• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从大众市场设备收集的眼动参数在文本理解评估中的应用。

An Application of Eye Movement Parameters Collected from Mass Market Devices for the Estimation of a Text Comprehension.

作者信息

Babanova Ksenia, Revazov Arsen, Chernozatonskiy Konstantin, Pikunov Andrey, Anisimov Victor

机构信息

Oken Technologies, Inc., USA.

Lomonosov MSU, Faculty of Biology, Russia.

出版信息

J Eye Mov Res. 2023 Mar 20;16(2). doi: 10.16910/jemr.16.2.1. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.16910/jemr.16.2.1
PMID:38020585
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10659816/
Abstract

The growing interest in evaluating the reader's comprehension leads to the search for new methods that allow such estimation in real-time (or pseudo-real-time). This can be used for more effective educational processes and to adopt textual content for various purposes. The present study used the Oken Reader eye-tracking application (60 Hz) for mass-market devices to assess reading comprehension processes. Twenty-three (23) respondents aged between 19 and 31 (mean = 24. 5, SE = 1. 4, 65% female) participated in the study. The mean, mu, and sigma parameters differed significantly depending on the level of text comprehension. This result indicates the possibility of using mass-market devices with eye-tracking technology to assess comprehension in reading. Furthermore, the study's results confirm the possibility of searching the correlations between physiological indicators such as eye movements and comprehension.

摘要

对评估读者阅读理解能力的兴趣日益浓厚,促使人们寻找能够实时(或准实时)进行此类评估的新方法。这可用于更有效的教育过程,并将文本内容用于各种目的。本研究使用面向大众市场设备的奥肯阅读器眼动追踪应用程序(60赫兹)来评估阅读理解过程。23名年龄在19岁至31岁之间(平均年龄 = 24.5岁,标准误 = 1.4,65%为女性)的受访者参与了该研究。均值、μ和σ参数因文本理解水平的不同而存在显著差异。这一结果表明,使用配备眼动追踪技术的大众市场设备来评估阅读中的理解能力是有可能的。此外,该研究结果证实了探寻诸如眼动等生理指标与理解能力之间相关性的可能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de13/10659816/f99619cbf6d1/jemr-16-02-a-figure-04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de13/10659816/31a7681afea1/jemr-16-02-a-figure-01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de13/10659816/d713f316cfe2/jemr-16-02-a-figure-02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de13/10659816/9fb8d8ab720b/jemr-16-02-a-figure-03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de13/10659816/f99619cbf6d1/jemr-16-02-a-figure-04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de13/10659816/31a7681afea1/jemr-16-02-a-figure-01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de13/10659816/d713f316cfe2/jemr-16-02-a-figure-02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de13/10659816/9fb8d8ab720b/jemr-16-02-a-figure-03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de13/10659816/f99619cbf6d1/jemr-16-02-a-figure-04.jpg

相似文献

1
An Application of Eye Movement Parameters Collected from Mass Market Devices for the Estimation of a Text Comprehension.从大众市场设备收集的眼动参数在文本理解评估中的应用。
J Eye Mov Res. 2023 Mar 20;16(2). doi: 10.16910/jemr.16.2.1. eCollection 2023.
2
Tracking your emotions: An eye-tracking study on reader's engagement with perspective during text comprehension.追踪情绪:眼动追踪研究读者在文本理解过程中对观点的参与度。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Jun;73(6):929-940. doi: 10.1177/1747021820905561. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
3
What Eye Movements Reveal About Later Comprehension of Long Connected Texts.眼动揭示了对长连接文本的后续理解。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Oct;44(10):e12905. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12905.
4
Effects of seductive details evidenced by gaze duration.目光注视时间所体现的诱惑细节的影响。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2014 Mar;109:131-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
5
Estimation of reading subjective understanding based on eye gaze analysis.基于眼动分析的阅读主观理解估计。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 25;13(10):e0206213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206213. eCollection 2018.
6
Eye Fixation Behaviors and Processing Time of People With Aphasia and Neurotypical Adults When Reading Narratives With and Without Text-to-Speech Support.失语症患者和神经典型成年人在有和没有文本转语音支持的情况下阅读叙事文时的眼动注视行为和处理时间。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Jan 12;66(1):276-295. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00298. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
7
Gaze Information Channel in Cognitive Comprehension of Poster Reading.海报阅读认知理解中的注视信息通道
Entropy (Basel). 2019 Apr 28;21(5):444. doi: 10.3390/e21050444.
8
Using eye movements to evaluate the cognitive processes involved in text comprehension.利用眼动来评估文本理解中涉及的认知过程。
J Vis Exp. 2014 Jan 10(83):e50780. doi: 10.3791/50780.
9
Does mood influence text processing and comprehension? Evidence from an eye-movement study.情绪会影响文本处理和理解吗?一项眼动研究的证据。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2015 Sep;85(3):387-406. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12080. Epub 2015 May 23.
10
When your mind skips what your eyes fixate: How forced fixations lead to comprehension illusions in reading.当你的思维跳过眼睛注视的内容时:强制注视如何导致阅读中的理解错觉。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1884-1890. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1356-y.

引用本文的文献

1
How Do Stress Situations Affect Higher-Level Text Processing in L1 and L2 Readers? An Eye-Tracking Study.压力情境如何影响母语和第二语言读者的高级文本处理?一项眼动追踪研究。
J Eye Mov Res. 2025 Mar 24;18(2):7. doi: 10.3390/jemr18020007. eCollection 2025 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Selective attention to question-relevant text information precedes high-quality summaries: Evidence from eye movements.对与问题相关的文本信息的选择性关注先于高质量的总结:来自眼动的证据。
J Eye Mov Res. 2019 May 30;12(1). doi: 10.16910/jemr.12.1.6.
2
Contextual constraint and lexical competition: Revisiting biased misperception during reading.语境约束与词汇竞争:重新审视阅读中的有偏差的感知错误。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Jan;47(1):81-102. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000878. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
3
Not all fixations are created equal: The benefits of using ex-Gaussian modeling of fixation durations.
并非所有注视点都是相同的:使用注视持续时间的超伽马分布模型的好处。
J Vis. 2020 Oct 1;20(10):9. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.10.9.
4
Literacy skill and intra-individual variability in eye-fixation durations during reading: Evidence from a diverse community-based adult sample.阅读过程中的文字阅读能力与眼跳持续时间的个体内变异性:来自多样化的基于社区的成年样本的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Nov;73(11):1841-1861. doi: 10.1177/1747021820935457. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
5
Context facilitation in text reading: A study of children's eye movements.文本阅读中的语境促进作用:一项针对儿童眼动的研究。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Sep;46(9):1701-1713. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000834. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
6
Eye Movements and Comprehension Are Important to Reading.眼球运动与阅读理解对阅读很重要。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Oct;23(10):811-812. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
7
Predicting eye-movement characteristics across multiple tasks from working memory and executive control.从工作记忆和执行控制预测多项任务中的眼动特征。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Jul;46(5):826-839. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0798-4.
8
Comprehension in Proficient Readers: The Nature of Individual Variation.熟练读者的阅读理解:个体差异的本质
J Mem Lang. 2017 Dec;97:135-153. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
9
Neural correlates of individual differences in fixation duration during natural reading.自然阅读过程中注视持续时间个体差异的神经关联
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 May 16:1-33. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1329322.
10
The word frequency effect during sentence reading: A linear or nonlinear effect of log frequency?句子阅读过程中的词频效应:对数频率的线性还是非线性效应?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016 Oct 20:1-11. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1240813.