Chen Qirong, Halili Xirongguli, Chen Wenjun, Zhao Junqiang, Castro Aimee R, Tang Siyuan, Wang Honghong, Xia Yuting, Wang Guiyun, Huang Chongmei
Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha 410000, China.
Xiangya Center for Evidence-Based Practice & Healthcare Innovation: A Joanna Briggs Institute Affiliated Group, Central South University, Changsha 410000, China.
J Nurs Manag. 2023 Sep 19;2023:2955731. doi: 10.1155/2023/2955731. eCollection 2023.
To explore academic and clinical nurses' perceptions and experiences on academic-practice partnership in evidence-based practice.
Academic-practice partnership could promote evidence-based practice which is crucial for high-quality care. Academic and clinical nurses are the foundation of the partnerships; however, there is little knowledge of their perceptions and experiences on academic-practice partnership in evidence-based practice.
This is an interpretive description study. Twenty-two eligible participants were interviewed through face-to-face or online videoconferencing meetings. Guiding questions for the interviews focused on the perceptions and experiences of academic-practice partnership in the context of evidence-based practice. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and checked verbatim. We used constant comparative analysis to analyze the qualitative data.
Four themes with fifteen subthemes were generated: necessities, modes, challenges, and benefits of the academic-practice partnership in evidence-based practice. Participants believed that academic-practice partnership was a necessary strategy to promote evidence-based practice and could be built through different modes. Nevertheless, most academic-practice partnerships were superficial because of specific types of challenges. However, a good academic-practice partnership could create a win-win situation for both nursing academia and clinical practice.
Academic-practice partnership is a win-win strategy for both the academic side and clinical side to promote evidence-based practice. Different modes of academic-practice partnership provide academic and clinical nurses with more opportunities to promote evidence-based practice with a higher likelihood of successful implementation. However, related challenges require multilevel measures to provide better environments to initiate, build, and maintain intensive collaborations between academic and clinical nurses. . Academic and clinical organizations, leaders, and individuals should take multilevel measures to initiate, build, and maintain a close academic-practice partnership to promote evidence-based practice, which is crucial for high-quality nursing care, patient safety, and nursing discipline development.
探讨学术型护士和临床护士对循证实践中学术-实践伙伴关系的认知与体验。
学术-实践伙伴关系可促进循证实践，而循证实践对高质量护理至关重要。学术型护士和临床护士是这种伙伴关系的基础；然而，对于他们在循证实践中学术-实践伙伴关系的认知和体验却知之甚少。
这是一项诠释性描述研究。通过面对面或在线视频会议对22名符合条件的参与者进行了访谈。访谈的指导性问题聚焦于循证实践背景下学术-实践伙伴关系的认知与体验。访谈进行了录音、转录并逐字核对。我们采用持续比较分析法对定性数据进行分析。
产生了四个主题及十五个子主题：循证实践中学术-实践伙伴关系的必要性、模式、挑战和益处。参与者认为学术-实践伙伴关系是促进循证实践的必要策略，且可通过不同模式建立。然而，由于特定类型的挑战，大多数学术-实践伙伴关系较为表面。不过，良好的学术-实践伙伴关系可为护理学术界和临床实践创造双赢局面。
学术-实践伙伴关系是学术方和临床方促进循证实践的双赢策略。不同的学术-实践伙伴关系模式为学术型护士和临床护士提供了更多促进循证实践的机会，且成功实施的可能性更高。然而，相关挑战需要采取多层次措施，以提供更好的环境来启动、建立和维持学术型护士与临床护士之间的深入合作。学术和临床组织、领导者及个人应采取多层次措施来启动、建立和维持紧密的学术-实践伙伴关系，以促进循证实践，这对高质量护理、患者安全和护理学科发展至关重要。
