Olmos Manuel, Backhaus Joy, Lutz Rainer, Nobis Christopher-Phillip, Koenig Sarah, Kesting Marco, Weber Manuel
Department of Oral and Cranio- Maxillofacial Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Apr 8;29(5):228. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06314-4.
Although existing microsurgical models provide a high degree of realism in tissue properties, they often neglect the complex and constrained spatial-anatomical conditions typical of head and neck surgery. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Head and Neck Realistic Anatomical Condition Experience (RACE) model in enhancing microsurgical education.
Using a microsurgical competency assessment tool and self-assessment questionnaires, the head and neck RACE model was evaluated through application in two student courses (10 participants) and one resident course (5 participants). In both groups, first the conventional chicken thigh model and then the RACE model were applied. Data were analyzed using a two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Welch's statistics to assess differences between the groups.
In pregraduate courses, the transition from the conventional chicken thigh model to the RACE model initially led to a decline across all eight microsurgical performance parameters (Q1.1-Q4.2). However, after an additional day of training with the RACE model, all parameters-except tissue-preserving technique (Q1.2) - returned to or significantly exceeded baseline levels (Q1.2 p = 0.373, Q1.3 p = 0.003, Q2.1 p < 0.001, Q2.2 p = 0.022, Q2.3 p = 0.008, Q3.1 = 0.014, Q4.1 p = 0.036, Q4.2 p = 0.002). Conversely, residents showed immediate improvement in all parameters, except for suture distance to the vessel's margin, upon switching to the RACE model.
Head and neck RACE models provide a challenging and practical addition to microsurgery teaching.
The positive impact on learning outcomes in this area supports the development of RACE models in other areas of microsurgical and general medical training, and therefore the education of students and clinical practitioners.
尽管现有的显微外科模型在组织特性方面具有高度的逼真性,但它们往往忽略了头颈外科典型的复杂且受限的空间解剖条件。本研究旨在评估头颈逼真解剖条件体验(RACE)模型在加强显微外科教育方面的有效性。
使用显微外科技能评估工具和自我评估问卷,通过在两个学生课程(10名参与者)和一个住院医师课程(5名参与者)中的应用对头颈RACE模型进行评估。在两组中,首先应用传统的鸡大腿模型,然后应用RACE模型。使用带有韦尔奇统计量的双向重复测量方差分析对数据进行分析,以评估组间差异。
在研究生课程中,从传统鸡大腿模型过渡到RACE模型最初导致所有八个显微外科操作参数(Q1.1-Q4.2)下降。然而,在使用RACE模型额外训练一天后,除了组织保留技术(Q1.2)外,所有参数都恢复到或显著超过基线水平(Q1.2 p = 0.373,Q1.3 p = 0.003,Q2.1 p < 0.001,Q2.2 p = 0.022,Q2.3 p = 0.008,Q3.1 = 0.014,Q4.1 p = 0.036,Q4.2 p = 0.002)。相反,住院医师在切换到RACE模型后,除了缝合线到血管边缘的距离外,所有参数都立即得到改善。
头颈RACE模型为显微外科教学提供了具有挑战性且实用的补充。
对该领域学习成果的积极影响支持在显微外科和普通医学培训的其他领域开发RACE模型,从而支持学生和临床从业者的教育。