• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于综合生态系统服务指数的滇中地区生态系统服务能力最优尺度评估

Evaluation of Ecosystem Service Capacity Using the Integrated Ecosystem Services Index at Optimal Scale in Central Yunnan, China.

作者信息

Liu Lanfang, Wang Jinliang, Li Jie, He Suling, Lan Yongcui, Liu Fang

机构信息

Faculty of Geography Yunnan Normal University Kunming China.

Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing for Universities in Yunnan Kunming China.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2025 Apr 11;15(4):e71222. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71222. eCollection 2025 Apr.

DOI:10.1002/ece3.71222
PMID:40225892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11992009/
Abstract

Understanding and quantifying the dynamic features of local ecosystem services (ESs) and integrating diverse ecosystem assessment results form crucial foundations for regional ES management. However, existing methods for integrating and objectively evaluating multiple ESs remain limited. Consequently, this research evaluates four key services based on the InVEST and RUSLE models in the Central Yunnan Province (CYP)-from 2000 to 2020: water yield (WY), carbon storage (CS), habitat quality (HQ), and soil conservation (SC). It then constructs an Integrated Ecosystem Service Index (IESI) using principal component analysis (PCA). Additionally, this study explores the factors driving the spatial divergence of ESs by employing the optimal parameter-based geographical detector model (OPGD) at the optimal spatial scale. The results indicated that (1) the IESI was effectively applied in the CYP and could quantitatively and comprehensively integrate the assessment results of the four key ESs. (2) During the study period, the ESs in the CYP showed increasing trends for WY, HQ, and SC, while CS showed a decreasing trend. (3) The IESI during the study period exhibited a trend of initially decreasing and then increasing. The average IESI values for CYP were 0.7338 in 2000, 0.6981 in 2005, 0.6947 in 2010, 0.6650 in 2015, and 0.6992 in 2020. (4) A 4500 m × 4500 m grid was identified as the optimal spatial scale for detecting the spatial divergence of comprehensive ecosystem service (CES) in CYP, and relief degree of land surface (RDLS), slope, and the NDVI were the top three drivers based on q-values. This study offers a more scientific and effective method for evaluating regional CES. It also provides a comprehensive analytical tool for balancing land use competition and assessing the effectiveness of policy implementation.

