• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体组块能力预测二语加工的高效性或浅度性:来自关系从句中多词单位的眼动追踪证据

Individual Chunking Ability Predicts Efficient or Shallow L2 Processing: Eye-Tracking Evidence From Multiword Units in Relative Clauses.

作者信息

Pulido Manuel F

机构信息

Department of Spanish, Italian and Portuguese, Center for Language Science, Penn State University, University Park, PA, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 15;11:607621. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.607621. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.607621
PMID:33519614
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7844092/
Abstract

Behavioral studies on language processing rely on the eye-mind assumption, which states that the time spent looking at text is an index of the time spent processing it. In most cases, relatively shorter reading times are interpreted as evidence of greater processing efficiency. However, previous evidence from L2 research indicates that non-native participants who present fast reading times are not always more efficient readers, but rather shallow parsers. Because earlier studies did not identify a reliable predictor of variability in L2 processing, such uncertainty around the interpretation of reading times introduces a potential confound that undermines the credibility and the conclusions of online measures of processing. The present study proposes that a recently developed modulator of online processing efficiency, namely, chunking ability, may account for the observed variability in L2 online reading performance. L1 English - L2 Spanish learners' eye movements were analyzed during natural reading. Chunking ability was predictive of overall reading speed. Target relative clauses contained L2 Verb-Noun multiword units, which were manipulated with regards to their L1-L2 congruency. The results indicated that processing of the L1-L2 incongruent units was modulated by an interaction of L2 chunking ability and level of knowledge of multiword units. Critically, the data revealed an inverse U-shaped pattern, with faster reading times in both learners with the highest and the lowest chunking ability scores, suggesting fast integration in the former, and lack of integration in the latter. Additionally, the presence of significant differences between conditions was correlated with individual chunking ability. The findings point at chunking ability as a significant modulator of general L2 processing efficiency, and of cross-language differences in particular, and add clarity to the interpretation of variability in the online reading performance of non-native speakers.

