• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

汇总各国关节置换登记处的初次全膝关节置换植入物数据:多个登记处是否使用相同的植入物以及针对相同的患者群体?一项观察性研究。

Pooling data for primary total knee implants across national registries: is the same implant used in multiple registries and for the same patient group? An observational study.

作者信息

Hoogervorst Lotje, Nelissen Rob G H H, Van Steenbergen Liza, Pedersen Alma B, Kristiansen Eskild Bendix, Lindberg-Larsen Martin, Torre Marina, Ciminello Enrico, Valentini Riccardo, Grimberg Alexander W, Wu Yinan, Marang-van de Mheen Perla J

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI), 's- Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Acta Orthop. 2025 Apr 17;96:339-347. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2025.43476.

DOI:10.2340/17453674.2025.43476
PMID:40242884
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12006037/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Pooling data on the performance of total knee (TK) implants across registries is only possible if the same TK implant is used across multiple registries and if used in patients with similar characteristics. We assessed to what extent specific TK implants: (i) are used across multiple registries or only in a single registry; and (ii) differ in patient characteristics between registries.

METHODS

All primary TK implants implanted between January 2020 and December 2021 in the Danish, Dutch, German, and Italian registries were included. We determined the number of registries using a specific TK implant (based on combined femoral-tibial component brand name and fixation/congruency/mobile bearing insert/patella usage). Patient characteristics (age/body mass index [BMI]/sex/diagnosis osteoarthritis) were compared across registries for TK implants used in ≥ 2 registries ≥ 100 times.

RESULTS

813 different TK implants (577,351 procedures) were used across the 4 registries, of which 53 TK implants (7%) were used in 1 registry (8,000 procedures). 760 different TK implants (569,351 procedures; 99%) were used in ≥ 2 registries of which 47 different TK implants (393,954 procedures; 68%) were used in ≥ 2 registries and ≥ 100 times. Statistically and clinically significant differences in age for the same TK implant across registries were observed for 29 TK implants (62%) and 3 TK implants (6%), respectively; for other characteristics these were for BMI 30 (64%) and 0 (0%) TK implants; for male proportion 23 (49%) and 17 (36%) TK implants; and for diagnosis of osteoarthritis 42 (89%) and 34 (72%) TK implants, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Most specific TK implants and TK procedures were used across multiple registries, but they were often used in patients with different characteristics. This has an impact on comparing implant performances between registries.

摘要

背景与目的

只有在多个登记处使用相同的全膝关节(TK)植入物,且用于特征相似的患者时,才有可能汇总各登记处TK植入物的性能数据。我们评估了特定TK植入物在以下方面的程度:(i)在多个登记处使用还是仅在单个登记处使用;(ii)各登记处患者特征的差异。

方法

纳入2020年1月至2021年12月在丹麦、荷兰、德国和意大利登记处植入的所有初次TK植入物。我们根据特定的TK植入物(基于股骨 - 胫骨组件组合品牌名称以及固定方式/匹配度/活动轴承插入物/髌骨使用情况)确定使用该植入物的登记处数量。对在≥2个登记处使用≥100次的TK植入物,比较各登记处的患者特征(年龄/体重指数[BMI]/性别/骨关节炎诊断)。

结果

4个登记处共使用了813种不同的TK植入物(577,351例手术),其中53种TK植入物(7%)仅在1个登记处使用(8,000例手术)。760种不同的TK植入物(569,351例手术;99%)在≥2个登记处使用,其中47种不同的TK植入物(393,954例手术;68%)在≥2个登记处且使用次数≥100次。对于相同的TK植入物,各登记处在年龄方面,分别观察到29种(62%)和3种(6%)存在统计学和临床显著差异;对于其他特征,BMI方面分别有30种(64%)和0种(0%)存在差异;男性比例方面分别有23种(49%)和17种(36%)存在差异;骨关节炎诊断方面分别有42种(89%)和34种(72%)存在差异。

