Lightbody C Elizabeth, Gordon Clare, Burton Christopher, Davidson Catherine, Jenkinson Damian, Patel Aasima Saeed, Petrie Freja Jo, Rouncefield-Swales Alison, Sprigg Nikola, Stewart Katherine, Suleman Mehrunisha, Watkins Caroline Leigh, Thetford Clare
School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.
Dean of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 8;13(8):848. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13080848.
Stroke has high mortality. Challenges in providing end-of-life care include uncertainty among healthcare professionals about when to start care. While generic tools and guidelines exist, which outline components of quality end-of life care, they may not fully address stroke's unpredictable trajectories, complicating care planning. To enhance understanding of end-of-life care post-stroke. We undertook an explanatory sequential mixed methods approach, including a cross-sectional survey and semi-structured interviews. All 286 United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) hospitals providing inpatient stroke care were approached for participation in an on-line cross-sectional survey. The survey of healthcare professionals from UK stroke units was used to map current stroke end-of-life care and models of care. Fourteen staff who completed the survey and agreed to a future interview were purposively selected. The semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals involved in delivering end-of-life care post-stroke were conducted and interpreted using the Theoretical Domains Framework. We aimed to enhance our understanding of the experiences, expectations, challenges and barriers in providing end-of-life care post-stroke, including effective clinical decision-making. Across 108 responding survey sites, 317 responses were received. Results showed a lack of structured tools and approaches, an absence of stroke-specific guidance and variable delivery of end-of-life care post-stroke. Thirteen staff (nurses, occupational therapists, medical stroke consultants, and a speech and language therapist) agreed to be interviewed. The data provided a fuller understanding of the context within which end-of-life care post-stroke is delivered. The varied challenges faced include: uncertain prognosis, complex decision-making process, varying skill levels, staffing levels, the hospital environment, emotional strain on both families and staff, inequitable access to specialist palliative care, and difficulties associated with different models of care (stroke service structures and cultural context). Provision of end-of-life care post-stroke is complex, challenging, uncertain, and inconsistent. There is limited evidence or guidance to support healthcare professionals. There is a need for implementation support, which includes education, to better enable quality and more consistent end-of-life care post-stroke. Further research is required to assess interventions that can support end-of-life care post-stroke to aid clinicians in providing quality palliative care for stroke patients.
中风的死亡率很高。提供临终关怀面临的挑战包括医疗保健专业人员对于何时开始护理存在不确定性。虽然存在通用工具和指南,概述了优质临终关怀的组成部分,但它们可能无法完全应对中风不可预测的病程,使护理计划变得复杂。为了增进对中风后临终关怀的理解,我们采用了一种解释性序列混合方法,包括横断面调查和半结构化访谈。我们联系了提供住院中风护理的所有286家英国国民健康服务(NHS)医院,邀请其参与在线横断面调查。对来自英国中风单元的医疗保健专业人员进行的调查用于描绘当前中风临终关怀情况及护理模式。有目的地挑选了14名完成调查并同意未来接受访谈的工作人员。对参与中风后临终关怀工作的医疗保健专业人员进行了半结构化访谈,并使用理论领域框架进行解读。我们旨在增进对中风后提供临终关怀过程中的经历、期望、挑战和障碍的理解,包括有效的临床决策。在108个回复调查的地点,共收到317份回复。结果显示缺乏结构化工具和方法,缺乏中风特异性指导,中风后临终关怀的提供情况参差不齐。13名工作人员(护士、职业治疗师、中风医学顾问和一名言语治疗师)同意接受访谈。这些数据使我们对中风后临终关怀的实施背景有了更全面的了解。面临的各种挑战包括:预后不确定、决策过程复杂、技能水平各异、人员配备水平、医院环境、家庭和工作人员的情感压力、获得专科姑息治疗的机会不平等,以及与不同护理模式(中风服务结构和文化背景)相关的困难。中风后临终关怀的提供复杂、具有挑战性、不确定且不一致。支持医疗保健专业人员的证据和指导有限。需要实施支持,包括教育,以更好地实现中风后优质且更一致的临终关怀。需要进一步研究以评估能够支持中风后临终关怀的干预措施,帮助临床医生为中风患者提供优质的姑息治疗。