Nuampa Sasitara, Ratinthorn Ameporn, Tangsuksan Pornnapa, Chalermpichai Thiwarphorn, Kuesakul Kornkanok, Ruchob Rungnapa, Chanphong Janya, Buranasak Jitrapee, Khadking Naiyana, Subsomboon Kultida, Pangzup Saowaros, Sirithepmontree Sudhathai, Hungsawanus Puttiraporn
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
BMC Nurs. 2025 Apr 7;24(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03016-w.
Critical thinking constitutes a multifaceted and dynamic process to make appropriate decisions and solve problems. In simulation-based learning, critical thinking can be influenced by personal factors, facilitators, and design.
This study was conducted to investigate the experiences and factors associated with critical thinking in simulation-based maternal-child nursing education.
This study utilized an explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach. In the quantitative phase, convenience sampling was employed to select 400 undergraduate nursing students who met the following inclusion criteria: no history of repeating the maternal-child nursing and midwifery practicum course and class attendance of at least 80% of the total instructional hours. Following the completion of quantitative data collection, purposive sampling was used to recruit 80 students who had participated in and completed the initial survey to participate in focus group discussions.
Half of the nursing students had moderate scores of critical thinking on maternal-child nursing simulation. The regression analysis revealed that perception of professional identity, a personal factor, was statistically significantly associated with a high level of critical thinking (Beta = 0.207, t = 4.607, p = 0.000). Additionally, the attitude toward simulation (Beta = 0.139, t = 2.731, p = 0.007) and perceived stress (Beta = -0.103, t = -2.269, p = 0.024) were statistically significantly associated with critical thinking level. In the simulation design, the support aspect toward simulation design (Beta = 0.265, t = 2.943, p = 0.003) and the problem-solving aspect toward simulation importance (Beta = 0.239, t = 2.288, p = 0.023) were statistically significantly associated with a high level of critical thinking. The multiple linear regression model accounted for 35% of the variance in critical thinking with maternal-child nursing simulated learning. Qualitative data revealed the following themes: (1) a well-planned approach enables me to optimize my learning; (2) allow me to make mistakes, but please don't leave me with failure; and (3) emulating practice shapes my growth as a nursing professional.
The personal factor and simulation design factors were important for increasing critical thinking level. Promoting effective learning strategies, such as the use of simulated experiences, is useful in enhancing midwifery and nursing students' competencies.
批判性思维是一个多方面的动态过程,用于做出恰当决策和解决问题。在基于模拟的学习中,批判性思维会受到个人因素、促进者和设计的影响。
本研究旨在调查基于模拟的母婴护理教育中与批判性思维相关的经历和因素。
本研究采用解释性序列混合方法。在定量阶段,采用便利抽样法选取400名本科护理专业学生,他们需符合以下纳入标准:无母婴护理和助产实习课程重修记录,且课堂出勤率至少达到总教学时长的80%。在完成定量数据收集后,采用目的抽样法招募了80名参与并完成初始调查的学生参加焦点小组讨论。
一半的护理专业学生在母婴护理模拟中的批判性思维得分中等。回归分析显示,个人因素职业认同感与高水平的批判性思维在统计学上显著相关(β = 0.207,t = 4.607,p = 0.000)。此外,对模拟的态度(β = 0.139,t = 2.731,p = 0.007)和感知压力(β = -0.103,t = -2.269,p = 0.024)与批判性思维水平在统计学上显著相关。在模拟设计方面,对模拟设计的支持方面(β = 0.265,t = 2.943,p = 0.003)和对模拟重要性的问题解决方面(β = 0.239,t = 2.288,p = 0.023)与高水平的批判性思维在统计学上显著相关。多元线性回归模型解释了母婴护理模拟学习中批判性思维35%的方差。定性数据揭示了以下主题:(1)精心规划的方法使我能够优化学习;(2)允许我犯错,但请不要让我以失败告终;(3)模拟实践塑造了我作为护理专业人员的成长。
个人因素和模拟设计因素对提高批判性思维水平很重要。推广有效的学习策略,如使用模拟体验,有助于提高助产和护理专业学生的能力。