结论

大多数特定的TK植入物和TK手术在多个登记处使用,但它们通常用于特征不同的患者。这对比较各登记处植入物的性能有影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d133/12006037/37751673c00d/ActaO-96-43476-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d133/12006037/37751673c00d/ActaO-96-43476-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d133/12006037/37751673c00d/ActaO-96-43476-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Pooling data for primary total knee implants across national registries: is the same implant used in multiple registries and for the same patient group? An observational study.汇总各国关节置换登记处的初次全膝关节置换植入物数据:多个登记处是否使用相同的植入物以及针对相同的患者群体?一项观察性研究。
Acta Orthop. 2025 Apr 17;96:339-347. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2025.43476.
2
Do Fixed or Mobile Bearing Implants Have Better Survivorship in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.固定或活动平台假体在膝关节单髁置换术中的生存率更高吗?来自澳大利亚矫形协会全国关节置换登记处的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jul 1;479(7):1548-1558. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001698.
3
Decreased Survival of Medial Pivot Designs Compared with Cruciate-retaining Designs in TKA Without Patellar Resurfacing.非髌骨表面置换的 TKA 中,与保留交叉韧带设计相比,内侧旋转平台设计的生存率降低。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jun;478(6):1207-1218. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001120.
4
Validating Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) Ratings Across 9 Orthopaedic Registries: Total Hip Implants with an ODEP Rating Perform Better Than Those without an ODEP Rating.验证骨科数据评估小组(ODEP)评分在 9 个骨科注册中心的表现:有 ODEP 评分的全髋关节假体比没有 ODEP 评分的表现更好。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024 Sep 4;106(17):1583-1593. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.00793. Epub 2024 May 31.
5
International comparative evaluation of knee replacement with fixed or mobile non-posterior-stabilized implants.固定或活动非后稳定型植入物膝关节置换术的国际比较评估
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Dec 17;96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):52-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00466.
6
Joint replacement surgery in Ghana (West Africa)-an observational study.加纳(西非)的关节置换手术——一项观察性研究。
Int Orthop. 2019 May;43(5):1041-1047. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04286-1. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
7
What Can We Learn From Surgeons Who Perform THA and TKA and Have the Lowest Revision Rates? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.从关节置换术返修率最低的髋关节置换术(THA)和膝关节置换术(TKA)医生身上,我们能学到什么?来自澳大利亚矫形协会全国关节置换登记处的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Mar 1;480(3):464-481. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002007.
8
No Increased Risk of Patella-Related Revisions When Comparing Ultra-Congruent versus Cruciate-Retaining Polyethylene Liners in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasties With an Unresurfaced Patella: An Australian Registry Study of 42,105 Knee Arthroplasties.在未进行髌骨表面置换的初次全膝关节置换术中,比较超匹配型与保留交叉韧带型聚乙烯衬垫时,髌骨相关翻修风险无增加:一项对42105例膝关节置换术的澳大利亚注册研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2025 May;40(5):1225-1231. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.005. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
9
Comparison of patient-reported outcomes based on implant brand in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.基于全膝关节置换术的植入物品牌的患者报告结局比较:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Jul;101-B(7_Supple_C):48-54. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B7.BJJ-2018-1382.R1.
10
Outcome of prosthesis matched and unmatched patella components in primary and revision total knee replacement.初次和翻修全膝关节置换中假体匹配与不匹配髌骨组件的结果
Knee. 2017 Oct;24(5):1227-1232. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Aug 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Incidence of constrained condylar and hinged knee implants and mid- to long-term survivorship: a register-based study from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA).受限髁和铰链式膝关节植入物的发生率及中长期生存率:来自北欧关节置换登记协会(NARA)的一项基于登记处的研究。
Acta Orthop. 2025 Feb 6;96:142-150. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2025.42999.
2
Safety notices and registry outlier data measure different aspects of safety and performance of total knee implants: a comparative study of safety notices and register outliers.安全警示和注册异常数据衡量全膝关节植入物的安全性和性能的不同方面:安全警示和注册异常的比较研究。
Acta Orthop. 2024 Nov 25;95:667-676. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.42361.
3
The burden of knee osteoarthritis worldwide, regionally, and nationally from 1990 to 2019, along with an analysis of cross-national inequalities.
全球、地区和国家层面 1990 年至 2019 年的膝关节骨关节炎负担,以及对国家间不平等的分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Jun;144(6):2731-2743. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05250-4. Epub 2024 May 18.
4
Increased risk of aseptic loosening for posterior stabilized compared with posterior cruciate-retaining uncemented total knee replacements: a cohort study of 13,667 knees from the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry.与保留后交叉韧带的非骨水泥固定型全膝关节置换相比,后稳定型全膝关节置换的无菌性松动风险增加:来自荷兰关节置换登记处的 13667 例膝关节的队列研究。
Acta Orthop. 2023 Dec 13;94:600-606. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.33283.
5
Evaluation of painful total knee arthroplasty: an approach based on common etiologies for total knee arthroplasty revision.评价全膝关节置换术后疼痛:基于全膝关节翻修常见病因的处理方法。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2024 Mar;108(1):11-20. doi: 10.1007/s12306-023-00800-2. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
6
The difference between statistical significance and clinical relevance. The case of minimal important change, non-inferiority trials, and smallest worthwhile effect.统计学意义与临床相关性的区别。以最小有意义变化、非劣效性试验和最小有意义效应为例。
Injury. 2023 Oct;54 Suppl 5:110764. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.04.051.
7
Quality and Utility of European Cardiovascular and Orthopaedic Registries for the Regulatory Evaluation of Medical Device Safety and Performance Across the Implant Lifecycle: A Systematic Review.欧洲心血管和骨科器械注册研究在医疗器械全生命周期监管评价中的安全性和性能的质量和实用性:一项系统评价。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7648. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7648. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
8
Body Mass Index and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Cause for Revision Vary by Underweight or Obese Status?体重指数与全膝关节置换翻修术:翻修原因是否因体重过轻或肥胖状态而异?
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Dec;38(12):2504-2509.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.06.019. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
9
[10 Years of the German Arthroplasty Registry-EPRD: what has been achieved?].[德国关节置换登记处 - EPRD的十年:取得了哪些成果?]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2023 Jun;52(6):463-471. doi: 10.1007/s00132-023-04385-3. Epub 2023 May 23.
10
Mid-term survivorship of primary total knee arthroplasty with a specific implant.使用特定植入物的初次全膝关节置换术的中期生存率
Bone Joint J. 2023 Mar 1;105-B(3):277-283. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B3.BJJ-2022-0616.R1.