• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情隔离与康复场所评估:系统创新的经验教训

COVID-19 isolation and recovery sites evaluation: Lessons learned for systems innovation.

作者信息

Firestone Michelle, Khoee Kimia, Kolla Gillian, O'Campo Patricia, Nisenbaum Rosane, Holness D Linn, Schlosser Lisa, Beder Michaela, Steer Lorie, Pariseau Terry, Bayoumi Ahmed M

机构信息

MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 2025 Apr 25. doi: 10.17269/s41997-025-01031-7.

DOI:10.17269/s41997-025-01031-7
PMID:40279072
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The City of Toronto opened COVID-19 Isolation and Recovery Sites (CIRS) in 2020 in response to the need for supported isolation spaces for people experiencing homelessness. As a team of academic researchers and community partners, we assessed how lessons from the CIRS can inform post-pandemic policies for people experiencing homelessness. We focused on identifying models and systems of care for understanding existing services and integration, identifying innovations, and imagining how care can be transformed to be more caring and just.

METHODS

We conducted 43 key informant interviews with clinicians, peer and harm reduction workers, executive leaders, operational leaders, and people who worked for funding or decision-making organizations. Data were coded and analyzed using deductive content analysis.

RESULTS

The CIRS presented a new service model that moved away from being overly medicalized towards having a community orientation, which involved greater integration of services for people experiencing homelessness, transparent decision-making, and open communication. Key to this approach were clinical case management, harm reduction services, strong support of peer workers, and adequate and consistent funding. Future models will need to address power imbalances and hierarchies through formal agreements and processes as well as establishing collaborative cultures.

CONCLUSION

The CIRS offer an important opportunity to rethink services offered within shelter settings. Such change will require a strong vision, sufficient funding, political will, and accountability among all stakeholders. The COVID-19 pandemic offers decision makers an opportunity to consider system-level transformation by looking at largely successful elements of the crisis responses.

摘要

目的

多伦多市于2020年开设了新冠疫情隔离与康复场所(CIRS),以满足无家可归者对支持性隔离空间的需求。作为一个由学术研究人员和社区合作伙伴组成的团队,我们评估了CIRS的经验教训如何为无家可归者的疫情后政策提供参考。我们专注于确定护理模式和系统,以了解现有服务与整合情况、识别创新之处,并设想如何将护理转变为更具关怀性和公正性。

方法

我们对临床医生、同伴及减少伤害工作者、行政领导、运营领导以及为资助或决策组织工作的人员进行了43次关键信息访谈。使用演绎性内容分析法对数据进行编码和分析。

结果

CIRS呈现了一种新的服务模式,从过度医疗化转向以社区为导向,这涉及为无家可归者提供更综合的服务、透明的决策制定以及开放的沟通。这种方法的关键在于临床病例管理、减少伤害服务、同伴工作者的有力支持以及充足且持续的资金。未来的模式需要通过正式协议和流程以及建立协作文化来解决权力不平衡和等级制度问题。

结论

CIRS提供了一个重新思考庇护场所内所提供服务的重要契机。这种变革将需要坚定的愿景、充足的资金、政治意愿以及所有利益相关者的问责制。新冠疫情为决策者提供了一个机会,通过审视危机应对中大体上成功的要素来考虑系统层面的变革。

