Ness Torbjørn V, Tetzlaff Tom, Einevoll Gaute T, Dahmen David
Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Apr 14;21(4):e1012303. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012303. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Neural activity at the population level is commonly studied experimentally through measurements of electric brain signals like local field potentials (LFPs), or electroencephalography (EEG) signals. To allow for comparison between observed and simulated neural activity it is therefore important that simulations of neural activity can accurately predict these brain signals. Simulations of neural activity at the population level often rely on point-neuron network models or firing-rate models. While these simplified representations of neural activity are computationally efficient, they lack the explicit spatial information needed for calculating LFP/EEG signals. Different heuristic approaches have been suggested for overcoming this limitation, but the accuracy of these approaches has not fully been assessed. One such heuristic approach, the so-called kernel method, has previously been applied with promising results and has the additional advantage of being well-grounded in the biophysics underlying electric brain signal generation. It is based on calculating rate-to-LFP/EEG kernels for each synaptic pathway in a network model, after which LFP/EEG signals can be obtained directly from population firing rates. This amounts to a massive reduction in the computational effort of calculating brain signals because the brain signals are calculated for each population instead of for each neuron. Here, we investigate how and when the kernel method can be expected to work, and present a theoretical framework for predicting its accuracy. We show that the relative error of the brain signal predictions is a function of the single-cell kernel heterogeneity and the spike-train correlations. Finally, we demonstrate that the kernel method is most accurate for contributions which are also dominating the brain signals: spatially clustered and correlated synaptic input to large populations of pyramidal cells. We thereby further establish the kernel method as a promising approach for calculating electric brain signals from large-scale neural simulations.
在群体水平上的神经活动通常通过测量诸如局部场电位(LFP)或脑电图(EEG)信号等脑电信号进行实验研究。为了能够比较观察到的和模拟的神经活动,因此神经活动模拟能够准确预测这些脑电信号非常重要。群体水平上的神经活动模拟通常依赖于点神经元网络模型或发放率模型。虽然这些神经活动的简化表示在计算上是高效的,但它们缺乏计算LFP/EEG信号所需的明确空间信息。已经提出了不同的启发式方法来克服这一限制,但这些方法的准确性尚未得到充分评估。一种这样的启发式方法,即所谓的核方法,此前已得到应用并取得了有希望的结果,并且具有基于脑电信号产生的生物物理学原理的额外优势。它基于为网络模型中的每个突触通路计算发放率到LFP/EEG的核,之后LFP/EEG信号可以直接从群体发放率中获得。这相当于在计算脑电信号的计算量上有了大幅减少,因为脑电信号是针对每个群体而不是每个神经元进行计算的。在这里,我们研究核方法有望在何时以及如何起作用,并提出一个预测其准确性的理论框架。我们表明,脑电信号预测的相对误差是单细胞核异质性和脉冲序列相关性的函数。最后,我们证明核方法对于那些在脑电信号中也占主导地位的贡献最为准确:对大量锥体细胞的空间聚集且相关的突触输入。我们从而进一步将核方法确立为一种从大规模神经模拟中计算脑电信号的有前途的方法。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025-4-14
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022-8
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015-12-14
Neuroimage. 2021-1-15
J Neurosci Methods. 2020-10-1
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024-7
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2014
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021-4
Front Comput Neurosci. 2022-10-13
Front Neuroinform. 2022-9-22
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022-8
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2022
Phys Rev Lett. 2021-7-16