• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性格宽容度的社会人口统计学差异:一项对22个国家的跨国分析。

Sociodemographic variation in dispositional forgivingness: a cross-national analysis with 22 countries.

作者信息

Cowden Richard G, Worthington Everett L, Chung Caleb A, De Kock Johannes H, Weziak-Bialowolska Dorota, Yancey George, Shiba Koichiro, Padgett R Noah, Bradshaw Matt, Johnson Byron R, VanderWeele Tyler J

机构信息

Human Flourishing Program, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):12144. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82502-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-82502-8
PMID:40307281
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12043934/
Abstract

We used nationally representative data from the first wave of the Global Flourishing Study (N = 202,898) to (1) explore the distribution of forgivingness in 22 geographically and culturally diverse countries and (2) identify potential differences in dispositional forgivingness across nine sociodemographic characteristics (age, gender, marital status, employment status, years of education, immigration status, frequency of religious service attendance, religious affiliation, racial/ethnic identity). Our descriptive analysis supported substantial cross-national variation in the proportion of people who endorsed 'often/always' forgiving others, ranging from .41 (Türkiye) to .92 (Nigeria). We estimated country-level descriptive statistics for forgivingness in each sociodemographic category, and then performed a series of random effects meta-analyses to aggregate results across countries. Meta-analytic results provided evidence of subgroup differences in forgivingness for religious service attendance and (to a lesser extent) age, with the highest forgivingness observed among people who attended religious services more than once a week and those 80 years or older. However, sociodemographic differences in forgivingness varied considerably across countries, including for those sociodemographic variables that did not show clear evidence of subgroup differences when country-specific estimates were pooled. Our findings lay the foundation for population-level assessment of forgiveness over time and public health strategies to promote forgiveness.

摘要

我们使用了来自全球繁荣研究第一波的具有全国代表性的数据(N = 202,898),以(1)探究22个地理和文化多样的国家中宽容度的分布情况,以及(2)确定在九个社会人口学特征(年龄、性别、婚姻状况、就业状况、受教育年限、移民身份、宗教仪式出席频率、宗教归属、种族/民族身份)方面,性格宽容度的潜在差异。我们的描述性分析表明,在认可“经常/总是”原谅他人的人群比例方面,存在显著的跨国差异,范围从0.41(土耳其)到0.92(尼日利亚)。我们估计了每个社会人口学类别中宽容度的国家层面描述性统计数据,然后进行了一系列随机效应荟萃分析,以汇总各国的结果。荟萃分析结果提供了证据,表明在宗教仪式出席情况以及(在较小程度上)年龄方面,宽容度存在亚组差异,在每周参加一次以上宗教仪式的人群以及80岁及以上人群中观察到最高的宽容度。然而,宽容度的社会人口学差异在各国之间差异很大,包括那些在汇总特定国家估计值时未显示出明显亚组差异证据的社会人口学变量。我们的研究结果为随时间推移在人群层面评估宽恕以及促进宽恕的公共卫生策略奠定了基础。