摘要

理解和量化当地生态系统服务(ESs)的动态特征,并整合多样的生态系统评估结果,是区域生态系统服务管理的关键基础。然而,现有的整合和客观评估多种生态系统服务的方法仍然有限。因此,本研究基于InVEST和RUSLE模型,对2000年至2020年的滇中地区(CYP)的四项关键服务进行了评估:产水量(WY)、碳储量(CS)、栖息地质量(HQ)和土壤保持(SC)。然后,利用主成分分析(PCA)构建了综合生态系统服务指数(IESI)。此外,本研究通过在最优空间尺度上采用基于最优参数的地理探测器模型(OPGD),探讨了驱动生态系统服务空间分异的因素。结果表明:(1)IESI在滇中地区得到了有效应用,能够定量、全面地整合四项关键生态系统服务的评估结果。(2)在研究期间,滇中地区的产水量、栖息地质量和土壤保持呈增加趋势,而碳储量呈下降趋势。(3)研究期间IESI呈现先下降后上升的趋势。滇中地区2000年、2005年、2010年、2015年和2020年的IESI平均值分别为0.7338、0.6981、0.6947、0.6650和0.6992。(4)4500 m×4500 m网格被确定为检测滇中地区综合生态系统服务(CES)空间分异的最优空间尺度,基于q值,地形起伏度(RDLS)、坡度和归一化植被指数(NDVI)是前三大驱动因素。本研究为评估区域CES提供了一种更科学有效的方法。它还为平衡土地利用竞争和评估政策实施效果提供了一个综合分析工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d439/11992009/408d7f88a975/ECE3-15-e71222-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d439/11992009/cec3221ed06a/ECE3-15-e71222-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d439/11992009/3d0a7ba0ba6b/ECE3-15-e71222-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d439/11992009/17d1f71fa8c1/ECE3-15-e71222-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d439/11992009/8e7280edadcd/ECE3-15-e71222-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d439/11992009/f715fa599751/ECE3-15-e71222-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d439/11992009/f9e8a97e780a/ECE3-15-e71222-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d439/11992009/02242e783115/ECE3-15-e71222-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d439/11992009/af0eccd05ede/ECE3-15-e71222-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d439/11992009/c01661b626cd/ECE3-15-e71222-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d439/11992009/408d7f88a975/ECE3-15-e71222-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d439/11992009/cec3221ed06a/ECE3-15-e71222-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d439/11992009/3d0a7ba0ba6b/ECE3-15-e71222-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d439/11992009/17d1f71fa8c1/ECE3-15-e71222-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d439/11992009/8e7280edadcd/ECE3-15-e71222-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d439/11992009/f715fa599751/ECE3-15-e71222-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d439/11992009/f9e8a97e780a/ECE3-15-e71222-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d439/11992009/02242e783115/ECE3-15-e71222-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d439/11992009/af0eccd05ede/ECE3-15-e71222-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d439/11992009/c01661b626cd/ECE3-15-e71222-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d439/11992009/408d7f88a975/ECE3-15-e71222-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Ecosystem Service Capacity Using the Integrated Ecosystem Services Index at Optimal Scale in Central Yunnan, China.基于综合生态系统服务指数的滇中地区生态系统服务能力最优尺度评估
Ecol Evol. 2025 Apr 11;15(4):e71222. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71222. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
[Analysis of Spatial Distribution of Ecosystem Services and Driving Factors in Northeast China].[中国东北地区生态系统服务空间分布及驱动因素分析]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2024 Sep 8;45(9):5385-5394. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202311022.
3
Spatial heterogeneity and management challenges of ecosystem service trade-offs: a case study in Guangdong Province, China.生态系统服务权衡的空间异质性与管理挑战:以中国广东省为例。
Environ Manage. 2024 Feb;73(2):378-394. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01851-8. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
4
Exploring the evolution of coupled natural-cultural ecosystem services and their geographically scaled driven modeling in a coastal city of Southeast China.探索中国东南沿海城市耦合的自然-文化生态系统服务的演变及其地理尺度驱动模型。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;361:121265. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121265. Epub 2024 May 30.
5
Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of ecosystem services on Hainan Island from 1985 to 2022: Insights from long-term annual assessments and spatial econometric models.1985年至2022年海南岛生态系统服务的时空演变及影响因素:基于长期年度评估和空间计量模型的见解
J Environ Manage. 2025 May;382:125450. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125450. Epub 2025 Apr 18.
6
Identifying ecosystem service bundles and the spatiotemporal characteristics of trade-offs and synergies in coal mining areas with a high groundwater table.识别生态系统服务包以及高地下水位采煤区权衡和协同作用的时空特征。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 10;807(Pt 3):151036. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151036. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
7
Scale dependency of trade-offs/synergies analysis of ecosystem services based on Bayesian Belief Networks: A case of the Yellow River Basin.基于贝叶斯信念网络的生态系统服务权衡/协同分析的尺度依赖性:以黄河流域为例。
J Environ Manage. 2025 Feb;375:124410. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124410. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
8
Driving factors of ecosystem services and their spatiotemporal change assessment based on land use types in the Loess Plateau.基于黄土高原土地利用类型的生态系统服务驱动因素及其时空变化评估
J Environ Manage. 2022 Mar 17;311:114835. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114835.
9
Spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of ecosystem services' transformation in the Yellow River basin, China.中国黄河流域生态系统服务功能转化的时空演变及驱动因素
Environ Monit Assess. 2024 Feb 10;196(3):252. doi: 10.1007/s10661-024-12397-5.
10
Spatiotemporal characteristics and drivers of ecosystem service interactions in the Dongting Lake Basin.洞庭湖流域生态系统服务相互作用的时空特征及其驱动因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 May 20;926:172012. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172012. Epub 2024 Mar 28.

本文引用的文献

1
[Driving Factors Analysis for Spatial-Temporal Distribution of Organic Pollutants in the Yangtze River Delta Based on the Optimal-scale Geographical Detector].基于最优尺度地理探测器的长江三角洲有机污染物时空分布驱动因素分析
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2024 Jun 8;45(6):3480-3492. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202307039.
2
Exploring the evolution of coupled natural-cultural ecosystem services and their geographically scaled driven modeling in a coastal city of Southeast China.探索中国东南沿海城市耦合的自然-文化生态系统服务的演变及其地理尺度驱动模型。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;361:121265. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121265. Epub 2024 May 30.
3
Carbon storage through China's planted forest expansion.
通过中国人工林扩张实现的碳储存。
Nat Commun. 2024 May 15;15(1):4106. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48546-0.
4
A Prolonged Artificial Nighttime-light Dataset of China (1984-2020).中国长时间人工夜间灯光数据集(1984-2020)。
Sci Data. 2024 Apr 22;11(1):414. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03223-1.
5
Ecosystem services potential is declining across European capital metropolitan areas.欧洲主要首都城市地区的生态系统服务潜力正在下降。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 17;14(1):8903. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59333-8.
6
Knowledge diffusion of Geodetector: A perspective of the literature review and Geotree.地理探测器的知识扩散:文献综述与地理树视角
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 30;9(9):e19651. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19651. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
Distinguishing the relative contributions of landscape composition and configuration change on ecosystem health from a geospatial perspective.从地理空间角度区分景观组成和结构变化对生态系统健康的相对贡献。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Oct 10;894:165002. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165002. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
8
Inter-regional ecological compensation in the Yellow River Basin based on the value of ecosystem services.基于生态系统服务价值的黄河流域跨区域生态补偿
J Environ Manage. 2022 Nov 15;322:116073. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116073. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
9
Ecosystem service deficits of European cities.欧洲城市的生态系统服务赤字。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 1;837:155875. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155875. Epub 2022 May 12.
10
Using InVEST to evaluate water yield services in Shangri-La, Northwestern Yunnan, China.运用 InVEST 模型评估中国云南香格里拉西北部的水源涵养服务。
PeerJ. 2022 Jan 14;10:e12804. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12804. eCollection 2022.