Multi-disciplinary collaboration in diagnosing thymic hyperplasia in a Graves' disease patient.

SUMMARY

Thymic hyperplasia in Graves' disease is rarely identified due to the absence of routine imaging, but not uncommonly present. It is usually seen when imaging is performed for other reasons. Despite thymic hyperplasia becoming a more commonly identified occurrence, follow-up imaging scans and multi-disciplinary team (MDT) approach are still recommended to distinguish this benign transformation from more significant differentials. These steps can lead to distress in patients. Therefore, clinicians and radiologists being aware of this correlation between thymic hyperplasia and Graves' disease can add reassurances about the most likely diagnosis whilst the patient is undergoing limited further investigation to rule out differentials and subsequently, avoid unnecessary intervention. Here, we report a case of Graves' disease with thymic hyperplasia in a young woman who initially presented with non-specific eye symptoms and incidental mediastinal mass, in which involvement of multiple speciality teams was important to rule out thymoma and myasthenia gravis (MG).

LEARNING POINTS

Although Graves' disease with thymic hyperplasia is not uncommon, it is sometimes difficult to diagnose with one imaging scan due to the overlap of radiological characteristics of other important differentials; an MDT discussion and further imaging scans are needed to confirm the diagnosis in some cases. Getting MDT involvement early would quickly assist in ruling out more significant differentials and avoid unnecessary surgical intervention by concluding thymic hyperplasia. Clinicians having knowledge on the relation between Graves' disease and thymic hyperplasia may reassure the patient by explaining the possible resolution with treatment, while awaiting further MDT discussion. To rule out ocular MG in Graves' disease patients, additional investigations and neurology referral are often required as the serum antibody tests are less sensitive in ocular MG than generalised MG.