• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同冲洗液激活方法对牙髓再生生物膜的作用:一项研究。

The action of different irrigant activation methods on engineered endodontic biofilm: an study.

作者信息

Awaida Aya, El Hachem Roula, Issa Aline, Kallasy Mireille, Zogheib Carla, Hage Wajih

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

Craniofacial Research Laboratory, Division of Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

Biomater Investig Dent. 2025 Apr 11;12:43065. doi: 10.2340/biid.v12.43065. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2340/biid.v12.43065
PMID:40303577
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12038751/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Endodontic infections are biofilm-mediated, demanding effective biofilm eradication from the root canal. Root canal complexities, coupled with bacterial biofilm resistance, pose challenges to thorough disinfection. Irrigation, particularly with sodium hypochlorite, is crucial in endodontics. Activation techniques, like sonic or ultrasonic oscillations, enhance irrigant penetration and biofilm disruption, improving decontamination and treatment outcomes.The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of XP Finisher, EndoUltra, Eddy and Irriflex in the reduction of the multispecies endodontic biofilm formed by

METHODS

A total of 44 single-rooted mandibular premolars were selected and divided into groups for investigation: Group A: Irriflex, Group B: XP Finisher, Group C: Eddy system, and Group D: EndoUltra system. Multispecies biofilms, comprising and , were cultured and inoculated into the pre-treated dentinal canals, which were then incubated for 16 days. Following this, the canals were subjected to the respective irrigation protocols. Bacterial counts were assessed using sterile paper points and culture techniques post-irrigation. Additionally, four non-inoculated root canals were used as negative controls for comparison.

RESULTS

EndoUltra achieved the highest reduction in Total Bacterial Count (TBC) with a median decrease of 75% (interquartile range [IQR]: 70-80%), significantly better than XP Finisher ( = 0.001) and Irriflex ( = 0.001). Eddy led to a reduction in (PA) with a median decrease of 85% (IQR: 80-90%), significantly outperforming Irriflex ( = 0.001) and XP Finisher ( = 0.001). For (EF), EndoUltra had a median reduction of 70% (IQR: 65-75%), significantly better than Eddy ( = 0.01) and Irriflex ( = 0.001), while XP Finisher resulted in a reduction of 60% (IQR: 55-65%). EndoUltra showed the highest reduction in (ProM) with 80% (IQR: 75-85%), significantly better than Irriflex ( = 0.001) and XP Finisher ( = 0.001), with Eddy also better than Irriflex ( = 0.009). EndoUltra reduced (CA) by 65% (IQR: 60-70%), significantly outperforming XP Finisher ( = 0.001) and Eddy ( = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Within its limitations, this study identified EndoUltra as highly effective in reducing bacterial counts, indicating its potential utility in disinfecting root canals. These findings underscore the significance of such methods in enhancing treatment outcomes and addressing root canal infections.

摘要

引言

牙髓感染是由生物膜介导的,需要从根管中有效清除生物膜。根管的复杂性以及细菌生物膜的抗性对彻底消毒构成了挑战。冲洗,尤其是使用次氯酸钠冲洗,在牙髓病学中至关重要。诸如声波或超声波振荡等激活技术可增强冲洗液的渗透和生物膜破坏,改善去污效果和治疗结果。本研究的目的是评估XP Finisher、EndoUltra、Eddy和Irriflex在减少由……形成的多菌种牙髓生物膜方面的有效性。

方法

总共选择了44颗单根下颌前磨牙并分为几组进行研究:A组:Irriflex;B组:XP Finisher;C组:Eddy系统;D组:EndoUltra系统。培养包含……和……的多菌种生物膜,并将其接种到预处理的牙本质根管中,然后孵育16天。在此之后,对根管进行各自的冲洗方案。冲洗后使用无菌纸尖和培养技术评估细菌计数。此外,使用四个未接种的根管作为阴性对照进行比较。

结果

EndoUltra在总细菌计数(TBC)方面实现了最高的减少,中位数下降75%(四分位间距[IQR]:70 - 80%),显著优于XP Finisher( = 0.001)和Irriflex( = 0.001)。Eddy使……(PA)减少,中位数下降85%(IQR:80 - 90%),显著优于Irriflex( = 0.001)和XP Finisher( = 0.001)。对于……(EF),EndoUltra的中位数减少为70%(IQR:65 - 75%),显著优于Eddy( = 0.01)和Irriflex( = 0.001),而XP Finisher导致减少60%(IQR:55 - 65%)。EndoUltra在……(ProM)方面的减少最高,为80%(IQR:75 - 85%),显著优于Irriflex( = 憨掸封赶莩非凤石脯将0.001)和XP Finisher( = 0.001),Eddy也优于Irriflex( = 0.009)。EndoUltra使……(CA)减少65%(IQR:60 - 70%),显著优于XP Finisher( = 0.001)和Eddy( = 0.001)。

