• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

密室逃脱中的社会动态解剖。

The anatomy of social dynamics in escape rooms.

机构信息

Department of Network and Data Science, Central European University, Budapest, 1051, Hungary.

Laboratory for Networks, Innovation and Technology, Corvinus University, Budapest, 1093, Hungary.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 22;12(1):10498. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13929-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-13929-0
PMID:35732634
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9217954/
Abstract

From sport and science production to everyday life, higher-level pursuits demand collaboration. Despite an increase in the number of data-driven studies on human behavior, the social dynamics of collaborative problem solving are still largely unexplored with network science and other computational and quantitative tools. Here we introduce escape rooms as a non-interventional and minimally biased social laboratory, which allows us to capture at a high resolution real-time communications in small project teams. Our analysis portrays a nuanced picture of different dimensions of social dynamics. We reveal how socio-demographic characteristics impact problem solving and the importance of prior relationships for enhanced interactions. We extract key conversation rules from motif analysis and discuss turn-usurping gendered behavior, a phenomenon particularly strong in male-dominated teams. We investigate the temporal evolution of signed and group interactions, finding that a minimum level of tense communication might be beneficial for collective problem solving, and revealing differences in the behavior of successful and failed teams. Our work unveils the innovative potential of escape rooms to study teams in their complexity, contributing to a deeper understanding of the micro-dynamics of collaborative team processes.

摘要

从运动和科学研究到日常生活,更高层次的追求都需要合作。尽管关于人类行为的基于数据的研究数量有所增加,但社交网络科学和其他计算及定量工具在很大程度上仍未探索协作问题解决的社会动态。在这里,我们将密室逃脱作为一种非干预性和最小偏见的社交实验室,它使我们能够以高分辨率实时捕获小项目团队中的沟通。我们的分析描绘了社会动态不同维度的细致画面。我们揭示了社会人口特征如何影响问题解决,以及先前关系对于增强互动的重要性。我们从模体分析中提取关键的对话规则,并讨论了特别强烈的男性主导团队中的夺话行为现象。我们研究了有符号和群体互动的时间演变,发现紧张沟通的最低水平可能有益于集体问题解决,并揭示了成功和失败团队行为的差异。我们的工作揭示了密室逃脱在研究团队复杂性方面的创新潜力,有助于更深入地了解协作团队过程的微观动态。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/581e/9217954/a6a86b42a2a7/41598_2022_13929_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/581e/9217954/50112d30afb1/41598_2022_13929_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/581e/9217954/a949a5e52bb6/41598_2022_13929_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/581e/9217954/998ab7fe33ac/41598_2022_13929_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/581e/9217954/f9a8f2d4fdd9/41598_2022_13929_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/581e/9217954/a6a86b42a2a7/41598_2022_13929_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/581e/9217954/50112d30afb1/41598_2022_13929_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/581e/9217954/a949a5e52bb6/41598_2022_13929_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/581e/9217954/998ab7fe33ac/41598_2022_13929_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/581e/9217954/f9a8f2d4fdd9/41598_2022_13929_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/581e/9217954/a6a86b42a2a7/41598_2022_13929_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The anatomy of social dynamics in escape rooms.密室逃脱中的社会动态解剖。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 22;12(1):10498. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13929-0.
2
Problem-Solving Phase Transitions During Team Collaboration.团队协作过程中的问题解决相变
Cogn Sci. 2018 Jan;42(1):129-167. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12482. Epub 2017 Feb 18.
3
Sports teams as superorganisms: implications of sociobiological models of behaviour for research and practice in team sports performance analysis.运动团队作为超个体:行为的社会生物学模型对团队运动表现分析研究和实践的启示。
Sports Med. 2012 Aug 1;42(8):633-42. doi: 10.2165/11632450-000000000-00000.
4
Collective Choice, Collaboration, and Communication.集体选择、协作与沟通。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2020 Jan 4;71:589-612. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103211. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
5
The Role of Hypernetworks as a Multilevel Methodology for Modelling and Understanding Dynamics of Team Sports Performance.超网络作为一种多层次方法在团队运动表现的建模和理解中的作用。
Sports Med. 2019 Sep;49(9):1337-1344. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01104-x.
6
Toward an understanding of macrocognition in teams: predicting processes in complex collaborative contexts.迈向团队宏观认知理解:预测复杂协作情境中的过程。
Hum Factors. 2010 Apr;52(2):203-24. doi: 10.1177/0018720810369807.
7
Inter-brain synchrony in teams predicts collective performance.团队间的大脑同步预测集体表现。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Jan 18;16(1-2):43-57. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa135.
8
Complex collaborative problem-solving processes in mission control.任务控制中的复杂协作式问题解决流程。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2014 Apr;85(4):456-61. doi: 10.3357/asem.3819.2014.
9
A multidisciplinary understanding of polarization.极化的多学科理解。
Am Psychol. 2019 Apr;74(3):301-314. doi: 10.1037/amp0000450.
10
Multiscale movement coordination dynamics in collaborative team problem solving.协作团队解决问题中的多尺度运动协调动力学。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Sep;79:143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
An online escape room as an icebreaker in interdisciplinary and international health care professions education: A pilot mixed-methods study of "UKA Escape".在线密室逃脱作为跨学科和国际医疗保健专业教育的破冰活动:“UKA逃脱”的混合方法试点研究
GMS J Med Educ. 2025 Apr 15;42(2):Doc18. doi: 10.3205/zma001742. eCollection 2025.
2
Development and testing of a Time-Critical Questioning protocol for eliciting information in time-sensitive contexts.一种用于在时间敏感情境中获取信息的时间关键提问协议的开发与测试。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 28;15(1):14855. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96792-z.
3
The dynamics of leadership and success in software development teams.

