受产前检查的感染与未感染艾滋病毒孕妇中,流行病学研究中心抑郁量表在抑郁症筛查中的信度和效度:一项横断面研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Nov 22;14:303. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0303-y.
8
Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale against both DSM-5 and ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for depression.验证爱丁堡产后抑郁量表对 DSM-5 和 ICD-10 抑郁诊断标准的适用性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 20;18(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1965-7.
9
Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for screening for depression in the first year post delivery in a low-resourced rural setting in Kenya.爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)用于在肯尼亚资源匮乏的农村地区产后第一年筛查抑郁。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;60(3):476-483. doi: 10.1177/13634615211043764. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
10
Re-evaluation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale as screening for post-partum depression in Iwate Prefecture, Japan.对爱丁堡产后抑郁量表在日本岩手县作为产后抑郁症筛查工具的重新评估。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Sep;45(9):1876-1883. doi: 10.1111/jog.14042. Epub 2019 Jun 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Validating the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale Against the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition for Use in Uganda.对照《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版验证爱丁堡产后抑郁量表在乌干达的适用性。
Int J Womens Health. 2023 Nov 21;15:1821-1832. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S427752. eCollection 2023.
2
A novel method for the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life patient-reported outcome measurements.一种用于健康相关生活质量患者报告结局测量的跨文化适应性和翻译的新方法。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Jan 31;21(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02089-y.
3
Level of and factors associated with awareness of gestational diabetes mellitus among pregnant women attending antenatal care at Kawempe National Referral Hospital: a cross sectional study.
卡文佩国家转诊医院产前保健孕妇对妊娠期糖尿病知晓率及其影响因素的横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jun 30;21(1):467. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03927-x.
4
A Cross-Cultural Analysis of the Prevalence and Risk Factors for Prenatal Depression in Spain and Mexico.西班牙和墨西哥产前抑郁症患病率及危险因素的跨文化分析
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;45(4):599-612. doi: 10.1007/s11013-020-09691-5. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
5
Epidemiology of antenatal depression in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非洲产前抑郁症的流行病学:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Apr 28;20(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02929-5.
6
A cross-sectional study of the prevalence and factors associated with symptoms of perinatal depression and anxiety in Rwanda.卢旺达围生期抑郁和焦虑症状的流行情况及相关因素的横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2747-z.
7
Validation of hindi version of Edinburgh postnatal depression scale as a screening tool for antenatal depression.爱丁堡产后抑郁量表印地语版作为产前抑郁筛查工具的效度验证。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Feb;48:101919. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2019.101919. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
8
Implementation of universal screening for depression during pregnancy: feasibility and impact on obstetric care.孕期抑郁症普遍筛查的实施:可行性及对产科护理的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;215(4):517.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.05.024. Epub 2016 May 20.
9
Adaptation and cross-cultural validation of the United States Primary Care Assessment Tool (expanded version) for use in South Africa.美国初级保健评估工具(扩展版)在南非使用的适应性调整与跨文化验证
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2015 Jun 19;7(1):e1-e11. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v7i1.783.
10
A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus.对问卷跨文化调适指南的回顾未能达成共识。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;68(4):435-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.021. Epub 2014 Dec 17.