摘要

关于语言处理的行为研究依赖于眼脑假设,该假设认为注视文本的时间是处理文本时间的一个指标。在大多数情况下,相对较短的阅读时间被解释为更高处理效率的证据。然而,以往二语研究的证据表明,阅读速度快的非母语参与者并不总是阅读效率更高,而是浅层次解析者。由于早期研究未能确定二语处理变异性的可靠预测指标,阅读时间解释的这种不确定性引入了一个潜在的混淆因素,削弱了在线处理测量的可信度和结论。本研究提出,一种最近开发的在线处理效率调节因素,即组块能力,可能解释二语在线阅读表现中观察到的变异性。在自然阅读过程中分析了以英语为母语、以西班牙语为二语的学习者的眼动情况。组块能力可预测总体阅读速度。目标关系从句包含二语动词-名词多词单元,根据其一语-二语一致性进行了操控。结果表明,一语-二语不一致单元的处理受到二语组块能力和多词单元知识水平相互作用的调节。关键的是,数据呈现出倒U形模式,组块能力得分最高和最低的学习者阅读时间都更快,这表明前者是快速整合,后者是缺乏整合。此外,不同条件之间存在的显著差异与个体组块能力相关。这些发现表明组块能力是二语总体处理效率的一个重要调节因素,尤其是跨语言差异的调节因素,并为解释非母语者在线阅读表现的变异性增添了清晰度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e2d/7844092/2856c4bb28c0/fpsyg-11-607621-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e2d/7844092/05846f084148/fpsyg-11-607621-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e2d/7844092/740b450f1c2b/fpsyg-11-607621-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e2d/7844092/c0dcfda28054/fpsyg-11-607621-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e2d/7844092/69a327608702/fpsyg-11-607621-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e2d/7844092/2856c4bb28c0/fpsyg-11-607621-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e2d/7844092/05846f084148/fpsyg-11-607621-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e2d/7844092/740b450f1c2b/fpsyg-11-607621-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e2d/7844092/c0dcfda28054/fpsyg-11-607621-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e2d/7844092/69a327608702/fpsyg-11-607621-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e2d/7844092/2856c4bb28c0/fpsyg-11-607621-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Individual Chunking Ability Predicts Efficient or Shallow L2 Processing: Eye-Tracking Evidence From Multiword Units in Relative Clauses.个体组块能力预测二语加工的高效性或浅度性:来自关系从句中多词单位的眼动追踪证据
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 15;11:607621. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.607621. eCollection 2020.
2
When Native Speakers Are Not "Native-Like:" Chunking Ability Predicts (Lack of) Sensitivity to Gender Agreement During Online Processing.当母语者不像母语者时:在在线处理过程中,词汇切分能力预测(缺乏)对性别一致的敏感性。
Cogn Sci. 2023 Oct;47(10):e13366. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13366.
3
Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers' Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced Reading.二语英语学习者句法加工中的任务敏感性:来自自定步速阅读中足够好加工的证据
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 11;11:575847. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575847. eCollection 2020.
4
Lexico-syntactic interactions during the processing of temporally ambiguous L2 relative clauses: An eye-tracking study with intermediate and advanced Portuguese-English bilinguals.二语时间歧义关系从句加工中的词汇句法互动:一项针对中级和高级葡英双语者的眼动研究。
PLoS One. 2019 May 29;14(5):e0216779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216779. eCollection 2019.
5
The missing-VP effect in readers of English as a second language.英语作为第二语言的读者中的缺失 VP 效应。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Aug;49(6):1204-1219. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01159-0. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
6
Processing Preference Toward Object-Extracted Relative Clauses in Mandarin Chinese by L1 and L2 Speakers: An Eye-Tracking Study.母语者和二语者对汉语中宾语提取关系从句的加工偏好:一项眼动研究
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 21;7:4. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00004. eCollection 2016.
7
L2 Learners Do Not Ignore Verb's Subcategorization Information in Real-Time Syntactic Processing.二语学习者在实时句法处理中不会忽略动词的次范畴化信息。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 20;12:689137. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689137. eCollection 2021.
8
Implicit Statistical Learning in L2 Sentence Processing: Individual Cognitive Differences.二语句子加工中的内隐统计学习:个体认知差异。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2023 Aug;52(4):1037-1060. doi: 10.1007/s10936-023-09957-0. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
9
CELER: A 365-Participant Corpus of Eye Movements in L1 and L2 English Reading.CELER:一个包含365名参与者的第一语言和第二语言英语阅读眼动语料库。
Open Mind (Camb). 2022 Jul 1;6:41-50. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00054. eCollection 2022.
10
Does L2 Proficiency Impact L2-L1 Transfer While Reading L1 Collocations? Evidence From Behavioral and ERP Data.二语能力在阅读一语搭配时会影响二语向一语的迁移吗?来自行为和事件相关电位数据的证据。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 29;12:673761. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.673761. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
An Eye-Tracking Study on the Processing of L2 Collocations: The Effect of Congruency, Proficiency, and Transparency.一项关于二语搭配处理的眼动研究:同形、熟练程度和透明度的影响。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2024 Mar 16;53(2):30. doi: 10.1007/s10936-024-10064-x.
2
From eye movements to scanpath networks: A method for studying individual differences in expository text reading.从眼球运动到扫描路径网络:一种研究说明文阅读中个体差异的方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Feb;55(2):730-750. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01842-3. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
3
Research on bilingualism as discovery science.

本文引用的文献

1
Native language inhibition predicts more successful second language learning: Evidence of two ERP pathways during learning.母语抑制预测更成功的第二语言学习:学习过程中两种 ERP 通路的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Feb 12;152:107732. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107732. Epub 2020 Dec 19.
2
Passivizability of Idioms: Has the Wrong Tree Been Barked Up?成语的被动化:是否选错了研究对象?
Lang Speech. 2020 Jun;63(2):404-435. doi: 10.1177/0023830919847691. Epub 2019 May 19.
3
Cognitive Control Facilitates Attentional Disengagement during Second Language Comprehension.
双语能力作为发现科学的研究。
Brain Lang. 2021 Nov;222:105014. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2021.105014. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
认知控制有助于第二语言理解过程中的注意力脱离。
Brain Sci. 2019 Apr 27;9(5):95. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9050095.
4
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
5
The Importance of Reading Naturally: Evidence From Combined Recordings of Eye Movements and Electric Brain Potentials.自然阅读的重要性:来自眼动和脑电联合记录的证据
Cogn Sci. 2017 May;41 Suppl 6:1232-1263. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12384. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
6
Dynamic Engagement of Cognitive Control Modulates Recovery From Misinterpretation During Real-Time Language Processing.认知控制的动态参与调节实时语言处理过程中错误解读的恢复。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Apr;27(4):572-82. doi: 10.1177/0956797615625223. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
7
Are nonadjacent collocations processed faster?非相邻搭配的处理速度更快吗?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Oct;42(10):1632-1642. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000259. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
8
Good-enough linguistic representations and online cognitive equilibrium in language processing.语言处理中足够好的语言表征与在线认知平衡
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(5):1013-40. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1053951. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
9
The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language.现在或永不决口:语言的基本约束
Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Jan;39:e62. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1500031X. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
10
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.