• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种族文化程序公平性对少数族裔和多数族裔员工的组织认同和工作满意度的影响。

Ethnic-cultural procedural fairness effects on organizational identification and job satisfaction among minority and majority employees.

作者信息

Dierckx Kim, Depauw Hilde, Haesevoets Tessa, Valcke Barbara, Van Roey Thomas, Van de Putte Bart, De Cremer David, Els Crizelle, Van Hiel Alain

机构信息

Department of Developmental, Personality, and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Department of Sociology, Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 15;16:1445469. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1445469. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1445469
PMID:40302914
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12037562/
Abstract

In the present contribution, we examined the application of procedural fairness in the resolution of ethnic-cultural (EC) issues, which are issues relating to ethnic, cultural, and linguistic matters. We hypothesized that EC procedural fairness perceptions contribute to effective diversity management because they are positively related to job satisfaction among minority group employees. We further theorized that this relationship is mediated by organizational identification. What makes the present study particularly unique is that we employ a dual focus, by examining the perceptions of both minority and majority group members. Two field studies (total  = 2,059; 26.3% minority members) and a longitudinal field survey ( = 265 minority members) supported our predictions. In Study 1, we consistently found that minority employees' EC procedural fairness perceptions were positively associated with job satisfaction. Moreover, organizational identification fully mediated this relationship. Interestingly, similar positive responses to EC procedural fairness were observed among majority group employees. Study 2 sampled minority employees working in various countries and industrial sectors on two different measurement occasions. Multilevel mediation analyses provided further support for the mediating role of organizational identification. Finally, Study 3 sampled minority and majority group assembly line workers pertaining to various ethnically diverse teams. In line with Study 1, our multilevel analyses revealed that EC procedural fairness perceptions were related to enhanced job satisfaction (through organizational identification) among minority majority group employees. Taken together, the present results highlight that procedural fairness can be implemented to resolve ethnic-cultural issues in today's super-diverse organizations, and by doing so, they emphasize the potential of procedural fairness for organizational diversity management.

