Honinx Elisabeth, Broes Stefanie, Roekaerts Bente, Huys Isabelle, Janssens Rosanne
Moonbird B.V., Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2023 Aug 8;1(3):395-405. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.06.008. eCollection 2023 Sep.
To identify, evaluate, and summarize existing meditation and breathing devices for stress reduction and their characteristics (stimuli), we searched PubMed and EMBASE for studies published from January 1, 1980, to December 30, 2021. Full-text articles that presented devices that support meditation and breathing guidance for stress reduction were included. We excluded articles covering study protocols. In addition, a competitor analysis was conducted to identify and evaluate the devices, their name, manufacturer, target group, function, and incorporated stimuli were contracted. The scientific literature identified 367 studies, of which 20 (describing 18 devices and 32 stimuli) were included. The competition analysis identified 66 devices incorporating 126 stimuli. After exclusion of duplicates, this resulted in 46 different types of devices incorporating 24 different types of stimuli. They were organized into 7 device categories (attachable to the head, huggable devices, handheld devices, eye masks, mouth-controlled devices, toys, and wearables) and 14 stimuli categories (perceptible vibrations, imperceptible vibrations, movement, temperature, pressure, texture, light or darkness, abstract visuals, concrete visuals, music, calming sounds, tones, voice guidance, and aromas). This review provides an overview of the different meditation and breathing devices for stress reduction. The current overview will inform a subsequent preference and effectiveness study of breathing devices that aims to gain more knowledge on the topic to increase device uptake and developmental success.
为了识别、评估和总结现有的用于减轻压力的冥想和呼吸设备及其特点(刺激因素),我们在PubMed和EMBASE上搜索了1980年1月1日至2021年12月30日发表的研究。纳入了介绍支持减轻压力的冥想和呼吸指导的设备的全文文章。我们排除了涵盖研究方案的文章。此外,还进行了竞争分析,以识别和评估这些设备,其名称、制造商、目标群体、功能以及所包含的刺激因素均有记录。科学文献共识别出367项研究,其中20项(描述了18种设备和32种刺激因素)被纳入。竞争分析识别出66种包含126种刺激因素的设备。排除重复项后,这产生了46种不同类型的设备,包含24种不同类型的刺激因素。它们被分为7类设备(可附着在头部的设备、可拥抱的设备、手持设备、眼罩、口控设备、玩具和可穿戴设备)和14类刺激因素(可感知的振动、不可感知的振动、运动、温度、压力、质地、光或暗、抽象视觉、具体视觉、音乐、舒缓的声音、音调、语音指导和香气)。本综述概述了不同的用于减轻压力的冥想和呼吸设备。当前的概述将为后续关于呼吸设备的偏好和有效性研究提供信息,该研究旨在获取更多关于该主题的知识,以提高设备的采用率和开发成功率。