Le Flora, Mattern Viola, Johansson Peter J, Hettiarachchi Pasan, Ebner-Priemer Ulrich, Wiley Joshua F, Dumuid Dorothea, Giurgiu Marco
School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Engler-Bunte-Ring 15, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 25;15(1):14455. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99266-4.
The daily association between 24-hour physical behavior compositions (moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), light physical activity (LPA), standing, sedentary, and sleep) and psychological outcomes-such as momentary affective state assessments and working memory-remains understudied. We investigated whether the daily 24-hour compositions, particularly MVPA and SB considering the remaining behaviors, are associated with affective states and working memory. We conducted an ambulatory assessment study with 199 university employees. Physical behaviors were measured continuously via thigh-worn accelerometers throughout the day. Affective states (i.e., valence, energetic arousal, and calmness) and working memory performance (i.e., numeric updating task) were captured up to six times a day via electronic diaries and tasks on a smartphone. We conducted Bayesian multilevel compositional data analysis to analyze within-person, and between-person associations of 24-hour physical behavior composition with affective states, and working memory. Aggregated same-day outcomes were used for main analyses to capture concurrent associations, and next-day outcomes were used for exploratory analyses to capture prospective associations. Concurrent analyses showed that higher moderate-to-vigorous physical activity relative to the remaining physical behaviors was associated with 2.49 [95%CI 1.00, 4.06] higher valence and 3.65 [95%CI 2.11, 5.28] higher energetic arousal (but not calmness) ratings at the within-person, but not at the between-person level. Sedentary behavior relative to the remaining physical behaviors was not associated with any affective states. Spending more time in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, followed by light physical activity, and standing, each at the expense of the other behaviors was associated with higher affective state ratings on the same day (between-person: ≥1.29 [0.19, 2.51] higher valence, 1.23 [0.04, 2.40] higher calmness; within-person: ≥0.62 [0.04, 1.22] higher valence, ≥ 1.10 [0.63, 1.58] higher energetic arousal, ≥ 0.95 [0.18, 1.74] higher calmness). The 24-hour physical behavior composition was not associated with working memory. Findings underline the importance of the 24-hour composition of physical behavior for mental health, by demonstrating significant concurrent associations with affective states. Even small reallocations of behaviors may positively influence affective states, providing valuable insights for the development of future interventions.
24小时身体行为构成(中等到剧烈身体活动(MVPA)、轻度身体活动(LPA)、站立、久坐和睡眠)与心理结果(如瞬间情感状态评估和工作记忆)之间的日常关联仍未得到充分研究。我们调查了每日24小时的行为构成,特别是考虑到其他行为的MVPA和久坐行为(SB),是否与情感状态和工作记忆有关。我们对199名大学员工进行了一项动态评估研究。通过佩戴在大腿上的加速度计全天连续测量身体行为。情感状态(即效价、精力唤醒和平静度)和工作记忆表现(即数字更新任务)通过电子日记和智能手机上的任务每天最多记录6次。我们进行了贝叶斯多级成分数据分析,以分析24小时身体行为构成与情感状态和工作记忆在个体内部和个体之间的关联。汇总的同一天结果用于主要分析以捕捉同时发生的关联,第二天的结果用于探索性分析以捕捉前瞻性关联。同时分析表明,相对于其他身体行为,较高的中等到剧烈身体活动与个体内部效价高2.49 [95%可信区间1.00, 4.06]和精力唤醒高3.65 [95%可信区间2.11, 5.28](但不是平静度)相关,但在个体间水平上不相关。相对于其他身体行为,久坐行为与任何情感状态均无关联。在中等到剧烈身体活动、轻度身体活动和站立中花费更多时间,且每种行为都以牺牲其他行为为代价,与同一天更高的情感状态评分相关(个体间:效价高≥1.29 [0.19, 2.51],平静度高1.23 [0.04, 2.40];个体内部:效价高≥0.62 [0.04, 1.22],精力唤醒高≥1.10 [0.63, 1.58],平静度高≥0.95 [0.18, 1.74])。24小时身体行为构成与工作记忆无关。研究结果通过证明与情感状态存在显著的同时发生关联,强调了24小时身体行为构成对心理健康的重要性。即使是行为的微小重新分配也可能对情感状态产生积极影响,为未来干预措施的制定提供了有价值的见解。