• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《全球繁荣研究》中22个国家慈善捐赠与助人行为的人口统计学差异。

Demographic variation in charitable giving and helping across 22 countries in the Global Flourishing Study.

作者信息

Nakamura Julia S, Węziak-Białowolska Dorota, Woodberry Robert D, Kubzansky Laura D, Shiba Koichiro, Padgett R Noah, Johnson Byron R, VanderWeele Tyler J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.

Department of Quantitative Methods and Information Technology, Kozminski University, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):14802. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96009-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-96009-3
PMID:40307329
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12043921/
Abstract

Prosocial behaviors play a vital role in promoting individual and societal well-being. Charitable giving and helping strangers are two important expressions of prosociality; yet we know little about how these behaviors differ across sociodemographic indicators cross-nationally. Using data from the Global Flourishing Study, a diverse and international sample of 202,898 individuals across 22 countries, we examined distributions of charitable giving and helping (binary variables, yes/no) across nine demographic factors (age, gender, marital status, employment status, religious service attendance, education, immigration status, race and ethnicity, and religious affiliation) and culturally diverse countries. Unadjusted proportions of charitable giving and helping in the past month varied substantially between countries for charitable giving (from 0.10 [Japan] to 0.79 [Indonesia]) and helping (from 0.11 [Japan] to 0.83 [Nigeria]). Random effects meta-analyses confirmed that rates of charitable giving and helping differed among some demographic groups (e.g., more charitable giving with older age, less helping with older age, increased charitable giving and helping with more education) and that rates of charitable giving and helping across all demographic factors differed between countries. Better understanding how various sociodemographic factors may be associated with prosocial behaviors, and how these associations differ internationally, may help to inform interventions designed to enhance prosociality around the world.

摘要

亲社会行为在促进个人和社会福祉方面发挥着至关重要的作用。慈善捐赠和帮助陌生人是亲社会性的两种重要表现形式;然而,我们对这些行为在跨国社会人口统计学指标上的差异知之甚少。利用全球繁荣研究的数据,该研究涵盖了来自22个国家的202,898名多样化的国际样本个体,我们考察了慈善捐赠和帮助行为(二元变量,是/否)在九个人口统计学因素(年龄、性别、婚姻状况、就业状况、宗教活动参与情况、教育程度、移民身份、种族和民族以及宗教信仰)以及文化多元的国家中的分布情况。过去一个月内慈善捐赠和帮助行为的未调整比例在不同国家之间差异很大,慈善捐赠方面(从0.10[日本]到0.79[印度尼西亚]),帮助行为方面(从0.11[日本]到0.83[尼日利亚])。随机效应荟萃分析证实,慈善捐赠和帮助行为的发生率在一些人口统计学群体中存在差异(例如,年龄越大慈善捐赠越多,年龄越大帮助行为越少,教育程度越高慈善捐赠和帮助行为越多),并且所有人口统计学因素的慈善捐赠和帮助行为发生率在不同国家之间也存在差异。更好地理解各种社会人口统计学因素如何与亲社会行为相关联,以及这些关联在国际上如何不同,可能有助于为旨在增强全球亲社会性的干预措施提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1460/12043921/4b73b6b6cbe0/41598_2025_96009_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1460/12043921/4b73b6b6cbe0/41598_2025_96009_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1460/12043921/4b73b6b6cbe0/41598_2025_96009_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Demographic variation in charitable giving and helping across 22 countries in the Global Flourishing Study.《全球繁荣研究》中22个国家慈善捐赠与助人行为的人口统计学差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):14802. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96009-3.
2
Childhood predictors of charitable giving and helping across 22 countries in the Global Flourishing Study.全球繁荣研究中22个国家儿童慈善捐赠与助人行为的童年预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):14493. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77950-1.
3
Demographic variation in self-rated physical health across 22 countries: findings from the Global Flourishing Study.22个国家自我评定身体健康状况的人口统计学差异:全球繁荣研究的结果
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 30;3(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00141-1.
4
Sociodemographic variations of belief in life after death across 22 Countries.22个国家中关于死后生命信仰的社会人口统计学差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):14310. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83541-x.
5
Charity preferences and perceived impact moderate charitable giving and associated neural response.慈善偏好和感知影响会调节慈善捐赠行为及其相关的神经反应。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Sep 17;160:107957. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107957. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
6
Sociodemographic variation in dispositional forgivingness: a cross-national analysis with 22 countries.性格宽容度的社会人口统计学差异:一项对22个国家的跨国分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):12144. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82502-8.
7
Childhood predictors of volunteering across 22 countries in the Global Flourishing Study.全球幸福研究中22个国家志愿服务的童年预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):14797. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81639-w.
8
Demographic variation in pain across 22 countries.22个国家疼痛情况的人口统计学差异。
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 May 5;5(1):154. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00858-y.
9
Framing charitable donations as exceptional expenses increases giving.将慈善捐赠视为特殊支出会增加捐赠。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2015 Jun;21(2):130-9. doi: 10.1037/xap0000047. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
10
Prosocial spending and well-being: cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal.亲社会支出与幸福感:心理普遍性的跨文化证据。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Apr;104(4):635-52. doi: 10.1037/a0031578. Epub 2013 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The Global Flourishing Study: Study Profile and Initial Results on Flourishing.全球繁荣研究:繁荣的研究概况与初步结果
Nat Ment Health. 2025;3(6):636-653. doi: 10.1038/s44220-025-00423-5. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
2
Childhood predictors of charitable giving and helping across 22 countries in the Global Flourishing Study.全球繁荣研究中22个国家儿童慈善捐赠与助人行为的童年预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):14493. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77950-1.

本文引用的文献

1
The development of the Global Flourishing Study questionnaire: charting the evolution of a new 109-item inventory of human flourishing.全球繁荣研究问卷的开发:勾勒一份新的109项人类繁荣量表的演变历程。
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 30;3(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00139-9.
2
Analytic methodology for demographic variation analyses for wave 1 of the global flourishing study.全球繁荣研究第一波人口统计学变异分析的分析方法。
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 30;3(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00140-2.
3
Survey sampling design in wave 1 of the Global Flourishing Study.
全球繁荣研究第一阶段的调查抽样设计。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2025 Mar 27. doi: 10.1007/s10654-024-01167-9.
4
Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature.性别与助人行为:社会心理学文献的元分析综述
Psychol Bull. 1986 Nov;100(3):283-308. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.283.
5
Prosociality should be a public health priority.亲社会性应该成为公共卫生的优先事项。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Dec;7(12):2051-2053. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01717-3.
6
Educational attainment is associated with unconditional helping behaviour.教育程度与无条件帮助行为相关。
Evol Hum Sci. 2019 Dec 11;1:e15. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2019.16. eCollection 2019.
7
Informal Helping and Subsequent Health and Well-Being in Older U.S. Adults.美国老年人非正式帮助与后续健康和幸福感。
Int J Behav Med. 2024 Aug;31(4):503-515. doi: 10.1007/s12529-023-10187-w. Epub 2023 May 26.
8
The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic.《柳叶刀》新冠疫情对未来的启示委员会
Lancet. 2022 Oct 8;400(10359):1224-1280. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01585-9. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
9
Robust Metrics and Sensitivity Analyses for Meta-analyses of Heterogeneous Effects.稳健性度量和敏感性分析在异质效应荟萃分析中的应用
Epidemiology. 2020 May;31(3):356-358. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001180.
10
Universal norm psychology leads to societal diversity in prosocial behaviour and development.普遍规范心理学导致亲社会行为和发展的社会多样性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jan;4(1):36-44. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0734-z. Epub 2019 Sep 23.