• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用机器学习算法结合形态特征预测奶牛体重

Prediction of Body Mass of Dairy Cattle Using Machine Learning Algorithms Applied to Morphological Characteristics.

作者信息

de Oliveira Franck Morais, Ferraz Patrícia Ferreira Ponciano, Ferraz Gabriel Araújo E Silva, Pereira Marcos Neves, Barbari Matteo, Rossi Giuseppe

机构信息

Department of Agricultural Engineering, School of Engineering, Federal University of Lavras (UFLA), Lavras 37203-202, Brazil.

Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Lavras (UFLA), Lavras 37203-202, Brazil.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2025 Apr 5;15(7):1054. doi: 10.3390/ani15071054.

DOI:10.3390/ani15071054
PMID:40218447
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11987758/
Abstract

The accurate prediction of body mass (BM) in cattle is crucial for herd monitoring, assessing biological efficiency, and optimizing nutritional management. This study evaluated BM prediction models using morphological data from 465 lactating Holstein cows, including the dorsal length (DL), thoracic width (TW), abdominal width (AW), rump width (RW), hip height (HH), body depth (BD), thoracic perimeter (TP), and abdominal perimeter (AP). Spearman's correlation analysis identified TP (r = 0.89), AP (r = 0.88), and RW (r = 0.80) as the strongest predictors. Simple and multiple linear regression models, artificial neural networks (ANNs), and Support Vector Regression (SVR) were tested. The dataset was split into 90% for training (419 samples), 5% for validation (23 samples), and 5% for testing (23 samples). The best simple model, using only TP, achieved an R of 0.7763 and an RMSE of 43.69 kg. A multiple regression model with TP, AP, and RW improved performance (R = 0.9067, RMSE = 28.00 kg). The ANN outperformed all of the models (R = 0.9125, RMSE = 25.86 kg), and was followed by SVR (R = 0.9046, RMSE = 27.41 kg). As an indication of the evaluation of the results obtained, it is observed that, although regression models are effective, the ANNs and SVR provide greater accuracy, reinforcing their potential for herd management. However, simpler models remain viable alternatives for practical on-farm application.

