Why Should I Review for Arthroplasty Today? The Benefits of Becoming a Peer Reviewer.
作者信息
Rainey Joshua P
机构信息
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
出版信息
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Mar 21;32:101677. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101677. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Why Should I Review for Arthroplasty Today? The Benefits of Becoming a Peer Reviewer.我为何要在今天参与关节置换术的评审？成为同行评审员的益处。
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Mar 21;32:101677. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101677. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Why Participate in Peer Review as a Journal Manuscript Reviewer: What's in It for You?为何要作为期刊稿件评审人参与同行评审：这对你有什么好处？
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jun;156(6):976-977. doi: 10.1177/0194599816669661. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
3
JACLP Guide for Manuscript Peer Review: How to Perform a Peer Review and How to Be Responsive to Reviewer Comments.JACLP 稿件同行评审指南：如何进行同行评审以及如何回复评审意见。
J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2023 Sep-Oct;64(5):468-472. doi: 10.1016/j.jaclp.2023.01.011. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
4
Tips and guidelines for being a good peer reviewer.成为优秀同行评审人的技巧和指南。
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Mar;46(3):215-235. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2022.03.005. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
5
Investing in the Academic Writing: Training Future Reviewers and Sustaining Efficient and Quality Peer Review.投资学术写作：培养未来的审稿人并维持高效且高质量的同行评审。
Cureus. 2022 Oct 16;14(10):e30341. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30341. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
Reviewer training for improving grant and journal peer review.为改进基金和期刊同行评审而进行的审稿人培训。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 28;11(11):MR000056. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000056.pub2.
7
Manuscript review continuing medical education: a retrospective investigation of the learning outcomes from this peer reviewer benefit.稿件评审继续医学教育：对这种同行评审获益的学习成果进行回顾性调查。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 24;10(11):e039687. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039687.
8
Peer Review as a Professional Obligation: Steps and Tips to Becoming a High-Quality Reviewer.同行评审作为一项职业义务：成为高质量评审员的步骤与技巧
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Dec;29(6):570-577. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.6.570. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
9
Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models.对采用开放或单盲同行评审模式的期刊中，由作者推荐和非作者推荐的审稿人所撰写报告的质量进行回顾性分析。
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 29;5(9):e008707. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008707.
10
On becoming a peer reviewer for a neuropsychology journal.成为神经心理学杂志的同行评审员。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009 May;24(3):201-7. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acp031. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
本文引用的文献
1
The history of the peer-review process.同行评审过程的历史。
Trends Biotechnol. 2002 Aug;20(8):357-8. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7799(02)01985-6.
2
The evolution of editorial peer review.编辑同行评审的演变
JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1323-9.
Zotero 插件