• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响护士政治参与或医疗政策干预的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述与定性元综合分析

The Barriers and Facilitators Influencing Nurses' Political Participation or Healthcare Policy Intervention: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.

作者信息

Han Nam Kyung, Kim Gwang Suk

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Gyeongbuk College of Health, Daehakro 168 Gimcheon City, Gyeongbuk 39525, Republic of Korea.

Mo-im Kim Nursing Research Institute, College of Nursing, Yonsei University 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Nurs Manag. 2024 Jun 28;2024:2606855. doi: 10.1155/2024/2606855. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1155/2024/2606855
PMID:40224832
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11919103/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nurses, who comprise the largest proportion of healthcare professionals, must advocate for public health in a changing healthcare environment. Therefore, nurses have a social responsibility to be interested in politics, political participation, or healthcare policy interventions as leaders in healthcare policy reforms. However, previous research has reported that nurses' political interests and participation are insufficient in most countries.

AIM

This study systematically reviewed and synthesized qualitative data to identify the barriers and facilitators influencing nurses' political participation and healthcare policy interventions.

METHODS

This study performed a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. Literature searches were conducted using seven databases to comprehensively examine published journals, including doctoral dissertations, until December 31, 2023. The selection criteria for this study were articles analyzed using phenomenology, ethnography, qualitative research, and grounded theory, targeting nurses with extensive experience in healthcare policy intervention and political activities. Two researchers, professors in nursing with extensive experience in healthcare policy interventions and qualitative research screened the qualitative studies and extracted the data. Eighteen papers were analyzed, and the quality of each study was evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program Qualitative Checklist. Meta-ethnography was applied as the qualitative meta-synthesis method using ATLAS. ti.

RESULTS

Barriers include nurses' lack of political interest and competence, nursing education, restrictive organizational cultures, and the nursing profession's political activities. Facilitators include recognizing social responsibilities, enhancing political competence, innovating organizational environments, and strengthening nursing organizations' political activities and policy interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

This study could be used as data to enhance nurses' political participation and to plan policy interventions and strategies. . To activate nurses' political participation in the future, it is necessary to develop strategies, such as developing nursing political education programs and expanding opportunities for policy intervention.

摘要

背景

护士占医疗保健专业人员的比例最大,在不断变化的医疗环境中,他们必须倡导公共卫生。因此,作为医疗政策改革的领导者,护士有社会责任关注政治、参与政治或进行医疗政策干预。然而,先前的研究报告称,在大多数国家,护士的政治兴趣和参与度不足。

目的

本研究系统地回顾和综合了定性数据,以确定影响护士政治参与和医疗政策干预的障碍和促进因素。

方法

本研究进行了系统回顾和定性元分析。使用七个数据库进行文献检索,以全面审查已发表的期刊,包括博士论文,检索截至2023年12月31日。本研究的选择标准是使用现象学、民族志、定性研究和扎根理论进行分析的文章,目标是在医疗政策干预和政治活动方面有丰富经验的护士。两位研究人员,即具有医疗政策干预和定性研究丰富经验的护理学教授,对定性研究进行筛选并提取数据。分析了18篇论文,并使用批判性评估技能计划定性检查表评估每项研究的质量。使用ATLAS.ti将元民族志作为定性元分析方法。

结果

障碍包括护士缺乏政治兴趣和能力、护理教育、限制性的组织文化以及护理专业的政治活动。促进因素包括认识到社会责任、提高政治能力、创新组织环境以及加强护理组织的政治活动和政策干预。

结论

本研究可作为数据,以提高护士的政治参与度,并规划政策干预措施和策略。为了在未来激发护士的政治参与,有必要制定策略,如开展护理政治教育项目和扩大政策干预机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1de/11919103/311426a68d2f/JONM2024-2606855.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1de/11919103/07f11cf1ee36/JONM2024-2606855.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1de/11919103/311426a68d2f/JONM2024-2606855.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1de/11919103/07f11cf1ee36/JONM2024-2606855.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1de/11919103/311426a68d2f/JONM2024-2606855.002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Barriers and Facilitators Influencing Nurses' Political Participation or Healthcare Policy Intervention: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.影响护士政治参与或医疗政策干预的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述与定性元综合分析
J Nurs Manag. 2024 Jun 28;2024:2606855. doi: 10.1155/2024/2606855. eCollection 2024.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
4
Nurses' experiences of advocacy in the perioperative department: a systematic review.护士在围手术期科室的维权经历:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Sep 16;13(8):146-89. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2141.
5
Experiences of nurses caring for involuntary migrant maternal women: a qualitative systematic review.护士照顾非自愿移民产妇的体验:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Nov 1;20(11):2609-2655. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00181.
6
Experiences of registered nurses as managers and leaders in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review.注册护士在养老院的管理和领导经验:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011 Dec;9(4):388-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00239.x.
7
Enhancing nurses' involvement in policy making: A qualitative study of nurse leaders.增强护士参与政策制定:对护理领导者的定性研究。
Int Nurs Rev. 2023 Sep;70(3):297-306. doi: 10.1111/inr.12828. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
8
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
9
The facilitators and barriers to nurses' participation in continuing education programs: a mixed method explanatory sequential study.护士参与继续教育项目的促进因素和障碍:一项混合方法解释性序列研究。
Glob J Health Sci. 2014 Nov 30;7(3):184-93. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n3p184.
10
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Experiences of nurses and midwives in policy development in low- and middle-income countries: Qualitative systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家护士及助产士参与政策制定的经历:定性系统评价
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2022 Dec 17;5:100116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2022.100116. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Barriers to nurses health advocacy role.护士健康倡导角色的障碍。
Nurs Ethics. 2023 Sep;30(6):844-856. doi: 10.1177/09697330221146241. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
3
Exploration of knowledge, attitudes, and perceived benefits towards nurse managers' participation in the health policy-making process: a qualitative thematic analysis study.
对护士管理者参与卫生政策制定过程的知识、态度和感知益处的探索:一项定性主题分析研究。
J Res Nurs. 2022 Nov;27(6):560-571. doi: 10.1177/17449871221080719. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
4
Let it not be that nursing that asks for silence: participation in social movements and sociopolitical-emancipatory knowledge.
Rev Bras Enferm. 2022 Apr 15;75(4):e20210630. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0630. eCollection 2022.
5
Policy Advocacy and Nursing Organizations: A Scoping Review.政策倡导与护理组织:范围综述。
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2021 Nov;22(4):271-291. doi: 10.1177/15271544211050611.
6
How and why nurses became involved in politics or political action, and the outcomes or impacts of this involvement.护士如何以及为何参与政治或政治行动,以及这种参与的结果或影响。
Nurs Outlook. 2022 Jan-Feb;70(1):55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2021.07.008. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
7
A policy review of the process of the Integrated Nursing Care Service System in South Korea.
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Nov;30(8):3933-3941. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13441. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
8
Factors influencing nurses participation in the health policy-making process: a systematic review.影响护士参与卫生政策制定过程的因素:一项系统综述
BMC Nurs. 2021 Jul 12;20(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00648-6.
9
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
10
Nurses' and midwives' perspectives on participation in national policy development, review and reforms in Ghana: a qualitative study.加纳护士和助产士对参与国家政策制定、审查及改革的看法:一项定性研究
BMC Nurs. 2021 Jan 22;20(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00545-y.