Takasaki Hiroshi
Department of Physical Therapy, Saitama Prefectural University, Koshigaya, 343-8540, Japan.
Center for Human Movement, Tokyo University of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 9;15(1):12087. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96449-x.
Katakori, or neck and shoulder stiffness, is a common issue in Japan but also affects people globally. Recently, the Katakori Disability Index (KDI) was developed to measure the disability caused by Katakori, but its cross-cultural validity was unconfirmed. This study examined the KDI's validity across Japan, the US, and Singapore through cross-sectional surveys of individuals aged 20-69 experiencing Katakori. Using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA), cross-cultural validity was deemed to exist if no statistically significant difference was found after changing to the partial metric invariance. Further, internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha, and KDI scores across the three countries were compared. MGCFA established cross-cultural validity by achieving partial metric invariance in 26 of 55 item combinations. Prevalence was 61.8% (420/680 participants) in the US and 75.1% (417/555 participants) in Singapore. Singaporeans (n = 162) reported the highest % KDI scores, followed by the US (n = 149), with the lowest scores being observed in Japan (n = 515). Internal consistency was strong across all countries (95% CI of alpha > 0.9). In conclusion, the KDI is valid for measuring Katakori disability across Japan, the US, and Singapore. This study underscores the need for global research on Katakori.
肩颈僵硬,即颈部和肩部僵硬,在日本是一个常见问题,但在全球范围内也影响着人们。最近,开发了肩颈僵硬残疾指数(KDI)来衡量由肩颈僵硬引起的残疾,但尚未确认其跨文化效度。本研究通过对20至69岁有肩颈僵硬症状的个体进行横断面调查,检验了KDI在日本、美国和新加坡的效度。使用多组验证性因素分析(MGCFA),如果在改为部分度量不变性后未发现统计学上的显著差异,则认为存在跨文化效度。此外,使用克朗巴哈系数评估内部一致性,并比较了三个国家的KDI得分。MGCFA通过在55个项目组合中的26个实现部分度量不变性,确立了跨文化效度。在美国,患病率为61.8%(420/680名参与者),在新加坡为75.1%(417/555名参与者)。新加坡人(n = 162)报告的KDI得分百分比最高,其次是美国(n = 149),得分最低的是日本(n = 515)。所有国家的内部一致性都很强(克朗巴哈系数的95%置信区间> 0.9)。总之,KDI对于衡量日本、美国和新加坡的肩颈僵硬残疾是有效的。本研究强调了对肩颈僵硬进行全球研究的必要性。