相似文献

1
COVID-19 isolation and recovery sites evaluation: Lessons learned for systems innovation.新冠疫情隔离与康复场所评估:系统创新的经验教训
Can J Public Health. 2025 Apr 25. doi: 10.17269/s41997-025-01031-7.
2
Substance use care innovations during COVID-19: barriers and facilitators to the provision of safer supply at a toronto COVID-19 isolation and recovery site.COVID-19 期间的物质使用护理创新:在多伦多 COVID-19 隔离和康复点提供更安全供应的障碍和促进因素。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Jan 20;21(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-00935-w.
3
Intersecting factors of disadvantage and discrimination and their effect on daily life during the coronavirus pandemic: the CICADA-ME mixed-methods study.新冠疫情期间不利因素与歧视的交叉影响及其对日常生活的作用:CICADA-ME混合方法研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/KYTF4381.
4
A peer-delivered intervention to reduce harm and improve the well-being of homeless people with problem substance use: the SHARPS feasibility mixed-methods study.一种由同伴提供的干预措施,旨在减少有问题物质使用的无家可归者的伤害并改善其福祉:SHARPS 可行性混合方法研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Feb;26(14):1-128. doi: 10.3310/WVVL4786.
5
"You know, we can change the services to suit the circumstances of what is happening in the world": a rapid case study of the COVID-19 response across city centre homelessness and health services in Edinburgh, Scotland.“你知道,我们可以根据世界上正在发生的情况来改变服务”:苏格兰爱丁堡市中心无家可归和健康服务应对 COVID-19 的快速案例研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2021 Jun 12;18(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12954-021-00508-1.
6
"COVID knocked me straight into the dirt": perspectives from people experiencing homelessness on the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic."COVID 让我直接陷入困境":无家可归者对 COVID-19 大流行影响的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 12;22(1):1327. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13748-y.
7
"We have to be uncomfortable and creative": Reflections on the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on overdose prevention, harm reduction & homelessness advocacy in Philadelphia.“我们必须身处不适之境并发挥创造力”:关于新冠疫情对费城过量用药预防、减少伤害及无家可归者权益倡导工作影响的思考
SSM Qual Res Health. 2021 Dec;1:100013. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2021.100013. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
8
Homelessness during COVID-19: challenges, responses, and lessons learned from homeless service providers in Tippecanoe County, Indiana.在 COVID-19 期间无家可归:印第安纳州蒂珀卡努县无家可归服务提供者面临的挑战、应对措施和经验教训。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 10;21(1):1657. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11687-8.
9
Challenges faced by people experiencing homelessness and their providers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,无家可归者及其提供者所面临的挑战:一项定性研究。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Jul 19;10(3):E685-E691. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210334. Print 2022 Jul-Sep.
10
Exploring COVID-19 vaccine uptake, confidence and hesitancy among people experiencing homelessness in Toronto, Canada: protocol for the qualitative study.探索加拿大多伦多无家可归者对 COVID-19 疫苗的接种、信心和犹豫:定性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 17;12(8):e064225. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064225.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Shelter-in-Place Hotels With Health Services Use Among People Experiencing Homelessness During the COVID-19 Pandemic.避难所酒店与 COVID-19 大流行期间无家可归者健康服务使用的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2223891. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.23891.
2
The impact of an integrated safer use space and safer supply program on non-fatal overdose among emergency shelter residents during a COVID-19 outbreak: a case study.COVID-19疫情期间综合安全使用空间与安全供应计划对紧急避难所居民非致命性药物过量的影响:一项案例研究
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Mar 21;19(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00614-8.
3
Finding stability amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: The impact of emergency temporary housing for people who use drugs.
在新冠疫情期间寻求稳定:紧急临时住房对吸毒者的影响。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2022 Jan;41(1):7-8. doi: 10.1111/dar.13335. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
4
Assessment of a Hotel-Based COVID-19 Isolation and Quarantine Strategy for Persons Experiencing Homelessness.评估基于酒店的 COVID-19 隔离和检疫策略,以帮助无家可归者。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e210490. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0490.
5
The Spectrum of Inductive and Deductive Research Approaches Using Quantitative and Qualitative Data.使用定量和定性数据的归纳与演绎研究方法的范围
Acad Med. 2020 Jul;95(7):1122. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003101.
6
Peer worker involvement in low-threshold supervised consumption facilities in the context of an overdose epidemic in Vancouver, Canada.在加拿大温哥华的药物过量流行背景下,同伴工作人员参与低门槛监督消费设施。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Mar;225:60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.014. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
7
Reducing Health Inequities Through Intersectoral Action: Balancing Equity in Health With Equity for Other Social Goods.通过跨部门行动减少健康不平等:在健康公平与其他社会公益公平之间取得平衡。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Jan 1;8(1):1-3. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.103.
8
What can "thematic analysis" offer health and wellbeing researchers?“主题分析”能为健康与幸福领域的研究者提供什么?
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2014 Oct 16;9:26152. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v9.26152. eCollection 2014.
9
Developmental evaluation: building innovations in complex environments.发展性评估:在复杂环境中构建创新
Health Promot Pract. 2011 Sep;12(5):645-50. doi: 10.1177/1524839911412596. Epub 2011 Aug 22.