Yan Shen, Yan Feng, Liangyu Pei, Fei Xu
Department of Cancer V, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 15;6:1447075. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1447075. eCollection 2025.
Cancer is a multifactorial disease associated with intense pain and fatigue. Pain is the main discomfort experienced during cancer treatment, particularly as a major side effect of chemotherapy.
This study has aimed to investigate the effectiveness of non-pharmacological nursing strategies, including reflexology, aromatherapy, acupressure, massage therapy and acupuncture, in the management of cancer-associated pain. Moreover, it provides evidence-based recommendations for integrating these interventions into standard pain management protocols.
We gathered data from three major online databases; PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase. For the analysis, we exclusively targeted randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in managing cancer-related pain. No language restrictions were applied, and pain was considered the primary outcome measure.
Seventeen RCTs ( = 1,070) were included in this meta-analysis from 166 eligible studies. The pooled effect size demonstrated that all evaluated non-pharmacological nursing strategies, including aromatherapy, massage, reflexology, acupressure and acupuncture significantly reduced cancer-related pain compared to usual care ( < 0.001). Moreover, the reflexology and massage showed negligible heterogeneity among other interventions.
This meta-analysis found the significant effectiveness of non-pharmacological nursing strategies, particularly reflexology and massage in reducing cancer-related pain. The findings support their integration into clinical practice, providing evidence-based recommendations for enhancing standard pain management protocols.
癌症是一种与剧烈疼痛和疲劳相关的多因素疾病。疼痛是癌症治疗期间主要的不适症状,尤其是作为化疗的主要副作用。
本研究旨在调查非药物护理策略,包括反射疗法、芳香疗法、指压疗法、按摩疗法和针灸,在管理癌症相关疼痛方面的有效性。此外,它为将这些干预措施纳入标准疼痛管理方案提供基于证据的建议。
我们从三个主要在线数据库收集数据;PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和Embase。为了进行分析,我们专门针对评估非药物干预措施在管理癌症相关疼痛方面有效性的随机对照试验(RCT)。未应用语言限制,且疼痛被视为主要结局指标。
本荟萃分析纳入了166项符合条件的研究中的17项RCT(n = 1,070)。汇总效应量表明,与常规护理相比,所有评估的非药物护理策略,包括芳香疗法、按摩、反射疗法、指压疗法和针灸,均显著减轻了癌症相关疼痛(P < 0.001)。此外,反射疗法和按摩在其他干预措施中显示出可忽略不计的异质性。
本荟萃分析发现非药物护理策略具有显著有效性,尤其是反射疗法和按摩在减轻癌症相关疼痛方面。这些发现支持将它们整合到临床实践中,为加强标准疼痛管理方案提供基于证据的建议。