结论

在其局限性范围内,本研究确定EndoUltra在减少细菌计数方面非常有效,表明其在根管消毒中的潜在用途。这些发现强调了此类方法在提高治疗效果和解决根管感染方面的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a980/12038751/f8b469d99c74/BIiD-12-43065-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a980/12038751/aea70d28afce/BIiD-12-43065-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a980/12038751/c26b80a0c7fa/BIiD-12-43065-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a980/12038751/f8b469d99c74/BIiD-12-43065-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a980/12038751/aea70d28afce/BIiD-12-43065-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a980/12038751/c26b80a0c7fa/BIiD-12-43065-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a980/12038751/f8b469d99c74/BIiD-12-43065-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The action of different irrigant activation methods on engineered endodontic biofilm: an study.不同冲洗液激活方法对牙髓再生生物膜的作用:一项研究。
Biomater Investig Dent. 2025 Apr 11;12:43065. doi: 10.2340/biid.v12.43065. eCollection 2025.
2
In vitro evaluation of three engineered multispecies endodontic biofilms on a dentinal disk substrate.在牙本质盘基质上对三种工程化多物种牙髓生物膜进行体外评估。
Biomater Investig Dent. 2023 Dec 21;10(1):2281091. doi: 10.1080/26415275.2023.2281091. eCollection 2023.
3
Impact of agitation/activation strategies on the antibiofilm potential of sodium hypochlorite/etidronate mixture in vitro.体外研究不同激惹/激活策略对次氯酸钠/依替膦酸混合物抗生物膜潜力的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 May 23;22(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02222-1.
4
A laboratory study of root canal and isthmus disinfection in extracted teeth using various activation methods with a mixture of sodium hypochlorite and etidronic acid.一项使用不同激活方法,用次氯酸钠和依替膦酸混合液对离体牙的根管和峡部进行消毒的实验室研究。
Int Endod J. 2021 Feb;54(2):268-278. doi: 10.1111/iej.13417. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
5
Influence of Needle Design and Irrigant Flow Rate on the Removal of Biofilms In Vitro.针头设计和冲洗液流速对体外生物膜清除的影响
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Apr 2;10(4):59. doi: 10.3390/dj10040059.
6
In vitro evaluation of efficacy of two endodontic sonic-powered irrigant agitation systems in killing single-species intracanal biofilms.体外评估两种根管超声动力冲洗系统杀灭单种根管内生物膜的疗效。
J Dent. 2021 Dec;115:103859. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103859. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
7
Impact of Different Irrigant Agitation Methods on Bacterial Elimination from Infected Root Canals.不同冲洗液搅拌方法对感染根管内细菌清除的影响
Dent J (Basel). 2019 Jun 27;7(3):64. doi: 10.3390/dj7030064.
8
Antibacterial efficacy of an endodontic sonic-powered irrigation system: An in vitro study.根管超声冲洗系统的抗菌效果:一项体外研究。
J Dent. 2018 Aug;75:105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
9
Antibacterial Effect of Photodynamic Therapy on Root Canal Disinfection Combined with Different Irrigation Protocols.光动力疗法联合不同冲洗方案对根管消毒的抗菌作用
Iran Endod J. 2020 Spring;15(2):90-95. doi: 10.22037/iej.v15i2.27801.
10
Effectiveness of supplementary antimicrobial procedures in disinfecting lateral canals as evaluated by a novel ex vivo analytical approach.新型离体分析方法评价补充抗菌程序对侧支根管消毒的效果。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 19;14(1):21840. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72041-7.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effectiveness of Sonic-Activated Irrigation in Reducing Intratubular .声激活冲洗在减少根管内……方面的有效性
Iran Endod J. 2019 Winter;14(1):63-67. doi: 10.22037/iej.v14i1.22436.
2
Efficacy of sonic and ultrasonic activation during endodontic treatment: a Meta-analysis of studies.根管治疗中声波和超声波激活的疗效:研究的Meta分析
Acta Odontol Scand. 2022 Nov;80(8):588-595. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2022.2061591. Epub 2022 Apr 17.
3
Irrigating Solutions and Activation Methods Used in Clinical Endodontics: A Systematic Review.
临床牙髓病学中使用的冲洗液及激活方法:一项系统评价
Front Oral Health. 2022 Jan 31;3:838043. doi: 10.3389/froh.2022.838043. eCollection 2022.
4
Endodontic Microbiology: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 50 Classics.牙髓微生物学:50 篇经典文献的计量分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Jun 1;2021:6657167. doi: 10.1155/2021/6657167. eCollection 2021.
5
Evaluation of various irrigation activation systems to eliminate bacteria from the root canal system: A randomized controlled single blinded trial.评价各种冲洗激活系统从根管系统中清除细菌的效果:一项随机对照单盲试验。
J Dent. 2020 Aug;99:103412. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103412. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
6
Effect of passive ultrasonic activation on microorganisms in primary root canal infection: a randomized clinical trial.被动超声激活对原发性根管感染中微生物的影响:一项随机临床试验。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2019 Nov 28;28:e20190100. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0100. eCollection 2020.
7
Impact of Different Irrigant Agitation Methods on Bacterial Elimination from Infected Root Canals.不同冲洗液搅拌方法对感染根管内细菌清除的影响
Dent J (Basel). 2019 Jun 27;7(3):64. doi: 10.3390/dj7030064.
8
Penetration depth of irrigants into root dentine after sonic, ultrasonic and photoacoustic activation.超声、超声和光声激活后冲洗液在根管牙本质中的渗透深度。
Int Endod J. 2019 Aug;52(8):1210-1217. doi: 10.1111/iej.13108. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
9
Biofilm model systems for root canal disinfection: a literature review.用于根管消毒的生物膜模型系统:文献综述。
Int Endod J. 2019 May;52(5):604-628. doi: 10.1111/iej.13050. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
10
Endodontic irrigants: Different methods to improve efficacy and related problems.牙髓冲洗剂:提高疗效的不同方法及相关问题
Eur J Dent. 2018 Jul-Sep;12(3):459-466. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_56_18.