相似文献

1
Sociodemographic variation in dispositional forgivingness: a cross-national analysis with 22 countries.性格宽容度的社会人口统计学差异:一项对22个国家的跨国分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):12144. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82502-8.
2
A cross-national analysis of sociodemographic variation in suffering across 22 countries.一项对22个国家痛苦状况的社会人口统计学差异的跨国分析。
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Apr 30;5(1):144. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00859-x.
3
Sociodemographic variations of belief in life after death across 22 Countries.22个国家中关于死后生命信仰的社会人口统计学差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):14310. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83541-x.
4
Associations of dispositional forgivingness with facets of well-being among Colombian adults: A longitudinal outcome-wide analysis.哥伦比亚成年人中性格宽容与幸福各方面的关联:一项纵向全结果分析。
Int J Psychol. 2023 Apr;58(2):153-163. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12883. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
5
Demographic variation in self-rated physical health across 22 countries: findings from the Global Flourishing Study.22个国家自我评定身体健康状况的人口统计学差异:全球繁荣研究的结果
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 30;3(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00141-1.
6
The distribution of optimism across sociodemographic groups in 22 countries.22个国家社会人口群体中乐观情绪的分布情况。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):14553. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77257-1.
7
Gender and age differences in forgivingness in Italian and Polish samples.意大利和波兰样本中宽恕方面的性别与年龄差异。
Heliyon. 2022 Jun 22;8(6):e09771. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09771. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
Negative Interpersonal Interactions and Dating Abuse Perpetration: The Mediating Role of Dispositional Forgivingness.消极的人际互动和约会暴力行为:性格宽恕的中介作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Aug;33(15):2311-2334. doi: 10.1177/0886260517714438. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
9
Demographic variation in charitable giving and helping across 22 countries in the Global Flourishing Study.《全球繁荣研究》中22个国家慈善捐赠与助人行为的人口统计学差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):14802. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96009-3.
10
Unforgiveness, depression, and health in later life: the protective factor of forgivingness.晚年的怨恨、抑郁与健康:宽容的保护作用
Aging Ment Health. 2016 Oct;20(10):1021-34. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1060942. Epub 2015 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Childhood Predictors of Dispositional Forgivingness in Adulthood: A Cross-National Analysis with 22 Countries.童年期对成年期特质性宽容的预测因素:一项对22个国家的跨国分析
Appl Res Qual Life. 2025;20(3):1057-1084. doi: 10.1007/s11482-025-10451-z. Epub 2025 May 7.
2
The Global Flourishing Study: Study Profile and Initial Results on Flourishing.全球繁荣研究:繁荣的研究概况与初步结果
Nat Ment Health. 2025;3(6):636-653. doi: 10.1038/s44220-025-00423-5. Epub 2025 Apr 30.

本文引用的文献

1
The development of the Global Flourishing Study questionnaire: charting the evolution of a new 109-item inventory of human flourishing.全球繁荣研究问卷的开发:勾勒一份新的109项人类繁荣量表的演变历程。
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 30;3(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00139-9.
2
Analytic methodology for demographic variation analyses for wave 1 of the global flourishing study.全球繁荣研究第一波人口统计学变异分析的分析方法。
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 30;3(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00140-2.
3
Survey sampling design in wave 1 of the Global Flourishing Study.全球繁荣研究第一阶段的调查抽样设计。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2025 Mar 27. doi: 10.1007/s10654-024-01167-9.
4
International REACH forgiveness intervention: a multisite randomised controlled trial.国际REACH宽恕干预:一项多中心随机对照试验。
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Mar 13;2(1):e000072. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000072. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Do Forgiveness Campaign Activities Improve Forgiveness, Mental Health, and Flourishing?宽恕运动活动能否提高宽恕、心理健康和繁荣?
Int J Public Health. 2024 Mar 8;69:1605341. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1605341. eCollection 2024.
6
Seasonality and the female happiness paradox.季节性与女性幸福悖论。
Qual Quant. 2023 Feb 21:1-33. doi: 10.1007/s11135-023-01628-5.
7
Associations of dispositional forgivingness with facets of well-being among Colombian adults: A longitudinal outcome-wide analysis.哥伦比亚成年人中性格宽容与幸福各方面的关联:一项纵向全结果分析。
Int J Psychol. 2023 Apr;58(2):153-163. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12883. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
8
A meta-analysis of forgiveness education interventions' effects on forgiveness and anger in children and adolescents.一项元分析宽恕教育干预对儿童和青少年宽恕和愤怒的影响。
Child Dev. 2022 Sep;93(5):1249-1269. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13771. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
9
Optimising child and adolescent health and development through an integrated ecological life course approach.通过综合生态生命历程方法优化儿童和青少年健康与发展。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 17;372:m4784. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4784.
10
Robust Metrics and Sensitivity Analyses for Meta-analyses of Heterogeneous Effects.稳健性度量和敏感性分析在异质效应荟萃分析中的应用
Epidemiology. 2020 May;31(3):356-358. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001180.