• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Unification of sentence processing via ear and eye: an fMRI study.通过耳和眼实现句子处理的统一:一项 fMRI 研究。
Cortex. 2011 Apr;47(4):416-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.11.005. Epub 2010 Jan 11.
2
Localization of electrophysiological responses to semantic and syntactic anomalies in language comprehension with MEG.使用 MEG 定位语言理解中语义和句法异常的电生理反应。
Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 15;105:507-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.016. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
3
Distinct patterns of neural modulation during the processing of conceptual and syntactic anomalies.在处理概念和句法异常过程中不同的神经调节模式。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Feb 15;15(2):272-93. doi: 10.1162/089892903321208204.
4
Whole-Brain Dimensions of Intrinsic Connectivity Capture Modality-Specific and Heteromodal Language Representations.内在连接性的全脑维度捕捉特定模态和跨模态语言表征。
J Neurosci. 2025 May 28;45(22):e1876242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1876-24.2025.
5
Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension.眼动追踪与功能磁共振成像相结合揭示句子理解过程中语言预测的神经基础。
Cortex. 2015 Jul;68:33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
6
The Representation of Semantic Information Across Human Cerebral Cortex During Listening Versus Reading Is Invariant to Stimulus Modality.在听和读两种模式下,人类大脑皮层对语义信息的表示在刺激方式上是不变的。
J Neurosci. 2019 Sep 25;39(39):7722-7736. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0675-19.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
7
Imagery in sentence comprehension: an fMRI study.句子理解中的意象:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Neuroimage. 2004 Jan;21(1):112-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.042.
8
Dynamic brain connectivity attuned to the complexity of relative clause sentences revealed by a single-trial analysis.基于单试次分析揭示的对关系从句句子复杂度敏感的动态脑连接。
Neuroimage. 2020 Aug 15;217:116920. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116920. Epub 2020 May 8.
9
The effect of presentation paradigm on syntactic processing: An event-related fMRI study.呈现范式对句法加工的影响:一项事件相关 fMRI 研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Jan;31(1):65-79. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20845.
10
Retrieval and unification of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an FMRI study using word-category ambiguity.句子理解中句法结构的提取与整合:一项使用词类歧义的功能磁共振成像研究。
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Jul;19(7):1493-503. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn187. Epub 2008 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Cortical cognitive processing during reading captured using functional-near infrared spectroscopy.使用功能近红外光谱技术捕获阅读过程中的皮质认知加工。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 22;14(1):19483. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69630-x.
2
Supramodal Sentence Processing in the Human Brain: fMRI Evidence for the Influence of Syntactic Complexity in More Than 200 Participants.人类大脑中的跨模态句子处理:超过200名参与者的功能磁共振成像证据表明句法复杂性的影响
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2022 Sep 29;3(4):575-598. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00076. eCollection 2022.
3
Sentence comprehension test for Russian: A tool to assess syntactic competence.俄语句子理解测试:一种评估句法能力的工具。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 10;14:1035961. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1035961. eCollection 2023.
4
Segmented relations between online reading behaviors, text properties, and reader-text interactions: An eye-movement experiment.在线阅读行为、文本属性与读者-文本交互之间的分段关系:一项眼动实验。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 11;13:1006662. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1006662. eCollection 2022.
5
Syntactic and Semantic Processing in Japanese Sentence Reading: A Research Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS).日语句子阅读中的句法和语义处理:一项使用功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)的研究。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2023 Feb;52(1):57-73. doi: 10.1007/s10936-021-09818-8. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
6
Incremental Language Comprehension Difficulty Predicts Activity in the Language Network but Not the Multiple Demand Network.语言理解难度的逐渐增加可预测语言网络的活动,但不能预测多重需求网络的活动。
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Jul 29;31(9):4006-4023. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab065.
7
Tracking second language immersion across time: Evidence from a bi-directional longitudinal cross-linguistic fMRI study.追踪第二语言沉浸式学习的时间变化:来自双向纵向跨语言 fMRI 研究的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Apr 16;154:107796. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107796. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
8
Situating the left-lateralized language network in the broader organization of multiple specialized large-scale distributed networks.将左侧语言网络置于多个专门化的大规模分布式网络的更广泛组织中。
J Neurophysiol. 2020 Nov 1;124(5):1415-1448. doi: 10.1152/jn.00753.2019. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
9
No evidence for differences among language regions in their temporal receptive windows.没有证据表明语言区域之间在时间接受窗口方面存在差异。
Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 1;219:116925. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116925. Epub 2020 May 11.
10
Sensory Modality-Independent Activation of the Brain Network for Language.感觉模态独立激活语言的大脑网络。
J Neurosci. 2020 Apr 1;40(14):2914-2924. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2271-19.2020. Epub 2020 Feb 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Bridging the Gap: Evidence from ERPs on the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies.弥合差距:来自 ERP 研究的关于无界依存关系处理的证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1993 Spring;5(2):196-214. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.2.196.
2
Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading.谁在何时做了什么?使用词和子句水平的事件相关电位来监测阅读中的工作记忆使用情况。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1995 Summer;7(3):376-95. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1995.7.3.376.
3
An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval.基于激活的句子处理模型是一种熟练的记忆检索。
Cogn Sci. 2005 May 6;29(3):375-419. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_25.
4
Integrated Intensity and Point-Feature Nonrigid Registration.综合强度与点特征非刚性配准
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2001 Sep 2;3216(2004):763-770. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.3216-763.
5
Dyslexia: a new synergy between education and cognitive neuroscience.诵读困难症:教育与认知神经科学之间的一种新协同作用。
Science. 2009 Jul 17;325(5938):280-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1171999.
6
Reading differences and brain: cortical integration of speech and print in sentence processing varies with reader skill.阅读差异与大脑:句子处理中语音和文字的皮层整合随阅读技能而变化。
Dev Neuropsychol. 2008;33(6):745-75. doi: 10.1080/87565640802418688.
7
Predicting human brain activity associated with the meanings of nouns.预测与名词含义相关的人类大脑活动。
Science. 2008 May 30;320(5880):1191-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1152876.
8
Speaking up for vocabulary: reading skill differences in young adults.为词汇发声:年轻人的阅读技能差异
J Learn Disabil. 2007 May-Jun;40(3):226-43. doi: 10.1177/00222194070400030401.
9
Supramodal language comprehension: role of the left temporal lobe for listening and reading.跨模态语言理解:左颞叶在听力和阅读中的作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jun 11;45(10):2407-15. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.008. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
10
Impact of modality and linguistic complexity during reading and listening tasks.阅读和听力任务中模态与语言复杂性的影响。
Neuroimage. 2007 Jan 15;34(2):784-800. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.067. Epub 2006 Nov 15.

