• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动机认知与公平:洞察、整合与前行之路

Motivated cognition and fairness: Insights, integration, and creating a path forward.

机构信息

Lazaridis School of Business & Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University.

Lee Kong Chian School of Business, Singapore Management University.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2017 Jun;102(6):867-889. doi: 10.1037/apl0000204. Epub 2017 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1037/apl0000204
PMID:28277729
Abstract

How do individuals form fairness perceptions? This question has been central to the fairness literature since its inception, sparking a plethora of theories and a burgeoning volume of research. To date, the answer to this question has been predicated on the assumption that fairness perceptions are subjective (i.e., "in the eye of the beholder"). This assumption is shared with motivated cognition approaches, which highlight the subjective nature of perceptions and the importance of viewing individuals arriving at those perceptions as active and motivated processors of information. Further, the motivated cognition literature has other key insights that have been less explicitly paralleled in the fairness literature, including how different goals (e.g., accuracy, directional) can influence how individuals process information and arrive at their perceptions. In this integrative conceptual review, we demonstrate how interpreting extant theory and research related to the formation of fairness perceptions through the lens of motivated cognition can deepen our understanding of fairness, including how individuals' goals and motivations can influence their subjective perceptions of fairness. We show how this approach can provide integration as well as generate new insights into fairness processes. We conclude by highlighting the implications that applying a motivated cognition perspective can have for the fairness literature and by providing a research agenda to guide the literature moving forward. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

个体如何形成公平感知?自公平文献诞生以来,这个问题一直是其核心,引发了众多理论和大量研究。迄今为止,这个问题的答案是基于公平感知是主观的(即“在观察者的眼中”)这一假设。这一假设与动机认知方法共享,该方法强调了感知的主观性以及将形成这些感知的个体视为积极和有动机的信息处理者的重要性。此外,动机认知文献还有其他一些关键见解,这些见解在公平文献中没有得到明确的呼应,包括不同的目标(例如,准确性、方向性)如何影响个体处理信息并形成他们的感知。在这个综合概念性综述中,我们展示了如何通过动机认知的视角来解释与公平感知形成相关的现有理论和研究,从而加深我们对公平的理解,包括个体的目标和动机如何影响他们对公平的主观感知。我们展示了这种方法如何提供整合,并为公平过程带来新的见解。最后,我们强调了应用动机认知视角对公平文献的影响,并提供了一个研究议程,以指导文献的进一步发展。

相似文献

1
Motivated cognition and fairness: Insights, integration, and creating a path forward.动机认知与公平:洞察、整合与前行之路
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Jun;102(6):867-889. doi: 10.1037/apl0000204. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
2
Motivated Cognition in Cooperation.合作中的动机认知。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Mar;19(2):385-403. doi: 10.1177/17456916231193990. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
3
Fairness, fast and slow: A review of dual process models of fairness.公平,快与慢:双过程模型视角下的公平综述
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Jun;89:49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
4
Subjective Time Perceptions and Aging Well: A Review of Concepts and Empirical Research - A Mini-Review.主观时间感知与健康老龄化:概念与实证研究综述——一篇小型综述
Gerontology. 2017;63(4):350-358. doi: 10.1159/000470906. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
5
The new synthesis in moral psychology.道德心理学的新综合。
Science. 2007 May 18;316(5827):998-1002. doi: 10.1126/science.1137651.
6
The neuroscience of motivated cognition.动机认知的神经科学。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Feb;19(2):62-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.006.
7
Explaining Fairness : Results from an Experiment in Guinea.解释公平:来自几内亚的实验结果。
Hum Nat. 2019 Dec;30(4):398-421. doi: 10.1007/s12110-019-09353-5.
8
Moral cognition in schizophrenia.精神分裂症中的道德认知。
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2014;19(6):495-508. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2014.928195. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
9
Of different minds: an accessible identity model of justice reasoning.不同的思维:一种易于理解的正义推理身份模型。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2003;7(4):286-97. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_02.
10
The energetics of motivated cognition: a force-field analysis.动机认知的能量学:力场分析。
Psychol Rev. 2012 Jan;119(1):1-20. doi: 10.1037/a0025488. Epub 2011 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Intersectional Penalties for Perceived Interpersonal Justice Violations among Black and Hispanic Male Leaders in the Workplace.职场中黑人与西班牙裔男性领导者之间因人际公正感知侵犯而产生的交叉惩罚。
J Bus Psychol. 2025;40(4):903-923. doi: 10.1007/s10869-024-09994-z. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
2
A Commentary on Miron et al. (2024): Why Managers May Not Actually Stop Caring About Gender Inequality.对米龙等人(2024年)的评论:为何管理者可能并非真的不再关心性别不平等问题。
Group Organ Manag. 2025 Jan 6;50(4):1234-1243. doi: 10.1177/10596011241312453. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Of Headlamps and Marbles: A Motivated Perceptual Approach to the Dynamic and Dialectic Nature of Fairness.
论前照灯与弹珠:一种关于公平动态与辩证本质的动机性感知方法。
Organ Psychol Rev. 2025 May;15(2):127-155. doi: 10.1177/20413866231199068. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
4
Ethnic-cultural procedural fairness effects on organizational identification and job satisfaction among minority and majority employees.种族文化程序公平性对少数族裔和多数族裔员工的组织认同和工作满意度的影响。
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 15;16:1445469. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1445469. eCollection 2025.
5
Procedural fairness in ethnic-cultural decision-making: fostering social cohesion by incorporating minority and majority perspectives.族裔文化决策中的程序公平:通过纳入少数群体和多数群体的观点促进社会凝聚力。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 4;14:1025153. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1025153. eCollection 2023.
6
How leaders restrict employees' deviance: An integrative framework of interactional justice and ethical leadership.领导者如何约束员工的越轨行为:互动公正与道德领导的整合框架
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 9;13:942472. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.942472. eCollection 2022.
7
Delivering bad news fairly: The influence of core self-evaluations and anxiety for the enactment of interpersonal justice.公正地传达坏消息:核心自我评价和焦虑对人际公正实施的影响。
Hum Relat. 2022 Jul;75(7):1238-1269. doi: 10.1177/00187267211011000. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
8
How Interpersonal Justice Shapes Legitimacy Perceptions: The Role of Interpersonal Justice Trajectories and Current Experience.人际公平如何塑造合法性认知:人际公平轨迹与当前体验的作用
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 23;11:582327. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.582327. eCollection 2020.