Marino Daniel, Farrakhan Kanhai, Pearlstein Ethan, Monteiro Joao Filipe, Patwa Sohum, Mohamed Mouhand, Mitsuyama Rei, Kothadia Savan, Chokshi Aastha, Rich Harlan, Asombang Akwi
Division of Gastroenterology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Division of Gastroenterology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, 11796, USA.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 10;25(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03536-w.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is important in the management of pancreatobiliary diseases and requires fluoroscopy resulting in radiation exposure to those involved. ERCP is performed in different hospital settings such as the endoscopy unit (EU), radiology suite (RS), and operating room (OR) depending on numerous factors. Our study examines the differences in duration of fluoroscopy time (FT) as a surrogate for radiation dosages between multiple unique settings.
A retrospective cohort analysis at multiple tertiary academic centers was performed on 3251 ERCPs performed between April 2015 to November 2021. FT was compared between multiple locations, between different fluoroscopy device operators, and between normal working hours versus after hours.
Of the 3228 included patients, 54.8% (n = 1768) patients had an exam in the EU, 37.9% (n = 1223) RS or 7.3% (n = 237) or OR respectively. The average FT in the EU, RS, and OR was 6.0 min, 3.5 min, and 4.1 min respectively. The average FT of the EU was significantly more than the RS, OR, and RS and OR together. The average FT of the cases in the OR was significantly less than cases done outside of the OR (5.0 min). FT during working hours (5.0 min) was significantly longer than FT outside of working hours (3.3 min).
FT in the EU was longer than in the OR and RS. Locations in which ERCPs were performed by the endoscopist had a longer average FT than those with technician-controlled fluoroscopy.
内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)在胰胆疾病的治疗中具有重要作用,且需要荧光透视,这会使相关人员受到辐射暴露。根据多种因素,ERCP在不同的医院环境中进行,如内镜室(EU)、放射科(RS)和手术室(OR)。我们的研究探讨了作为辐射剂量替代指标的荧光透视时间(FT)在多个不同环境中的差异。
对2015年4月至2021年11月期间在多个三级学术中心进行的3251例ERCP进行回顾性队列分析。比较了多个地点之间、不同荧光透视设备操作员之间以及正常工作时间与非工作时间的FT。
在纳入的3228例患者中,分别有54.8%(n = 1768)的患者在EU进行检查,37.9%(n = 1223)在RS或7.3%(n = 237)在OR进行检查。EU、RS和OR的平均FT分别为6.0分钟、3.5分钟和4.1分钟。EU的平均FT显著高于RS、OR以及RS和OR的总和。OR中病例的平均FT显著低于手术室以外进行的病例(5.0分钟)。工作时间的FT(5.0分钟)显著长于非工作时间的FT(3.3分钟)。
EU中的FT长于OR和RS。由内镜医师进行ERCP的地点的平均FT比由技术人员控制荧光透视的地点更长。