本文引用的文献

1
The gendered nature of authorship.作者身份的性别属性。
Sci Adv. 2021 Sep 3;7(36):eabe4639. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe4639. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
2
Fresh teams are associated with original and multidisciplinary research.新鲜的团队与原创和多学科研究有关。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Oct;5(10):1314-1322. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01084-x. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
3
Interaction data from the Copenhagen Networks Study.哥本哈根网络研究的交互数据。
软件开发团队中的领导力与成功动态
Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 27;16(1):3956. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59031-7.
4
Collective dynamics behind success.成功背后的集体动力。
Nat Commun. 2024 Dec 19;15(1):10701. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54612-4.
5
The Future of Emotion Regulation Research: Broadening Our Field of View.情绪调节研究的未来:拓宽我们的视野
Affect Sci. 2023 Oct 2;4(4):609-616. doi: 10.1007/s42761-023-00222-0. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Multistability, intermittency, and hybrid transitions in social contagion models on hypergraphs.超图上社交传播模型中的多稳定性、间歇性和混合转变。
Nat Commun. 2023 Mar 13;14(1):1375. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37118-3.
Sci Data. 2019 Dec 11;6(1):315. doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0325-x.
4
Clustering knowledge and dispersing abilities enhances collective problem solving in a network.聚类知识和分散能力可增强网络中的集体问题解决能力。
Nat Commun. 2019 Nov 13;10(1):5146. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12650-3.
5
Efficient team structures in an open-ended cooperative creativity experiment.开放式合作创意实验中的高效团队结构。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 29;116(44):22088-22093. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1909827116. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
6
Prior shared success predicts victory in team competitions.先前的共同成功预测了团队竞赛的胜利。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Jan;3(1):74-81. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0460-y. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
7
Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology.大团队推动科学技术发展,小团队则颠覆之。
Nature. 2019 Feb;566(7744):378-382. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
8
Fundamental structures of dynamic social networks.动态社会网络的基本结构。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Sep 6;113(36):9977-82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602803113. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
9
Quantifying the impact of weak, strong, and super ties in scientific careers.量化弱关系、强关系和超级关系在科学职业生涯中的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 25;112(34):E4671-80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501444112. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
10
The strength of the strongest ties in collaborative problem solving.协作解决问题中最强联系的强度。
Sci Rep. 2014 Jun 20;4:5277. doi: 10.1038/srep05277.