Zhang Haiqi, Chow Shein-Chung
Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, 2424 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Apr 7. doi: 10.1007/s43441-025-00772-4.
In psychiatry clinical trials, a validated instrument (or questionnaire) which consists of a number of questions (or items) is often used for evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a test treatment under investigation. This approach based on rating scales for evaluation of safety and efficacy of a test treatment under study, however, has been criticized of being subjective. To overcome the problem, the use of a composite index which combines the subjective rating scales and objective functional magnetic resonance imaging is proposed. For this purpose, statistical methods for development of composite index are derived. The proposed composite index is evaluated both theoretically and via extensive clinical simulation studies.
在精神病学临床试验中,一种由多个问题(或条目)组成的经过验证的工具(或问卷)常被用于评估正在研究的试验治疗的安全性和有效性。然而,这种基于评分量表来评估所研究的试验治疗的安全性和有效性的方法,一直被批评为主观。为克服这一问题,有人提出使用一种结合主观评分量表和客观功能磁共振成像的综合指标。为此,推导了用于开发综合指标的统计方法。所提出的综合指标在理论上以及通过广泛的临床模拟研究进行了评估。