通过耳和眼实现句子处理的统一:一项 fMRI 研究。

Unification of sentence processing via ear and eye: an fMRI study.

机构信息

Haskins Laboratories, 300 George Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA.

出版信息

Cortex. 2011 Apr;47(4):416-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.11.005. Epub 2010 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.11.005
PMID:20117764
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2889140/
Abstract

We present new evidence based on fMRI for the existence and neural architecture of an abstract supramodal language system that can integrate linguistic inputs arising from different modalities such that speech and print each activate a common code. Working with sentence material, our aim was to find out where the putative supramodal system is located and how it responds to comprehension challenges. To probe these questions we examined BOLD activity in experienced readers while they performed a semantic categorization task with matched written or spoken sentences that were either well-formed or contained anomalies of syntactic form or pragmatic content. On whole-brain scans, both anomalies increased net activity over non-anomalous baseline sentences, chiefly at left frontal and temporal regions of heteromodal cortex. The anomaly-sensitive sites correspond approximately to those that previous studies (Michael et al., 2001; Constable et al., 2004) have found to be sensitive to other differences in sentence complexity (object relative minus subject relative). Regions of interest (ROIs) were defined by peak response to anomaly averaging over modality conditions. Each anomaly-sensitive ROI showed the same pattern of response across sentence types in each modality. Voxel-by-voxel exploration over the whole brain based on a cosine similarity measure of common function confirmed the specificity of supramodal zones.

摘要

我们提出了新的基于 fMRI 的证据,证明存在一种抽象的超模态语言系统,它可以整合来自不同模态的语言输入,使得言语和书写都能激活共同的代码。在使用句子材料的过程中,我们的目的是找出假设的超模态系统的位置以及它如何对理解挑战做出反应。为了探究这些问题,我们在有经验的读者进行语义分类任务时,检查了他们的大脑活动,这些任务使用的是匹配的书面或口头句子,这些句子要么形式正确,要么包含句法形式或语用内容的异常。在全脑扫描中,两种异常情况都增加了异常句子相对于正常句子的净激活,主要是在左额颞部的异模态皮质。异常敏感的部位与以前的研究(Michael 等人,2001 年;Constable 等人,2004 年)发现的对句子复杂性(宾语先行与主语先行)的其他差异敏感的部位大致相同。感兴趣区域(ROIs)是通过对模态条件下异常的平均峰值反应来定义的。每个异常敏感的 ROI 在每种模态的句子类型中都表现出相同的反应模式。基于余弦相似性函数的全脑体素级探索证实了超模态区域的特异性。