Oliveto Alison H, McGaugh Janette, Chopra Mohit P, Thostenson Jeff, Mancino Michael J
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Psychiatry, 4301 W. Markham St., Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
Ouachita Behavioral Health and Wellness, 125 Wellness Way, Hot Springs, AR, 71913, USA.
J Psychiatr Res. 2025 Jun;186:387-395. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.04.051. Epub 2025 Apr 26.
PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Previously, disulfiram less than 250 mg/day increased cocaine use relative to placebo whereas disulfiram at 250 mg/day did not differ from placebo among methadone-stabilized individuals with dual cocaine and opioid dependence, suggesting disulfiram at higher doses needed to be tested. This study determined tolerability and efficacy of disulfiram at higher doses (250-500 mg/day).
METHODS/PROCEDURES: In a 14-wk, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, 53 participants with cocaine and opioid dependence were enrolled, inducted onto methadone (weeks 1-2), randomized to receive placebo or disulfiram (250, 375 or 500 mg/day) during weeks 3-14, and provided weekly 1-h individual cognitive behavior therapy throughout. Thrice-weekly urine samples were tested for the presence of cocaine metabolite. Weekly vital signs and monthly mood assessments were obtained.
RESULTS/FINDINGS: Disulfiram groups generally did not differ on subject characteristics or retention. Cocaine-positive urine samples showed a significant increase over time in the placebo group (p = 0.04), with the placebo slope being significantly greater than horizontal. Cocaine-positive urine samples decreased over time in the disulfiram 250 mg (p = 0.014) and 375 mg (p = 0.015), but not 500 mg (p = 0.11), groups relative to placebo, although slopes of these medication groups did not differ significantly from horizontal (p > 0.15). No clinically significant differences across groups with respect to vital signs or mood ratings occurred.
IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Although preliminary due to the small sample size, disulfiram at 250-375 mg/day may be ineffective in reducing cocaine use and have limited efficacy to prevent increases in cocaine use among methadone-stabilized patients with dual cocaine and opioid dependence.
目的/背景:此前,对于同时患有可卡因和阿片类药物依赖且使用美沙酮维持治疗的个体,每天服用低于250毫克的双硫仑会导致可卡因使用量相对于安慰剂增加,而每天服用250毫克双硫仑的情况与安慰剂无差异,这表明需要对更高剂量的双硫仑进行测试。本研究确定了更高剂量(250 - 500毫克/天)双硫仑的耐受性和疗效。
方法/步骤:在一项为期14周的双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验中,招募了53名同时患有可卡因和阿片类药物依赖的参与者,先在第1 - 2周接受美沙酮诱导治疗,然后在第3 - 14周随机分为接受安慰剂或双硫仑(250、375或500毫克/天)治疗组,并在整个过程中每周提供1小时的个体认知行为疗法。每周三次采集尿液样本检测可卡因代谢物的存在情况。每周记录生命体征,每月进行情绪评估。
结果/发现:双硫仑治疗组在受试者特征或留存率方面通常无差异。安慰剂组中可卡因阳性尿液样本随时间显著增加(p = 0.04),安慰剂组的斜率显著大于水平斜率。相对于安慰剂,双硫仑250毫克组(p = 0.014)和375毫克组(p = 0.015)的可卡因阳性尿液样本随时间减少,但500毫克组(p = 0.11)未减少,尽管这些药物组的斜率与水平斜率无显著差异(p > 0.15)。各组在生命体征或情绪评分方面未出现具有临床意义的差异。
启示/结论:尽管由于样本量小,本研究结果具有初步性,但每天服用250 - 375毫克双硫仑可能对减少可卡因使用无效,对于同时患有可卡因和阿片类药物依赖且使用美沙酮维持治疗的患者,预防可卡因使用增加的疗效有限。