摘要

在本论文中,我们考察了程序公平在解决族裔文化(EC)问题中的应用,这些问题涉及种族、文化和语言事务。我们假设,对EC程序公平的认知有助于有效的多元化管理,因为它们与少数群体员工的工作满意度呈正相关。我们进一步提出理论,认为这种关系是由组织认同介导的。本研究的独特之处在于,我们采用了双重焦点,考察了少数群体和多数群体成员双方的认知。两项实地研究(共2059人;26.3%为少数群体成员)和一项纵向实地调查(265名少数群体成员)支持了我们的预测。在研究一当中我们始终发现,少数群体员工对EC程序公平的认知与工作满意度呈正相关。此外,组织认同完全介导了这种关系。有趣的是,多数群体员工对EC程序公平也有类似的积极反应。研究二在两个不同的测量时点对在不同国家和行业工作的少数群体员工进行了抽样。多层次中介分析进一步支持了组织认同的中介作用。最后,研究三对来自不同族裔多元化团队的少数群体和多数群体装配线工人进行了抽样。与研究一一致,我们的多层次分析显示,少数群体和多数群体员工对EC程序公平的认知与更高的工作满意度(通过组织认同)相关。综上所述,目前的研究结果表明,程序公平可以用来解决当今超级多元化组织中的族裔文化问题,通过这样做,它们强调了程序公平在组织多元化管理中的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/165c/12037562/ddaa0dc00a04/fpsyg-16-1445469-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/165c/12037562/85095e1393ab/fpsyg-16-1445469-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/165c/12037562/cc5eda5709d2/fpsyg-16-1445469-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/165c/12037562/ea570c813e22/fpsyg-16-1445469-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/165c/12037562/ddaa0dc00a04/fpsyg-16-1445469-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/165c/12037562/85095e1393ab/fpsyg-16-1445469-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/165c/12037562/cc5eda5709d2/fpsyg-16-1445469-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/165c/12037562/ea570c813e22/fpsyg-16-1445469-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/165c/12037562/ddaa0dc00a04/fpsyg-16-1445469-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Ethnic-cultural procedural fairness effects on organizational identification and job satisfaction among minority and majority employees.种族文化程序公平性对少数族裔和多数族裔员工的组织认同和工作满意度的影响。
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 15;16:1445469. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1445469. eCollection 2025.
2
Procedural fairness in ethnic-cultural decision-making: fostering social cohesion by incorporating minority and majority perspectives.族裔文化决策中的程序公平:通过纳入少数群体和多数群体的观点促进社会凝聚力。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 4;14:1025153. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1025153. eCollection 2023.
3
A Longitudinal Study of the Predictors of Perceived Procedural Justice in Australian University Staff.澳大利亚大学教职工程序公正感预测因素的纵向研究
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 25;7:1271. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01271. eCollection 2016.
4
When do procedural fairness and outcome fairness interact to influence employees' work attitudes and behaviors? The moderating effect of uncertainty.程序性公平和结果公平何时相互作用影响员工的工作态度和行为?不确定性的调节作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Mar;95(2):291-304. doi: 10.1037/a0017866.
5
Awareness of Stress-Reduction Interventions on Work Attitudes: The Impact of Tenure and Staff Group in Australian Universities.对减轻压力干预措施对工作态度的认知:任期和员工群体在澳大利亚大学中的影响。
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 18;7:1225. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01225. eCollection 2016.
6
The Influence of Multiculturalism and Assimilation on Work-Related Outcomes: Differences Between Ethnic Minority and Majority Groups of Workers.多元文化主义和同化对与工作相关结果的影响:少数族裔和多数族裔工人群体之间的差异。
Psychol Belg. 2019 Jul 16;59(1):246-268. doi: 10.5334/pb.472.
7
A trickle-down model of organizational justice: relating employees' and customers' perceptions of and reactions to fairness.组织公正的涓滴模型:员工与顾客对公平的认知及反应之关联
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Aug;86(4):594-604. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.594.
8
The effect of organizational structure on perceptions of procedural fairness.组织结构对程序公平感的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2000 Apr;85(2):294-304. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.294.
9
From Organizational Justice Perceptions to Turnover Intentions: The Mediating Effects of Burnout and Job Satisfaction.从组织公正认知到离职意图:职业倦怠和工作满意度的中介作用
Eur J Psychol. 2018 Aug 31;14(3):554-570. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v14i3.1490. eCollection 2018 Aug.
10
Life Satisfaction Among Chinese Aged Workers: Interplay of Organizational Justice, Workplace Emotions, and Subjective Age Perception.中国老年员工的生活满意度:组织公正、工作场所情绪与主观年龄认知的相互作用
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Jan 3;17:23-37. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S440168. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Leaders' induced justice perceptions as mediator of the relation between participative leadership behaviors and team learning.领导者的诱导性公正认知作为参与式领导行为与团队学习关系的中介变量。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 27;14:1244273. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1244273. eCollection 2023.
2
Procedural fairness in ethnic-cultural decision-making: fostering social cohesion by incorporating minority and majority perspectives.族裔文化决策中的程序公平:通过纳入少数群体和多数群体的观点促进社会凝聚力。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 4;14:1025153. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1025153. eCollection 2023.
3
Majority members misperceive even "win-win" diversity policies as unbeneficial to them.
大多数成员甚至将“双赢”的多元化政策误解为对他们没有好处。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Jun;122(6):1075-1097. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000372. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
4
Trajectories of Procedural and Interactional Justice as Predictors of Retirement among Swedish Workers: Differences between Three Groups of Retirees.程序公正和互动公正轨迹对瑞典工人退休的预测:三组退休人员的差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 15;18(12):6472. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126472.
5
Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams.引领多样性:迈向多元化团队功能型领导理论。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Oct;105(10):1101-1128. doi: 10.1037/apl0000482. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
6
Determining our destiny: Do restrictions to collective autonomy fuel collective action?决定我们的命运:对集体自主权的限制会激发集体行动吗?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Sep;119(3):600-632. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000217. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
7
Motivated cognition and fairness: Insights, integration, and creating a path forward.动机认知与公平:洞察、整合与前行之路
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Jun;102(6):867-889. doi: 10.1037/apl0000204. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
8
Two experimental tests of relational models of procedural justice: non-instrumental voice and authority group membership.程序性正义关系模型的两项实验测试:非工具性发言权和权威群体成员身份。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2013 Jun;52(2):361-76. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02083.x. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
9
Group-level self-definition and self-investment: a hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification.群体层面的自我定义与自我投入:内群体认同的层级(多成分)模型
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jul;95(1):144-65. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144.
10
Prejudice expectations moderate preconscious attention to cues that are threatening to social identity.偏见预期会调节前意识对威胁社会身份线索的关注。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Apr;17(4):332-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01707.x.