摘要

准确预测奶牛的体重对于牛群监测、评估生物效率以及优化营养管理至关重要。本研究使用465头泌乳期荷斯坦奶牛的形态学数据评估体重预测模型,这些数据包括背长(DL)、胸宽(TW)、腹宽(AW)、臀宽(RW)、体高(HH)、体深(BD)、胸围(TP)和腹围(AP)。Spearman相关性分析确定胸围(r = 0.89)、腹围(r = 0.88)和臀宽(r = 0.80)是最强的预测指标。测试了简单和多元线性回归模型、人工神经网络(ANN)和支持向量回归(SVR)。数据集被分为90%用于训练(419个样本)、5%用于验证(23个样本)和5%用于测试(23个样本)。仅使用胸围的最佳简单模型的R值为0.7763,均方根误差(RMSE)为43.69千克。包含胸围、腹围和臀宽的多元回归模型性能有所提高(R = 0.9067,RMSE = 28.00千克)。人工神经网络的表现优于所有模型(R = 0.9125,RMSE = 25.86千克),其次是支持向量回归(R = 0.9046,RMSE = 27.41千克)。作为对所得结果评估情况的一种说明,可以观察到,尽管回归模型有效,但人工神经网络和支持向量回归提供了更高的准确性,这强化了它们在牛群管理中的潜力。然而,更简单的模型对于农场实际应用来说仍是可行的替代方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/11987758/30154fc9d8f1/animals-15-01054-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/11987758/5c236fa3c6f8/animals-15-01054-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/11987758/fa8bc9b0237f/animals-15-01054-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/11987758/d92e8cbcb953/animals-15-01054-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/11987758/1e516e59612b/animals-15-01054-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/11987758/98971f72b0ca/animals-15-01054-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/11987758/a8d3f65594b8/animals-15-01054-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/11987758/d9af7941e995/animals-15-01054-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/11987758/012692008a8a/animals-15-01054-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/11987758/c1abd3fd4763/animals-15-01054-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/11987758/07a725d7be18/animals-15-01054-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/11987758/30154fc9d8f1/animals-15-01054-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/11987758/5c236fa3c6f8/animals-15-01054-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/11987758/fa8bc9b0237f/animals-15-01054-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/11987758/d92e8cbcb953/animals-15-01054-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/11987758/1e516e59612b/animals-15-01054-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/11987758/98971f72b0ca/animals-15-01054-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/11987758/a8d3f65594b8/animals-15-01054-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/11987758/d9af7941e995/animals-15-01054-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/11987758/012692008a8a/animals-15-01054-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/11987758/c1abd3fd4763/animals-15-01054-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/11987758/07a725d7be18/animals-15-01054-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e28/11987758/30154fc9d8f1/animals-15-01054-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of Body Mass of Dairy Cattle Using Machine Learning Algorithms Applied to Morphological Characteristics.运用机器学习算法结合形态特征预测奶牛体重
Animals (Basel). 2025 Apr 5;15(7):1054. doi: 10.3390/ani15071054.
2
Prediction of body condition in Jersey dairy cattle from 3D-images using machine learning techniques.利用机器学习技术从 3D 图像预测泽西奶牛的体况。
J Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 3;101. doi: 10.1093/jas/skad376.
3
Predicting methane emission in Canadian Holstein dairy cattle using milk mid-infrared reflectance spectroscopy and other commonly available predictors via artificial neural networks.利用牛奶中红外反射光谱和其他常用预测因子通过人工神经网络预测加拿大荷斯坦奶牛的甲烷排放量。
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Oct;105(10):8272-8285. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-21176. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
4
[Machine Learning-based Dissolved Oxygen Prediction Modeling and Evaluation in the Yangtze River Estuary].基于机器学习的长江口溶解氧预测建模与评估
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2024 Dec 8;45(12):7123-7133. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202312111.
5
Can machine learning algorithms perform better than multiple linear regression in predicting nitrogen excretion from lactating dairy cows.机器学习算法在预测泌乳奶牛氮排泄量方面是否比多元线性回归表现更好。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 21;12(1):12478. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16490-y.
6
Evaluating the performance of machine learning methods and variable selection methods for predicting difficult-to-measure traits in Holstein dairy cattle using milk infrared spectral data.利用牛奶近红外光谱数据评估机器学习方法和变量选择方法在荷斯坦奶牛中预测难以测量性状的性能。
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Jul;104(7):8107-8121. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19861. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
7
Predicting dry matter intake in Canadian Holstein dairy cattle using milk mid-infrared reflectance spectroscopy and other commonly available predictors via artificial neural networks.利用牛奶中红外反射光谱和其他常用预测因子通过人工神经网络预测加拿大荷斯坦奶牛的干物质采食量。
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Oct;105(10):8257-8271. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-21297. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
8
Development and comparative analysis of ANN and SVR-based models with conventional regression models for predicting spray drift.基于人工神经网络(ANN)和支持向量回归(SVR)的模型与传统回归模型在预测喷雾漂移方面的开发及比较分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(8):21927-21944. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23571-y. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
9
Predicting the dry matter intake of grazing dairy cows using infrared reflectance spectroscopy analysis.利用近红外反射光谱分析预测放牧奶牛的干物质采食量。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Oct;102(10):8907-8918. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16363. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
10
Predicting dry matter intake in cattle at scale using gradient boosting regression techniques and Gaussian process boosting regression with Shapley additive explanation explainable artificial intelligence, MLflow, and its containerization.使用梯度提升回归技术以及带有夏普利值加法解释的高斯过程提升回归、可解释人工智能、MLflow及其容器化来大规模预测牛的干物质摄入量。
J Anim Sci. 2025 Jan 4;103. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaf041.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital and Precision Technologies in Dairy Cattle Farming: A Bibliometric Analysis.奶牛养殖中的数字与精准技术:文献计量分析
Animals (Basel). 2024 Jun 20;14(12):1832. doi: 10.3390/ani14121832.
2
A systematic review of the cost of ketosis in dairy cattle.奶牛酮病的成本系统评价。
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Jul;105(7):6175-6195. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-21539. Epub 2022 May 6.
3
ASAS-NANP SYMPOSIUM: Applications of machine learning for livestock body weight prediction from digital images.ASAS-NANP 研讨会:机器学习在基于数字图像的家畜体重预测中的应用。
J Anim Sci. 2021 Feb 1;99(2). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab022.
4
Methionine precursor effects on lactation performance of dairy cows fed raw or heated soybeans.蛋氨酸前体对饲喂生大豆或加热大豆奶牛泌乳性能的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Mar;104(3):2996-3007. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-18696. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
5
Body weight prediction using body size measurements in Fleckvieh, Holstein, and Brown Swiss dairy cows in lactation and dry periods.利用泌乳期和干奶期的弗莱维赫牛、荷斯坦牛和瑞士褐牛的体尺测量预测体重
Arch Anim Breed. 2018 Oct 30;61(4):413-424. doi: 10.5194/aab-61-413-2018. eCollection 2018.
6
A Comprehensive Analysis of Deep Regression.深度回归分析的全面分析。
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2020 Sep;42(9):2065-2081. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2910523. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
7
Random Forest.随机森林
J Insur Med. 2017;47(1):31-39. doi: 10.17849/insm-47-01-31-39.1.
8
Short communication: Verifying Holstein heifer heart girth to body weight prediction equations.短篇交流:验证荷斯坦小母牛胸围与体重预测方程。
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Oct;100(10):8451-8454. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12496. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
9
Technical note: Estimating body weight and body composition of beef cattle trough digital image analysis.技术说明:通过数字图像分析估算肉牛的体重和身体组成。
J Anim Sci. 2016 Dec;94(12):5414-5422. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016-0797.
10
Harnessing the genetics of the modern dairy cow to continue improvements in feed efficiency.利用现代奶牛的遗传学特性来持续提高饲料效率。
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Jun;99(6):4941-4954. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10352. Epub 2016 Apr 13.